IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v94y2022ics0149718922000805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring unplanned sexual health curricula adaptations: Using results to improve fidelity and support implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Decker, Martha J.
  • Price, Melisa
  • Unti, Lisa
  • Firpo-Triplett, Regina
  • Atyam, Tara
  • Spitzer, Jason
  • Coyle, Karin

Abstract

Maintaining fidelity to an evidence-based curriculum is important, yet educators may need to adapt to unexpected situations or particular contexts. The purpose of this study is to identify the reasons for unplanned adaptations during implementation of an evidence-based sexual health education program in California. Evaluators reviewed fidelity checklists from the implementation of 571 cohorts for activities with reported unplanned adaptations. Reasons were qualitatively coded and compared across two phases of implementation and by setting. Educators reported 319 unplanned adaptations, affecting 21.5% of the 571 cohorts and 2.9% of 13,782 activities. The most common reasons for unplanned adaptations were due to time management issues, site logistic issues, and to increase participant engagement. Over time, health educators reported fewer unplanned adaptations, particularly those due to time management, resulting in a decrease in the cohorts and activities affected. Adaptations to evidence-based curricula are necessary and often occur during implementation to fit local conditions and populations. Ongoing review of adaptation data provides an opportunity to refine training and technical assistance efforts. Guidance about the types of permitted adaptations and how to anticipate and plan for adaptations for future implementation can ensure fidelity to the core curriculum components and responsiveness to youth participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Decker, Martha J. & Price, Melisa & Unti, Lisa & Firpo-Triplett, Regina & Atyam, Tara & Spitzer, Jason & Coyle, Karin, 2022. "Monitoring unplanned sexual health curricula adaptations: Using results to improve fidelity and support implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000805
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000805
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbee, Anita P. & Antle, Becky & Langley, Cheri & Cunningham, Michael R. & Whiteside, Danielle & Sar, Bibhuti K. & Archuleta, Adrian & Karam, Eli & Borders, Kevin, 2021. "How to ensure fidelity in implementing an evidence based teen pregnancy prevention curriculum," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Escribano, Silvia & Espada, José P. & Orgilés, Mireia & Morales, Alexandra, 2016. "Implementation fidelity for promoting the effectiveness of an adolescent sexual health program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 81-87.
    3. Campa, M.I. & Leff, S.Z. & Tufts, M., 2018. "Reaching high-need youth populations with evidence-based sexual health education in California," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108, pages 32-37.
    4. Goulet, Mélissa & Archambault, Isabelle & Janosz, Michel & Christenson, Sandra L., 2018. "Evaluating the implementation of Check & Connect in various school settings: Is intervention fidelity necessarily associated with positive outcomes?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 34-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goulet, Mélissa & Archambault, Isabelle & Janosz, Michel & Bélanger, Jean & Christenson, Sandra L., 2020. "Understanding the dynamic interinfluences of implementation processes: An illustration by multiple case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Abby C. King & Feyisayo A. Odunitan-Wayas & Moushumi Chaudhury & Maria Alejandra Rubio & Michael Baiocchi & Tracy Kolbe-Alexander & Felipe Montes & Ann Banchoff & Olga Lucia Sarmiento & Katarina Bälte, 2021. "Community-Based Approaches to Reducing Health Inequities and Fostering Environmental Justice through Global Youth-Engaged Citizen Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Morales, Alexandra & Garcia-Montaño, Eileen & Barrios-Ortega, Cristian & Niebles-Charris, Janivys & Garcia-Roncallo, Paola & Abello-Luque, Daniella & Gomez-Lugo, Mayra & Saavedra, Diego Alejandro & Va, 2019. "Adaptation of an effective school-based sexual health promotion program for youth in Colombia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 207-215.
    5. Fernández-Martínez, Iván & Orgilés, Mireia & Espada, José P. & Essau, Cecilia A. & Morales, Alexandra, 2021. "Effects as a function of implementation fidelity of a transdiagnostic prevention program in young school-aged children," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Taylor, Rebecca J. & Shade, Kate & Lowry, Sarah J. & Ahrens, Kym, 2020. "Evaluation of reproductive health education in transition-age youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Ángela Antúnez & María del Henar Pérez-Herrero & Pedro Rosário & Guillermo Vallejo & José Carlos Núñez, 2020. "Engagement SPIRALS in Elementary Students: A School-Based Self-Regulated Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Betzabé Torres-Cortés & Loreto Leiva & Katia Canenguez & Marcia Olhaberry & Emmanuel Méndez, 2023. "Shared Components of Worldwide Successful Sexuality Education Interventions for Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.