IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v30y2016icp10-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor response to online value line rank changes: Foreign versus local stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Prombutr, Wikrom
  • Lockwood, Jimmy
  • Zhang, Ying
  • Le, Steven V.

Abstract

We find that the Value Line effect is confined to U.S. stocks. U.S. listed stocks significantly outperform their benchmarks long after Value Line Timeliness rank change announcements. In contrast, we find no evidence of a Value Line effect for recommendations made for foreign stocks that list on U.S. exchanges, nor for those that list outside the U.S. For days surrounding rank change announcements, trading volume is abnormally high for U.S. listed stocks, but remains unchanged for the foreign stock sample. Our findings are unchanged after controlling for unique valuation challenges, varying market conditions, beta, firm size, book-to-market, momentum, and post earnings announcement effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Prombutr, Wikrom & Lockwood, Jimmy & Zhang, Ying & Le, Steven V., 2016. "Investor response to online value line rank changes: Foreign versus local stocks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 10-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:30:y:2016:i:c:p:10-26
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2016.05.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028316300503
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2016.05.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    2. Patell, Jm, 1976. "Corporate Forecasts Of Earnings Per Share And Stock-Price Behavior - Empirical Tests," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 246-276.
    3. Moy, Ronald L. & Lee, Ahyee & Lee, Cheng F., 1995. "Bulls, bears, and value line's rankings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 179-187.
    4. Cowan, Arnold R. & Nayar, Nandkumar & Singh, Ajai K., 1990. "Stock Returns before and after Calls of Convertible Bonds," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 549-554, December.
    5. Stickel, Scott E., 1985. "The effect of value line investment survey rank changes on common stock prices," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 121-143, March.
    6. Copeland, Thomas E. & Mayers, David, 1982. "The value line enigma (1965-1978) : A case study of performance evaluation issues," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 289-321, November.
    7. Ying Zhang & Giao X. Nguyen & Steven V. Le, 2010. "Yes, The Value Line Enigma Is Still Alive: Evidence from Online Timeliness Rank Changes," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 355-373, May.
    8. John P. Shelton, 1967. "The Value Line Contest: A Test of Predictability of Stock-Price Changes," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 251-251.
    9. Philbrick, Dr & Ricks, We, 1991. "Using Value Line And Ibes Analyst Forecasts In Accounting Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 397-417.
    10. Broughton, John B & Chance, Don M, 1993. "The Value Line Enigma Extended: An Examination of the Performance of Option Recommendations," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(4), pages 541-568, October.
    11. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    12. Nandkumar Nayar & Ajai Singh & Wen Yu, 2011. "Unraveling a puzzle: the case of value line timeliness rank upgrades," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 25(4), pages 379-409, December.
    13. Szakmary, Andrew C. & Conover, C. Mitchell & Lancaster, Carol, 2008. "An examination of Value Line's long-term projections," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 820-833, May.
    14. Huberman, Gur & Kandel, Shmuel, 1987. "Value Line Rank and Firm Size," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(4), pages 577-589, October.
    15. Holloway, Clark, 1983. "Testing an Aggressive Investment Strategy Using Value Line Ranks: A Reply," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(1), pages 263-270, March.
    16. Choi, James J., 2000. "The Value Line Enigma: The Sum of Known Parts?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 485-498, September.
    17. Peterson, David R., 1995. "The Informative Role of the Value Line Investment Survey: Evidence from Stock Highlights," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 607-618, December.
    18. Holloway, Clark, 1981. "A Note on Testing an Aggressive Investment Strategy Using Value Line Ranks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 36(3), pages 711-719, June.
    19. Peterson, David R., 1987. "Security Price Reactions to Initial Reviews of Common Stock by the Value Line Investment Survey," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 483-494, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szakmary, Andrew C. & Conover, C. Mitchell & Lancaster, Carol, 2008. "An examination of Value Line's long-term projections," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 820-833, May.
    2. Nandkumar Nayar & Ajai Singh & Wen Yu, 2011. "Unraveling a puzzle: the case of value line timeliness rank upgrades," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 25(4), pages 379-409, December.
    3. Marcus Schulmerich & Yves-Michel Leporcher & Ching-Hwa Eu, 2015. "Stock Market Anomalies," Management for Professionals, in: Applied Asset and Risk Management, edition 127, chapter 3, pages 175-244, Springer.
    4. Fernando Rubio, 2005. "Eficiencia De Mercado, Administracion De Carteras De Fondos Y Behavioural Finance," Finance 0503028, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jul 2005.
    5. Lawrence D. Brown & Gordon D. Richardson & Charles A. Trzcinka, 1990. "Strong†form efficiency on the Toronto Stock Exchange: An examination of analyst price forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 323-346, September.
    6. P. R. Chandy & John W. Peavy III & William Reichenstein, 1993. "A Note On The Value Line Stock Highlight Effect," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 16(2), pages 171-179, June.
    7. Fich, Eliezer M. & Starks, Laura T. & Yore, Adam S., 2014. "CEO deal-making activities and compensation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 471-492.
    8. Thomas W. Hall & Jeffrey J. Tsay, 1988. "An Evaluation Of The Performance Of Portfolios Selected From Value Line Rank One Stocks: 1976–1982," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 11(3), pages 227-240, September.
    9. David K. Ding & Angie Low, 2004. "The Designation and Removal of Trustee Stock Status: Wealth Effects," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3‐4), pages 505-538, April.
    10. Moy, Ronald L. & Lee, Ahyee & Lee, Cheng F., 1995. "Bulls, bears, and value line's rankings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 179-187.
    11. David R. Peterson & Pamela P. Peterson, 1995. "Abnormal Returns And Analysts' Earnings Forecast Revisions Associated With The Publication Of “Stock Highlights” By Value Line Investment Survey," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 18(4), pages 465-477, December.
    12. Carol Anilowski Cain & Kalin S. Kolev & Sarah McVay, 2020. "Detecting Opportunistic Special Items," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2099-2119, May.
    13. Alexander S. Sangare, 2005. "Efficience des marchés : un siècle après Bachelier," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 81(4), pages 107-132.
    14. Ryan Flugum, 2021. "The trend is an analyst's friend: Analyst recommendations and market technicals," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(2), pages 301-330, May.
    15. Konstantina Kappou & Ioannis Oikonomou, 2016. "Is There a Gold Social Seal? The Financial Effects of Additions to and Deletions from Social Stock Indices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 533-552, February.
    16. Ahern, Kenneth R., 2009. "Sample selection and event study estimation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 466-482, June.
    17. Walker, M. Mark & Hatfield, Gay B., 1996. "Professional stock analysts' recommendations: Implications for individual investors," Financial Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 13-29.
    18. Wermers, Russ, 2006. "Performance evaluation with portfolio holdings information," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 207-230, August.
    19. Fink, Josef, 2021. "A review of the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    20. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Value Line ranking system; Analyst recommendations; Cross-listings; Market efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:30:y:2016:i:c:p:10-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.