IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v94y2022ics0149718922000799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating facilitators’ challenges administering a program building on existing strengths in families facing difficulties

Author

Listed:
  • Hamel, Sylvie
  • Lacharité, Carl
  • Lepage, Andrée-Anne
  • Pellerin, Maud
  • Gélinas, Annie
  • Montambeault, Jean
  • Chicoine, Chantal

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to understand the challenges faced by 12 facilitators (9 women and 3 men) of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) implemented in the Adélard-Dugré and Jean-Nicolet neighbourhoods of Trois-Rivières, Quebec. This objective was operationalized as the following question: How did facilitators manage to buy in to, and align themselves with, program principles while avoiding an expert stance and remaining focused on participating families’ strengths? This question has not been investigated before in connection with the SFP program. This study was conducted between 2011 and 2014, and relied on semi-annual group interviews. The results indicate that facilitators’ first step was to acknowledge their expectations. Once they had accomplished this, they were able to let go and distance themselves from an expert stance. This allowed them to recognize the benefits flowing from application of the program’s principles, and understand how they could repurpose their expertise for intervention with program participants. Facilitators also came to realize that they had developed strong relationships with the families and better understood the latter’s realities. Finally, this article explores the implications of the results, both for practice (in terms of program compliance) and research (in terms of program evaluation).

Suggested Citation

  • Hamel, Sylvie & Lacharité, Carl & Lepage, Andrée-Anne & Pellerin, Maud & Gélinas, Annie & Montambeault, Jean & Chicoine, Chantal, 2022. "Evaluating facilitators’ challenges administering a program building on existing strengths in families facing difficulties," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000799
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000799
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brook, Jody & McDonald, Thomas P. & Yan, Yueqi, 2012. "An analysis of the impact of the Strengthening Families Program on family reunification in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 691-695.
    2. Nathalie Krief & Véronique Zardet, 2013. "Analyse de données qualitatives et recherche-intervention," Post-Print hal-00914102, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thibaut Duboisy, 2022. "La coopération des acteurs salariés et bénévoles -Cas d'un service mixte au sein d'un organisme associatif bailleur social," Post-Print hal-03721695, HAL.
    2. Noura Zaghmouri & Didier Poivret & Emeline, Mudric, 2024. "Territorial professional health communities and advanced practice nurses: levers for building care pathways from a city-hospital perspective [Les communautés professionnelles territoriales de santé," Post-Print hal-04635806, HAL.
    3. Balsells, Maria Àngels & Pastor, Crescencia & Mateos, Ainoa & Vaquero, Eduard & Urrea, Aida, 2015. "Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 159-166.
    4. Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle & Brook, Jody & Yan, Yueqi & McDonald, Thomas P., 2013. "Cost analysis of the strengthening families program in reducing time to family reunification among substance-affected families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 244-252.
    5. Nese, Rhonda N.T. & Anderson, Cynthia M. & Ruppert, Traci & Fisher, Philip A., 2016. "Effects of a video feedback parent training program during child welfare visitation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 266-276.
    6. Caroline Tahar, 2016. "Quel pilotage pour des activités de service plus performantes ? Le cas du contrôle du Revenue Management," Post-Print hal-01900497, HAL.
    7. Debra A. Strong & Russell Cole & Angela V. D'Angelo & Juliette Henke, "undated". "2012 and 2014 Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-Being of and to Improve the Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse: Third Annual Report to Congress," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 25fb6c26bc6a435fbfa9abfd8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Thibaut Duboisy, 2021. "Articulation entre pratiques de management et statut (salarié, volontaire, bénévole)," Post-Print halshs-03408806, HAL.
    9. Céline Duplaà Hemer & Sylvie Rascol-Boutard, 2019. "Une Recherche-Action Pour Détecter Des Compétences Hypermodernes : Le Cas Du Manager De Proximité Dans Le Secteur Bancaire," Post-Print hal-02289759, HAL.
    10. Fischer, Sierra & Harris, Elizabeth & Smith, Hailey S. & Polivka, Rachel J., 2020. "Family visit coaching: Improvement in parenting skills through coached visitation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Pierce, Barbara J. & Muzzey, Finneran K. & Bloomquist, Kori R. & Imburgia, Teresa M., 2022. "Effectiveness of Family Centered Treatment on reunification and days in care: Propensity score matched sample from Indiana child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Nlend Nkott, Anny Lucrèce & Temple, Ludovic, 2021. "Societal acceptability conditions of genome editing for upland rice in Madagascar," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Bai, Rong & Collins, Cyleste & Fischer, Robert & Crampton, David, 2023. "Facilitators and barriers to reunification among housing unstable families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Virginie Noireaux & François Cassière, 2021. "Co-construction d’un design logistique des circuits courts en territoire rural : le cas de Saint-Flour Communauté," Post-Print hal-03420491, HAL.
    15. Elizabeth Eggins & David B. Wilson & Joseph Betts & Sara Roetman & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Bronwyn Theroux & Sharon Dawe, 2024. "Psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    16. Lecompte, Vanessa & Pascuzzo, Katherine & Hélie, Sonia, 2023. "A look inside family reunification for children with attachment difficulties: An exploratory study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Clara Aoun, 2021. "La GRH-Territoriale : une innovation sociale pour l'emploi dans les métiers des SAP," Post-Print hal-03377394, HAL.
    18. Thibaut Duboisy, 2024. "La coopération des acteurs salariés et bénévoles en associations - Cas de 60000 rebonds," Post-Print hal-04683408, HAL.
    19. Makry Hajar & Bakasse Mina, 2023. "The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education Program on Entrepreneurial Intention: Case of Sidi Bennour Polydisciplinary Faculty," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-2.
    20. Jedwab, Merav & Chatterjee, Anusha & Shaw, Terry V., 2018. "Caseworkers' insights and experiences with successful reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 56-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.