IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/dpaper/1275.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unravelling Organizational Consequences of PSI Reform - An In-depth Study of the Organizational Impact of the Reuse of Public Sector Data

Author

Listed:
  • Veenswijk, Marcel
  • Koerten, Henk
  • Poot, Jaap

Abstract

The success of Google Maps suggests that free access to public sector information (PSI) contributes to a prosperous economy. While there has been considerable attention for legal and economical considerations concerning the implications of policies on public sector information (PSI), also labeled as open data (OD), organizational consequences regarding the nature and shape of the public sector are hardly anticipated. We focus on organizational settings by comparing policies and outcomes of PSI reuse in EU member states and are looking into distinct market sectors within the European realm by making analyses of both a Dutch national case and a cross-national case. In many discussions on PSI reuse, government is treated as a unitary phenomenon with a single voice. We found considerable differences among EU member states concerning the implementation of PSI policies and that there are indications that they are connected to the nature of the public sector in a specific state. Furthermore, we discovered that where specific actions stimulate the creation of arenas of opportunity with both public and private parties gathered around a specific information theme, new innovative arrangements emerge. Therefore we suggest that policies on PSI reuse to stimulate economic prosperity should be aimed at creating arenas of public and private organizations gathered around specific PSI themes. This will stimulate PSB organizations to engage actively in arrangements with multiple private organizations to develop new forms of reuse. When national government develops policies aimed simply at disclosing PSI without paying attention to the development of PSI reuse arenas, it runs the risk of unleashing narratives of control within the public sector, preventing them from releasing the innovative potential that PSI reuse intrinsically has.

Suggested Citation

  • Veenswijk, Marcel & Koerten, Henk & Poot, Jaap, 2012. "Unravelling Organizational Consequences of PSI Reform - An In-depth Study of the Organizational Impact of the Reuse of Public Sector Data," Discussion Papers 1275, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:rif:dpaper:1275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/dp1275.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koski, Heli, 2011. "Does Marginal Cost Pricing of Public Sector Information Spur Firm Growth?," Discussion Papers 1260, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Sabatier, Paul A., 1994. "Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 175-203, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-04689665 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2021. "Agricultural Policy Processes: Influential Actors, Policy Networks and Competing Narratives," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315323, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Diana Pamela Villa Alvarez & Valentina Auricchio & Marzia Mortati, 2022. "Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 89-136, March.
    4. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2020. "Who has the better story? On the narrative foundations of agricultural development dichotomies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Jean-Philippe Berrou & Alain Piveteau & Thibaud Deguilhem & Leo Delpy & Claire Gondard-Delcroix, 2021. "Who Drives if No-one Governs? A Social Network Analysis of Social Protection Policy in Madagascar," Working Papers hal-03180029, HAL.
    6. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2015. "Donors and domestic policy makers: Two worlds in agricultural policy-making?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Morando, Federico & Iemma, Raimondo & Basso, Simone, 2013. "Is there such a thing as free government data?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 2(4), pages 1-8.
    8. Jungrav-Gieorgica, Natalia, 2020. "Narrative Policy Framework - polityka publiczna jako walka opowieści," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Gluck, Peter, 2000. "Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 195-207, December.
    10. Thumm, Alex Jürgen & Perl, Anthony, 2020. "Puzzling over parking: Assessing the transitional parking requirement in Vancouver, British Columbia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 85-101.
    11. Adam Wellstead, 2017. "Plus ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose? A review of Paul Sabatier’s “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 549-561, December.
    12. Albert Weale, 2010. "Political Theory and Practical Public Reasoning," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(2), pages 266-281, March.
    13. Hirschl, Bernd, 2009. "International renewable energy policy--between marginalization and initial approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4407-4416, November.
    14. Tal, Gil & Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit, 2011. "Understanding the role of the forecast-maker in overestimation forecasts of policy impacts: The case of Travel Demand Management policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 389-400, June.
    15. Watkins, Andrew & Papaioannou, Theo & Mugwagwa, Julius & Kale, Dinar, 2015. "National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1407-1418.
    16. Munira, Syarifah Liza & Fritzen, Scott A., 2007. "What influences government adoption of vaccines in developing countries? A policy process analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1751-1764, October.
    17. Papaioannou, Theo & Watkins, Andrew & Mugwagwa, Julius & Kale, Dinar, 2016. "To Lobby or to Partner? Investigating the Shifting Political Strategies of Biopharmaceutical Industry Associations in Innovation Systems of South Africa and India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 66-79.
    18. Tomohiko Ohno & Naoko Hirayama & Keito Mineo & Kengo Iwata & Izumi Inasawa, 2022. "The advocacy coalition framework in Japan: Contributions to policy process studies and the challenges involved," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(1), pages 32-50, January.
    19. Wilson, Kumanan & Graham, Ian & Ricketts, Maura & Dornan, Christopher & Laupacis, Andreas & Hebert, Paul, 2007. "Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and the Canadian blood system after the tainted blood tragedy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 174-185, January.
    20. Ribeiro, F., 2017. "The accidental Trojan horse: Plea bargaining as an anticorruption tool in Brazil," ISS Working Papers - General Series 627, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    21. David M. Elcott & J. Andrew Sinclair, 2017. "Flexibility in American religious life: an exploration of loyalty and purity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 649-673, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:dpaper:1275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.