IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v69y2018icp118-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardizing evaluation process: Necessary for achieving SDGs – A case study of India

Author

Listed:
  • Srivastava, Alok

Abstract

A set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in September 2015 are to be implemented and achieved in every country from the year 2016 to 2030. In Indian context, all these goals are very relevant and critical, as India missed the target on many components of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The author strongly feels that one of the key reasons was lack of an in-built robust system for measuring the progress and achievements of MDGs. Monitoring and Evaluation of programmes and schemes, aiming at different SDGs, in a robust and regular manner is therefore need of the hour. A National evaluation policy (NEP) would set the tone in the right direction from the very beginning for achieving SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Srivastava, Alok, 2018. "Standardizing evaluation process: Necessary for achieving SDGs – A case study of India," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 118-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:118-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917303464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementatio GOI, 2015. "Millennium Development goals India Country Report- 2015," Working Papers id:6719, eSocialSciences.
    2. Santosh Mehrotra, 2013. "The Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in India : A Work in Progress," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 19000.
    3. Ministry of Statistics and Prog Implementation (MOSPI), 2015. "Millennium Development Goals India Country Report 2011," Working Papers id:6752, eSocialSciences.
    4. John Blomquist, 2003. "Impact Evaluation of Social Programs : A Policy Perspective," World Bank Publications - Reports 11827, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Yanyan & Norris, Catherine Benoît & Lenzen, Manfred & Norris, Gregory & Murray, Joy, 2017. "How Social Footprints of Nations Can Assist in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-65.
    2. Schöll, Michaela, 2017. "Three Essays on Sustainable Supply Chain Management – Towards Sustainable Supplier Selection and Sustainable Sourcing," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 172463, September.
    3. Marphatia, Akanksha A. & Reid, Alice M. & Yajnik, Chittaranjan S., 2019. "Developmental origins of secondary school dropout in rural India and its differential consequences by sex: A biosocial life-course analysis," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 8-23.
    4. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    5. Franziska Gassmann & Daphne Francois & Lorena Zardo Trindade, 2015. "Improving Labor Market Outcomes for Poor and Vulnerable Groups in Mongolia," World Bank Publications - Reports 23671, The World Bank Group.
    6. Margaret Grosh & Carlo del Ninno & Emil Tesliuc & Azedine Ouerghi, 2008. "For Protection and Promotion : The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6582.
    7. A. V. Vijaya Bhaskar & D. J. Nithya & S. Raju & R. V. Bhavani, 2017. "Establishing integrated agriculture-nutrition programmes to diversify household food and diets in rural India," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 981-999, October.
    8. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana & Khan, Amir Ullah, 2018. "Macro Economy and Health in India," MPRA Paper 84512, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:118-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.