IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v47y2014icp64-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitators and barriers to implementation of the AIDES initiative, a social innovation for participative assessment of children in need and for coordination of services

Author

Listed:
  • Dufour, Sarah
  • Lessard, Danielle
  • Chamberland, Claire

Abstract

As part of an implementation evaluation, this study aims to identify the conditions of practice that facilitated or hindered implementation of the AIDES initiative, a social innovation to support collaboration between partners involved with vulnerable children. Evaluators conducted qualitative telephone interviews with 36 respondents (19 practitioners and 17 managers) who participated in the AIDES initiative trial. Respondents were chosen to include all participating organisations (child protection services, prevention social services). Participants’ comments were submitted to descriptive content analysis. Conditions facilitating or hindering implementation of the initiative included the following dimensions: (1) implementation quality; (2) organisational elements (organisational functioning, cooperation between organisations); (3) socio-political issues; and (4) personal and professional characteristics. The study highlights critical elements to consider in implementing and maintaining significant changes in practice in organisations providing assistance to vulnerable children and their families. Social innovations that do not consider such elements are likely to compromise their implementation and sustainability. We must prevent promising social changes from being considered unrealistic or inappropriate due to contextual barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dufour, Sarah & Lessard, Danielle & Chamberland, Claire, 2014. "Facilitators and barriers to implementation of the AIDES initiative, a social innovation for participative assessment of children in need and for coordination of services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 64-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:47:y:2014:i:c:p:64-70
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000883
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, Penelope F., 2011. "Evidence-based practice in real-world services for young people with complex needs: New opportunities suggested by recent implementation science," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 207-216, February.
    2. Léveillé, Sophie & Chamberland, Claire, 2010. "Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation of international experiences regarding the adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Thei," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 929-944, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lasma Dobele, 2016. "A New Approach in Higher Education: Social Entrepreneurship Education," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2016),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    2. Quiroz-Saavedra, Rodrigo & Alfaro, Jaime & Rodríguez-Rivas, Matías E., 2023. "Perceptions of professionals about factors affecting the implementation of early childhood support systems: A case study evaluation from an ecological perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Szijarto, Barbara & Milley, Peter & Svensson, Kate & Cousins, J. Bradley, 2018. "On the evaluation of social innovations and social enterprises: Recognizing and integrating two solitudes in the empirical knowledge base," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 20-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Kwaadsteniet, Leontien & Bartelink, Cora & Witteman, Cilia & ten Berge, Ingrid & van Yperen, Tom, 2013. "Improved decision making about suspected child maltreatment: Results of structuring the decision process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 347-352.
    2. Lachance, Lisa & Watson, Crystal & Blais, Daniel & Ungar, Michael & Healey, Gwen & Salaffie, Moriah & Sundar, Purnima & Kelly, Laura & Lagace, Marie Claude, 2019. "Strengthening child and youth programs: A look at inter-organizational mentoring strategies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Paula Prendeville & Maria Bourke & William Kinsella, 2023. "Using an Implementation Science Framework to Evaluate an Ethical Education Curriculum: A Narrative Scoping Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Stroobants, Tim & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Andries, Caroline & Van Holen, Frank, 2016. "Youth care workers' perspectives on and adoption of evidence-based practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 299-307.
    5. Sanders, Jackie & Munford, Robyn & Boden, Joseph, 2017. "Culture and context: The differential impact of culture, risks and resources on resilience among vulnerable adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 517-526.
    6. Desautels, Julien & Touchette, Luc & Pauzé, Robert, 2020. "Intensive family intervention programs: Tailoring interventions to family clinical profiles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Axford, Nick & Morpeth, Louise, 2013. "Evidence-based programs in children's services: A critical appraisal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 268-277.
    8. Sanders, Jackie & Munford, Robyn, 2014. "Youth-centred practice: Positive youth development practices and pathways to better outcomes for vulnerable youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 160-167.
    9. Balsells Bailón, M. Àngels & Urrea-Monclús, Aida & Vaquero Tió, Eduard & Fernández-Rodrigo, Laura, 2022. "The voices of children, mothers, and fathers: Can parenting programs improve reunification processes in the Spanish child protection system?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Platt, Dendy & Riches, Katie, 2016. "Assessing parental capacity to change: The missing jigsaw piece in the assessment of a child's welfare?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-148.
    11. Rogers-Brown, Jessica S. & Self-Brown, Shannon & Romano, Elisa & Weeks, Erin & Thompson, William W. & Whitaker, Daniel J., 2020. "Behavior change across implementations of the SafeCare model in real world settings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Bontje, Marjanne C.A. & de Ronde, Ruben W. & Dubbeldeman, Eveline M. & Kamphuis, Mascha & Reis, Ria & Crone, Mathilde R., 2021. "Parental engagement in preventive youth health care: Effect evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Bérubé, Annie & Lafantaisie, Vicky & Clément, Marie-Ève & Coutu, Sylvain & Dubeau, Diane & Caron, Josée & Lacharité, Carl, 2017. "Caseworkers' perspective on risk factors in the family environment influencing mothers' difficulties in meeting children's needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 365-372.
    14. Alice Knight & Alys Havard & Anthony Shakeshaft & Myfanwy Maple & Mieke Snijder & Bernie Shakeshaft, 2017. "The Feasibility of Embedding Data Collection into the Routine Service Delivery of a Multi-Component Program for High-Risk Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Engell, Thomas & Løvstad, Anne Marte & Kirkøen, Benedicte & Ogden, Terje & Amlund Hagen, Kristine, 2021. "Exploring how intervention characteristics affect implementability: A mixed methods case study of common elements-based academic support in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Delawarde-Saïas, Cécile & Gagné, Marie-Hélène & Brunson, Liesette & Drapeau, Sylvie, 2018. "Implementing a multilevel prevention strategy under an intersectoral partnership: The case of the Triple P Program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 170-179.
    17. Ungar, Michael, 2011. "Community resilience for youth and families: Facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1742-1748, September.
    18. Walker, Janet S. & Baird, Caitlin, 2019. "Using “remote” training and coaching to increase providers' skills for working effectively with older youth and young adults with serious mental health conditions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 119-128.
    19. Horwath, Jan & Morrison, Tony, 2011. "Effective inter-agency collaboration to safeguard children: Rising to the challenge through collective development," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 368-375, February.
    20. Greeson, Johanna K.P. & Thompson, Allison E. & Ali, Samira & Wenger, Rebecca Stern, 2015. "It's good to know that you got somebody that's not going anywhere: Attitudes and beliefs of older youth in foster care about child welfare-based natural mentoring," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 140-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:47:y:2014:i:c:p:64-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.