IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p924-d100192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mushrooming Communities: A Field Guide to Mycology in the Community Forests of Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Serra

    (Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Colégio de S. Jerónimo, Largo D. Dinis, Apartado 3087, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Eugénia Rodrigues

    (Baldios dos Lugares da Extinta Freguesia de Vilarinho, Lousã, Rua Sr. das Preces 8, 3200-407 Vilarinho LSA, Portugal)

  • Raúl García-Barrios

    (Regional Centre of Multidisciplinary Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. Universidad s/n, Circuito 2, Col. Chamilpa, Ciudad Universitaria de la UAEM, 62210 Cuernavaca, Morelos)

Abstract

Forest community connections are crucial to ensure forest stewardship and sustainability. We explored the potential of mushrooming to enable such connections in contexts where these connections have been historically broken, alienating local people from forests. Taking the case of the recent devolution of a community forest ( baldios ) in central Portugal to the local population, we present a five-year pilot project to rework mycology from a mushroom-centered approach to a mushroom-in- baldios approach. Mushrooms were used as an entry-point to connect the forest ecology with the challenges of governance and community building. The devised activities provided an opportunity for people inside and outside the local community to adventure into the woods and find out more about their socio-ecological history, develop communal and convivial relationships and engage in the responsible gathering of wild mushrooms. However, the hosting of mushroomers to know, value and engage with the community forest recovery has constantly worked against the enclosure of mushrooms to provide marketable forms of leisure. The outcome of these activities depends on the relationships established between mushrooms, mycologists, local administrators, commoners and poachers, all operating within a framework that favors the eradication of resources instead of long-term relationships that sustain places.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Serra & Eugénia Rodrigues & Raúl García-Barrios, 2017. "Mushrooming Communities: A Field Guide to Mycology in the Community Forests of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:924-:d:100192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carvalho Mendes, Americo M.S., 2006. "Implementation analysis of forest programmes: Some theoretical notes and an example," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 512-528, July.
    2. Valente, Sandra & Coelho, Celeste & Ribeiro, Cristina & Liniger, Hanspeter & Schwilch, Gudrun & Figueiredo, Elisabete & Bachmann, Felicitas, 2015. "How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, 2015. "The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10581.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nieto-Romero, M. & Parra, C. & Bock, B., 2021. "Re-building historical commons: How formal institutions affect participation in community forests in Galicia, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Copena, Damián & Pérez-Neira, David & Macías Vázquez, Alfredo & Simón, Xavier, 2022. "Community forest and mushrooms: Collective action initiatives in rural areas of Galicia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan van Duppen, 2021. "Book review: The Botanical City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1746-1750, June.
    2. Meagher, Kate, 2019. "Working in chains: African informal workers and global value chains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91590, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hervé Charmettant & Yvan Renou, 2021. "Cooperative conversion and communalization: Closely observed interactions between the material and the mental," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 55-77, March.
    4. Katherine Farley, 2022. "“We ain't never stolen a plant”: Livelihoods, property, and illegal ginseng harvesting in the Appalachian forest commons," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 309-321, June.
    5. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Megan Horst & Nathan McClintock & Adrien Baysse-Lainé & Ségolène Darly & Flaminia Paddeu & Coline Perrin & Kristin Reynolds & Christophe-Toussaint Soulard, 2021. "Translating land justice through comparison: a US–French dialogue and research agenda," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 865-880, December.
    7. Nieto-Romero, M. & Parra, C. & Bock, B., 2021. "Re-building historical commons: How formal institutions affect participation in community forests in Galicia, Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Valente, Marieta & Fernandes, Maria Eduarda & Pinto, Lígia Maria Costa, 2024. "Crowdfunding or crowdsourcing time: Exploring the willingness of private citizens to help prevent forest fires," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. repec:sae:envval:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:47-66 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Dominic Piacentini, 2021. "Beside the berm: The convenience of roadside picking," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 208-218, June.
    11. Caroline Faria & Vanessa A Massaro & Jill M Williams, 2020. "Feminist political geographies: Critical reflections, new directions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(7-8), pages 1149-1159, November.
    12. Letizia Bindi & Angelo Belliggiano, 2023. "A Highly Condensed Social Fact: Food Citizenship, Individual Responsibility, and Social Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Janet McIntyre‐Mills, 2020. "The COVID‐19 era: No longer business as usual," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 827-838, September.
    14. Rosine Kelz & Henrike Knappe, 2021. "Politics of Time and Mourning in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    15. The Re‐Arrangements Collective & Fabien Cante & Ajmal Hussain & Timo Makori & Surer Qassim Mohamed & Alana Osbourne & Francesca Pilo’ & Kavita Ramakrishnan & AbdouMaliq Simone & Rike Sitas & Adeem Suh, 2023. "MOVEMENT 2. FORMALIZING ARRANGEMENTS: Re‐signification and the Making of Governable Spaces," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 471-482, May.
    16. Popan, Cosmin & Anaya-Boig, Esther, 2021. "The intersectional precarity of platform cycle delivery workers," SocArXiv tk6v8, Center for Open Science.
    17. Lisa Alvarado, 2019. "Institutional Change on a Conservationist Frontier: Local Responses to a Grabbing Process in the Name of Environmental Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Katharine Legun & Karly Ann Burch & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Can a robot be an expert? The social meaning of skill and its expression through the prospect of autonomous AgTech," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 501-517, June.
    19. Kirsten Francescone, 2019. "Tracing indium production to the mines of the Cerro Rico de Potosí," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 110-122, January.
    20. Eriksson Madeleine & Tollefsen Aina, 2018. "The production of the rural landscape and its labour: The development of supply chain capitalism in the Swedish berry industry," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 40(40), pages 69-82, June.
    21. Claudia Matus & Pascale Bussenius & Pablo Herraz & Valentina Riberi & Manuel Prieto, 2021. "Nature Is for Trees, Culture Is for Humans: A Critical Reading of the IPCC Report," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-9, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:924-:d:100192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.