IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v1y2000i3-4p195-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Gluck, Peter

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gluck, Peter, 2000. "Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 195-207, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:1:y:2000:i:3-4:p:195-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(00)00014-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Sabatier, Paul A., 1994. "Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 175-203, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. BALESTRA, Carlotta & BRECHET, Thierry & LAMBRECHT, Stéphane, 2010. "Property rights with biological spillovers: when Hardin meets Meade," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2010071, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-04689665 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2020. "Who has the better story? On the narrative foundations of agricultural development dichotomies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Jungrav-Gieorgica, Natalia, 2020. "Narrative Policy Framework - polityka publiczna jako walka opowieści," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Adam Wellstead, 2017. "Plus ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose? A review of Paul Sabatier’s “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 549-561, December.
    5. Albert Weale, 2010. "Political Theory and Practical Public Reasoning," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(2), pages 266-281, March.
    6. Hirschl, Bernd, 2009. "International renewable energy policy--between marginalization and initial approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4407-4416, November.
    7. Tal, Gil & Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit, 2011. "Understanding the role of the forecast-maker in overestimation forecasts of policy impacts: The case of Travel Demand Management policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 389-400, June.
    8. Veenswijk, Marcel & Koerten, Henk & Poot, Jaap, 2012. "Unravelling Organizational Consequences of PSI Reform - An In-depth Study of the Organizational Impact of the Reuse of Public Sector Data," Discussion Papers 1275, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    9. Munira, Syarifah Liza & Fritzen, Scott A., 2007. "What influences government adoption of vaccines in developing countries? A policy process analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1751-1764, October.
    10. Ribeiro, F., 2017. "The accidental Trojan horse: Plea bargaining as an anticorruption tool in Brazil," ISS Working Papers - General Series 627, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    11. David M. Elcott & J. Andrew Sinclair, 2017. "Flexibility in American religious life: an exploration of loyalty and purity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 649-673, December.
    12. Deppermann, Andre & Offermann, Frank & Puttkammer, Judith & Grethe, Harald, 2016. "EU biofuel policies: Income effects and lobbying decisions in the German agricultural sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 259-265.
    13. Federico Holm & Ramiro Berardo, 2020. "Coalitional Architecture of Climate Change Litigation Networks in the United States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 797-822, November.
    14. Lorena Torres Bernardino, 2018. "Openings for public policy in the water rights," Post-Print halshs-02055418, HAL.
    15. Poljak Željko, 2018. "Advocacy Coalitions in Transport Policy: A Case of Rail Sector in Croatia," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 41-56, June.
    16. Mockshell, J. & Birner, R., 2018. "The dichotomy between state- and market-oriented agricultural development narratives: Beyond the rational choice explanation?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277272, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Jean-Philippe Berrou & Alain Piveteau & Thibaud Deguilhem & Delpy Léo & Claire Gondard-Delcroix, 2020. "Qui pilote si personne ne gouverne ? La politique publique de protection sociale à Madagascar au prisme de l’analyse des réseaux sociaux," Working Papers hal-02918286, HAL.
    18. Jokinen, Pekka & Aakkula, Jyrki & Kroger, Laura, 2009. "Multifunctionality and policy learning in the finnish agri-environmental policy subsystem: A multilevel governance perspective," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 6, pages 1-20.
    19. Isaksson, Karolina & Antonson, Hans & Eriksson, Linnea, 2017. "Layering and parallel policy making – Complementary concepts for understanding implementation challenges related to sustainable mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 50-57.
    20. Rugema, Didier Milindi & Birhanu, Tadesse Amsalu & Shibeshi, Gebeyehu Belay, 2022. "Analysing land policy processes with stages model: Land policy cases of Ethiopia and Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    21. Alexandra‐Maria Bocse, 2021. "Relational Power, Brokers and Influence: A Study on the Controversial Issue of Fracking in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1267-1283, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:1:y:2000:i:3-4:p:195-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.