IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v54y2016icp11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms

Author

Listed:
  • Yusa, Anna
  • Hynie, Michaela
  • Mitchell, Scott

Abstract

Internal evaluations are numerous but the literature is largely focused on external evaluations. There have been few explorations of the factors affecting the use of findings from internal evaluations that are carried out by program staff in community organizations. This study examined the instrumental use of internal evaluation findings within 19 community mental health organizations in Ontario, Canada. All but one respondent reported instrumental use in their organization, using the evaluation findings to make program-related decisions. For these non-controversial programs, qualities such as the ability of internal evaluators to identify relevant information, their role/expertise within the organization and the consistency of evaluation findings with current understanding appeared to influence use more strongly than evaluator objectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusa, Anna & Hynie, Michaela & Mitchell, Scott, 2016. "Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.09.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915001081
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.09.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Preskill, Hallie, 1994. "Evaluation's role in enhancing organizational learning: A model for practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 291-297.
    2. Winberg, Alan, 1991. "Maximizing the contribution of internal evaluation units," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 167-172, January.
    3. Turnbull, B., 1999. "The mediating effect of participation efficacy on evaluation use," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 131-140, May.
    4. Stijn M. J. van Osselaer & Chris Janiszewski, 2012. "A Goal-Based Model of Product Evaluation and Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 260-292.
    5. Lyon, Eleanor, 1989. "In-house research: A consideration of roles and advantages," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 241-248, January.
    6. Goering, Paula N. & Wasylenki, Donald A., 1993. "Promoting the utilization of outcome study results by assuming multiple roles within an organization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 329-334.
    7. Varios, 2012. "Lecturas sobre derecho del medio ambiente t. XII," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, edition 1, volume 1, number 602.
    8. Kausik Chaudhuri & Tirthankar Chowdhury, 2012. "Financial Performance Evaluation," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 11(1), pages 1-36, April.
    9. Sonnichsen, Richard C., 1988. "Advocacy evaluation: A model for internal evaluation offices," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 141-148, January.
    10. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michelle C White & Linden S Baxter & Kristin L Close & Vaonandianina A Ravelojaona & Hasiniaina N Rakotoarison & Emily Bruno & Alison Herbert & Vanessa Andean & James Callahan & Hery H Andriamanjato &, 2018. "Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Wingate, Lori A. & Smith, Nick L. & Perk, Emma, 2018. "The project vita: A dynamic knowledge management tool," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 22-27.
    3. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane, 2018. "The influence of evaluation recommendations on instrumental and conceptual uses: A preliminary analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 13-18.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minnett, Ann M., 1999. "Internal evaluation in a self-reflective organization: one nonprofit agency's model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 353-362, August.
    2. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    3. Gagnon, France & Aubry, Tim & Cousins, J. Bradley & Goh, Swee C. & Elliott, Catherine, 2018. "Validation of the evaluation capacity in organizations questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 166-175.
    4. Fox, Alan & McDermott, Fiona & Hamilton, Margaret & Toumbourou, John, 1996. "Insider/partnership evaluation: Approach and concept development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 199-207, August.
    5. Long, James H. & Basoglu, K. Asli, 2016. "The impact of task interruption on tax accountants' professional judgment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-113.
    6. Luis Fernando Hernández Betancur, 2016. "La Ley de Infraestructura de Transporte y la preservación “a toda costa” del interés viario. Estudio de las licencias especiales para el desarrollo de vías de interés particular y el asiento de redes ," Contexto (Artículos Sobre Economía), Universidad Externado de Colombia, February.
    7. Madden Ciarán, 2020. "A brief exploration of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service’s (IGEES) outputs and its role in Department of Children and Youth Affairs policymaking," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(2), pages 81-96, May.
    8. Daigneault, Pierre-Marc, 2014. "Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 171-181.
    9. Blaser Mapitsa, Caitlin & Chirau, Takunda J., 2019. "Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-42.
    10. Joffre Swait & Cristiano Franceschinis & Mara Thiene, 2020. "Antecedent Volition and Spatial Effects: Can Multiple Goal Pursuit Mitigate Distance Decay?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(2), pages 243-270, February.
    11. Barbara Kożuch & Adam Jabłoński, 2018. "The Strategic Hybrids of Water Supply Companies as an Effective Management Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-43, November.
    12. Juan Carlos Henao (Editor) & Sebastián Díaz Ángel (Editor), 2016. "Minería y desarrollo. Tomo 5: historia y gobierno del territorio minero," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 881.
    13. Rogers, Alison F. & Kelly, Leanne M. & McCoy, Alicia, 2019. "Pathways to becoming an internal evaluator: Perspectives from the Australian non-government sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 102-109.
    14. Xinni Wei & Feng Yu, 2022. "Envy and Environmental Decision Making: The Mediating Role of Self-Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Juan Carlos Henao (Editor) & Ana Carolina González Espinosa (Editor), 2016. "Minería y desarrollo. Tomo 4: Minería y comunidades: impactos, conflictos y participación ciudadana," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 880.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6b7kf1issd8leb93o27ofdm8cu is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Hsin-Hsien Liu & Hsuan-Yi Chou, 2022. "Attribute specification effect on hedonic and utilitarian options," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 322-341, May.
    18. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    19. Valérie Pattyn & Marjolein Bouterse, 2020. "Explaining use and non-use of policy evaluations in a mature evaluation setting," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Feichtinger, Paul & Salhofer, Klaus, 2013. "What Do We Know about the Influence of Agricultural Support on Agricultural Land Prices?," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 62(2).
    21. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6b7kf1issd8leb93o27ofdm8cu is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Smits, Pernelle A. & Champagne, François & Farand, Lambert, 2012. "Beyond resistance: Exploring health managers’ propensity for participatory evaluation in a developing country," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 256-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.