IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v53y2015icp1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Valente, Sandra
  • Coelho, Celeste
  • Ribeiro, Cristina
  • Liniger, Hanspeter
  • Schwilch, Gudrun
  • Figueiredo, Elisabete
  • Bachmann, Felicitas

Abstract

With the increasing pressure to improve the contribution of forests to help dealing with global changes, it is critical to understand the different perceptions of those involved in the forest. How do forest owners, managers and members of local communities who often depend on the forest, value it and what are the problems affecting the forests in terms of being able to meet these new challenges?

Suggested Citation

  • Valente, Sandra & Coelho, Celeste & Ribeiro, Cristina & Liniger, Hanspeter & Schwilch, Gudrun & Figueiredo, Elisabete & Bachmann, Felicitas, 2015. "How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:53:y:2015:i:c:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934115000040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dolisca, Frito & McDaniel, Josh M. & Teeter, Lawrence D., 2007. "Farmers' perceptions towards forests: A case study from Haiti," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 704-712, February.
    2. Elisabete Figueiredo & Sandra Valente & Celeste Coelho & Luísa Pinho, 2009. "Coping with risk: analysis on the importance of integrating social perceptions on flood risk into management mechanisms -- the case of the municipality of Águeda, Portugal," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 581-602, July.
    3. Elands, Birgit H. M. & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2001. "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 5-16, September.
    4. Elands, Birgit H. M. & O'Leary, Tomas N. & Boerwinkel, Henk W. J. & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 469-482, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filip Aggestam, 2024. "Through Smoke to Policy: Framing the EU Forest Fire Policy Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Marques, Marlene & Juerges, Nataly & Borges, José G., 2020. "Appraisal framework for actor interest and power analysis in forest management - Insights from Northern Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Alló, Maria & Loureiro, Maria L., 2016. "Evaluating the fulfillment of the principles of collective action in practice: A case study from Galicia (NW Spain)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Fernandes, Maria Eduarda & Simões, Paula, 2024. "Private forest owners' organizations adherence to policy tools. Insights from Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Canadas, Maria João & Leal, Miguel & Novais, Ana & Ribeiro, Paulo Flores & Santos, José Lima, 2024. "The current policy focus shift from a sectoral to a territorial governance of wildfire reduction is aligned with forest owners’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Valente, Marieta & Fernandes, Maria Eduarda & Pinto, Lígia Maria Costa, 2024. "Crowdfunding or crowdsourcing time: Exploring the willingness of private citizens to help prevent forest fires," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. D. Rodríguez-Rodríguez & P. Ibarra & M. Echeverría & J. Martínez-Vega, 2019. "Perceptions, attitudes and values of two key stakeholders on the oldest and newest Spanish national parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1053-1073, April.
    9. Rita Serra & Eugénia Rodrigues & Raúl García-Barrios, 2017. "Mushrooming Communities: A Field Guide to Mycology in the Community Forests of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Ancog, Rico C. & Florece, Leonardo M. & Nicopior, Ozzy Boy, 2016. "Fire occurrence and fire mitigation strategies in a grassland reforestation area in the Philippines," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galiana, Luis & Aguilar, Susana & Lázaro, Andrea, 2013. "An assessment of the effects of forest-related policies upon wildland fires in the European Union," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 36-44.
    2. McDonagh John & Farrell Maura & Mahon Marie & Ryan Mary, 2010. "New opportunities and cautionary steps? Farmers, forestry and rural development in Ireland," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 2(4), pages 236-251, January.
    3. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Pedro Cisneros-Saguilán & Felipe Gallardo-López & Silvia López-Ortiz & Octavio Ruiz-Rosado & José G. Herrera-Haro & Rafael Ruiz-Hernández, 2024. "Perception of the Sustainable Cattle Ranching Concept Among Producers, Extension Specialists, and Chief Officers in Oaxaca, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. YIlmaz, Bülent & Dasdemir, Ismet & Atmis, Erdogan & Lise, Wietze, 2010. "Factors affecting rural development in turkey: BartIn case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 239-249, April.
    6. Nora L. Álvarez-Berríos & Daniel J. Redo & T. Mitchell Aide & Matthew L. Clark & Ricardo Grau, 2013. "Land Change in the Greater Antilles between 2001 and 2010," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Westin, Kerstin & Bolte, Andreas & Haeler, Elena & Haltia, Emmi & Jandl, Robert & Juutinen, Artti & Kuhlmey, Katharina & Lidestav, Gun & Mäkipää, Raisa & Rosenkranz, Lydia & Triplat, Matevž & Skudnik,, 2023. "Forest values and application of different management activities among small-scale forest owners in five EU countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "The future of European forestry--between urbanization and rural development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 441-445, August.
    9. Cathal O'Donoghue & Cathal Geoghegan & Mary Ryan, 2014. "Chapter 05: The Irish Forestry Sector," Chapters from Rural Economic Development in Ireland, in: Rural Economic Development in Ireland, edition 1, chapter 5, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    10. Katarina Haugen, 2016. "Contested Lands? Dissonance and Common Ground in Stakeholder Views on Forest Values," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(4), pages 421-434, September.
    11. Jarský, Vilém & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Ventrubová, Kateřina & Sarvaš, Milan, 2014. "Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 380-395.
    12. Muhamad, Dendi & Okubo, Satoru & Harashina, Koji & Parikesit, & Gunawan, Budhi & Takeuchi, Kazuhiko, 2014. "Living close to forests enhances people׳s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 197-206.
    13. Minetos, Dionysios & Polyzos, Serafeim, 2010. "Deforestation processes in Greece: A spatial analysis by using an ordinal regression model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 457-472, July.
    14. Diep Thanh Tung & Le Thi Thu Diem & Do Xuan Luan & Nguyen Hoang Khanh Linh, 2022. "The National Target Program for New Rural Development in Vietnam: An Understanding of People’s Participation and Its Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Selby, Ashley & Koskela, Terhi & Petajisto, Leena, 2007. "Evidence of lay and professional forest-based development discourses in three contrasting regions of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 633-646, February.
    16. Elands, Birgit H. M. & O'Leary, Tomas N. & Boerwinkel, Henk W. J. & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 469-482, August.
    17. Manuschevich, Daniela, 2016. "Neoliberalization of forestry discourses in Chile," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 21-30.
    18. John T. Brady, 2012. "Health risk perceptions across time in the USA," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 547-563, June.
    19. Mohammad Chowdhury & Chloe Gudmundsson & Shigeyuki Izumiyama & Masao Koike & Nahid Nazia & Md. Rana & Sharif Mukul & Nur Muhammed & Mohammed Redowan, 2014. "Community attitudes toward forest conservation programs through collaborative protected area management in Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1235-1252, December.
    20. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:53:y:2015:i:c:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.