IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v45y2010i2p355-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yes, The Value Line Enigma Is Still Alive: Evidence from Online Timeliness Rank Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhang
  • Giao X. Nguyen
  • Steven V. Le

Abstract

Beginning June 9, 2005, Value Line started announcing its Timeliness changes online at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, one day earlier than Friday noon's post‐delivery. We confirm that the Value Line effect still exists but shifts to Thursday in the Internet era. Unlike previous findings, the next‐day abnormal return after the announcement has disappeared, suggesting that the market efficiently priced the change. We find that a portfolio upgraded from rank 5 to 4 gains the highest cumulative abnormal return of 9.07% over a 50‐day window. Finally, we find that the post‐earnings announcement drift does not explain the Value Line enigma.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhang & Giao X. Nguyen & Steven V. Le, 2010. "Yes, The Value Line Enigma Is Still Alive: Evidence from Online Timeliness Rank Changes," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 355-373, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:45:y:2010:i:2:p:355-373
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00251.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00251.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00251.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fink, Josef, 2021. "A review of the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    2. repec:grz:wpsses:2020-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Prombutr, Wikrom & Lockwood, Jimmy & Zhang, Ying & Le, Steven V., 2016. "Investor response to online value line rank changes: Foreign versus local stocks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 10-26.
    4. Chih-Hsiang Chang, 2017. "Exploring stock recommenders’ behavior and recommendation receivers’ sophistication," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 41(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Marcus Schulmerich & Yves-Michel Leporcher & Ching-Hwa Eu, 2015. "Stock Market Anomalies," Management for Professionals, in: Applied Asset and Risk Management, edition 127, chapter 3, pages 175-244, Springer.
    6. Ryan Flugum, 2021. "The trend is an analyst's friend: Analyst recommendations and market technicals," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(2), pages 301-330, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:45:y:2010:i:2:p:355-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.