IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v62y2016i3id94-2015-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relation between selected indicators of forest stand diversity and quality of timber production in managed Central European forests

Author

Listed:
  • J. Merganič

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • K. Merganičová

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • R. Marušák

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • L. Tipmann

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • L. Šálek

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • L. Dragoun

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • R. Stolariková

    (Department of Forest Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The present study examines the relationship between the quality of timber production and the species and structural diversity of forest stands. The data used came from a regional forest inventory of the University Forest Enterprise "Kostelec nad Černými lesy", Czech Republic. The inventory was performed from 2009 to 2011 on 1,188 sample plots that represented 86 strata defined by the combination of three variables: site (5 categories), age (12 categories) and canopy cover (5 categories). On each sample plot, we quantified 171 partial biodiversity indicators that represented species or structural diversity. The quality of timber production was specified by four indicators quantified using local assortment tables. In total, we analysed 58,824 univariate linear regressions describing the relationships between diversity indicators and timber quality in individual strata. The results revealed that their relationship changes with stand age. The proportion of the best-quality assortments increases with the increasing species richness in all age categories.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Merganič & K. Merganičová & R. Marušák & L. Tipmann & L. Šálek & L. Dragoun & R. Stolariková, 2016. "Relation between selected indicators of forest stand diversity and quality of timber production in managed Central European forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 97-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:62:y:2016:i:3:id:94-2015-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/94/2015-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/94/2015-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/94/2015-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/94/2015-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elands, Birgit H. M. & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2001. "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 5-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.
    2. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Frei, Theresa & Derks, Jakob & Rodríguez Fernández-Blanco, Carmen & Winkel, Georg, 2020. "Narrating abandoned land: Perceptions of natural forest regrowth in Southwestern Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Arts, Bas, 2012. "Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 7-13.
    5. Sarvašová, Zuzana & Ali, Tamás & Đorđević, Ilija & Lukmine, Diana & Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Hrib, Michal & Rondeux, Jacques & Mantzanas, Konstantinos T. & Franz, Kristin, 2019. "Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 - a comparative view," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-135.
    6. Westin, Kerstin & Holm, Einar, 2018. "Do trees make people more rooted? Private forest owners' migration behaviour," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 11-20.
    7. YIlmaz, Bülent & Dasdemir, Ismet & Atmis, Erdogan & Lise, Wietze, 2010. "Factors affecting rural development in turkey: BartIn case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 239-249, April.
    8. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "The future of European forestry--between urbanization and rural development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 441-445, August.
    9. Katarina Haugen, 2016. "Contested Lands? Dissonance and Common Ground in Stakeholder Views on Forest Values," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(4), pages 421-434, September.
    10. Jarský, Vilém & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Ventrubová, Kateřina & Sarvaš, Milan, 2014. "Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 380-395.
    11. Kassioumis, K. & Papageorgiou, K. & Christodoulou, Ath. & Blioumis, V. & Stamou, N. & Karameris, Ath., 2004. "Rural development by afforestation in predominantly agricultural areas: issues and challenges from two areas in Greece," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 483-496, August.
    12. Minetos, Dionysios & Polyzos, Serafeim, 2010. "Deforestation processes in Greece: A spatial analysis by using an ordinal regression model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 457-472, July.
    13. Leipold, Sina, 2014. "Creating forests with words — A review of forest-related discourse studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 12-20.
    14. Valente, Sandra & Coelho, Celeste & Ribeiro, Cristina & Liniger, Hanspeter & Schwilch, Gudrun & Figueiredo, Elisabete & Bachmann, Felicitas, 2015. "How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Galiana, Luis & Aguilar, Susana & Lázaro, Andrea, 2013. "An assessment of the effects of forest-related policies upon wildland fires in the European Union," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 36-44.
    16. Marianna Markantoni & Sierdjan Koster & Dirk Strijker & Mike Woolvin, 2013. "Contributing to a Vibrant Countryside? The Impact of Side Activities on Rural Development," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(3), pages 292-307, July.
    17. Selby, Ashley & Koskela, Terhi & Petajisto, Leena, 2007. "Evidence of lay and professional forest-based development discourses in three contrasting regions of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 633-646, February.
    18. Roos, Anders & Eggers, Jeannette & Mark-Herbert, Cecilia & Lindhagen, Anders, 2018. "Using von Thünen rings and service-dominant logic in balancing forest ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 622-632.
    19. Elands, Birgit H. M. & O'Leary, Tomas N. & Boerwinkel, Henk W. J. & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 469-482, August.
    20. Manuschevich, Daniela, 2016. "Neoliberalization of forestry discourses in Chile," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 21-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:62:y:2016:i:3:id:94-2015-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.