IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i7p929-944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation of international experiences regarding the adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families (FACNF)

Author

Listed:
  • Léveillé, Sophie
  • Chamberland, Claire

Abstract

The United Kingdom has been at the forefront of an international movement to reform child welfare and protection systems both in terms of responding to children in difficulty and developing methods for organising such responses. More specifically, England and Wales have initiated a model of professional practice for vulnerable children and their families: the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. This analytical and intervention framework has since been adopted in fifteen countries. This article reveals the results of a meta-evaluation of research that examines the implementation experiences and results of the framework in order to identify common and specific empirical elements related to its effectiveness. A content analysis of 50 documents reveals, in particular, the desirability of having organisational arrangements that, at the local level, foster leadership, inter-organisational collaboration, professional training, implementation planning, ownership of the target model, allowance of time for implementation and ownership of the target model, the use of information technology and communication, and reflexion. Promoting these elements reduces their observed counterparts such as confusion, cognitive biases, and faulty and uneven knowledge among the local partners. The results also indicate that professionals who use the framework ultimately make better assessments of the complex situations they face, have a more holistic and child-centered point of view, and consequently plan better interventions. The model increases inter-professional and inter-organisational collaboration. It also increases the participation of children and parents in the provision of services intended for them, yet slightly below expectations. The meta-evaluation also reveals that few evaluative studies address the impact of the model on the welfare of children. Finally, this article underscores the urgent need for incorporating measurements of child development into practice and evaluative research.

Suggested Citation

  • Léveillé, Sophie & Chamberland, Claire, 2010. "Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation of international experiences regarding the adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Thei," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 929-944, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:7:p:929-944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(10)00073-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bontje, Marjanne C.A. & de Ronde, Ruben W. & Dubbeldeman, Eveline M. & Kamphuis, Mascha & Reis, Ria & Crone, Mathilde R., 2021. "Parental engagement in preventive youth health care: Effect evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Bérubé, Annie & Lafantaisie, Vicky & Clément, Marie-Ève & Coutu, Sylvain & Dubeau, Diane & Caron, Josée & Lacharité, Carl, 2017. "Caseworkers' perspective on risk factors in the family environment influencing mothers' difficulties in meeting children's needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 365-372.
    3. Platt, Dendy & Riches, Katie, 2016. "Assessing parental capacity to change: The missing jigsaw piece in the assessment of a child's welfare?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-148.
    4. de Kwaadsteniet, Leontien & Bartelink, Cora & Witteman, Cilia & ten Berge, Ingrid & van Yperen, Tom, 2013. "Improved decision making about suspected child maltreatment: Results of structuring the decision process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 347-352.
    5. Dufour, Sarah & Lessard, Danielle & Chamberland, Claire, 2014. "Facilitators and barriers to implementation of the AIDES initiative, a social innovation for participative assessment of children in need and for coordination of services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 64-70.
    6. Horwath, Jan & Morrison, Tony, 2011. "Effective inter-agency collaboration to safeguard children: Rising to the challenge through collective development," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 368-375, February.
    7. Balsells Bailón, M. Àngels & Urrea-Monclús, Aida & Vaquero Tió, Eduard & Fernández-Rodrigo, Laura, 2022. "The voices of children, mothers, and fathers: Can parenting programs improve reunification processes in the Spanish child protection system?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:7:p:929-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.