IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v80y2020ics0149718918303860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the dynamic interinfluences of implementation processes: An illustration by multiple case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Goulet, Mélissa
  • Archambault, Isabelle
  • Janosz, Michel
  • Bélanger, Jean
  • Christenson, Sandra L.

Abstract

Many dropout prevention programs have been developed and validated in the past decades. Yet, little is known about the contextual factors influencing the implementation of these programs. Implementation processes, such as school principal leadership and governmental funding, have been identified for their influence on program implementation, but the mutual or dynamic influence of these processes is yet to be understood. This study examines the processes involved in the implementation of Check & Connect (C&C), a well-established targeted dropout prevention program validated in several countries that aims at promoting the development of a significant relationship between at-risk students and a mentor as a way to prevent school dropout.

Suggested Citation

  • Goulet, Mélissa & Archambault, Isabelle & Janosz, Michel & Bélanger, Jean & Christenson, Sandra L., 2020. "Understanding the dynamic interinfluences of implementation processes: An illustration by multiple case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s0149718918303860
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718918303860
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goulet, Mélissa & Archambault, Isabelle & Janosz, Michel & Christenson, Sandra L., 2018. "Evaluating the implementation of Check & Connect in various school settings: Is intervention fidelity necessarily associated with positive outcomes?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 34-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abby C. King & Feyisayo A. Odunitan-Wayas & Moushumi Chaudhury & Maria Alejandra Rubio & Michael Baiocchi & Tracy Kolbe-Alexander & Felipe Montes & Ann Banchoff & Olga Lucia Sarmiento & Katarina Bälte, 2021. "Community-Based Approaches to Reducing Health Inequities and Fostering Environmental Justice through Global Youth-Engaged Citizen Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Ángela Antúnez & María del Henar Pérez-Herrero & Pedro Rosário & Guillermo Vallejo & José Carlos Núñez, 2020. "Engagement SPIRALS in Elementary Students: A School-Based Self-Regulated Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Decker, Martha J. & Price, Melisa & Unti, Lisa & Firpo-Triplett, Regina & Atyam, Tara & Spitzer, Jason & Coyle, Karin, 2022. "Monitoring unplanned sexual health curricula adaptations: Using results to improve fidelity and support implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s0149718918303860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.