IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v106y2024ics0149718924000636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach

Author

Listed:
  • Doğan, Yunus
  • Yıldırım, Nazife Tuğba
  • Batdı, Veli

Abstract

The current study represents a comprehensive exploration of the efficacy of portfolio assessment within primary school contexts, employing a Multi-Complementary Research (McA) framework comprising three distinct stages. In the pre-complementary knowledge stage, data collection commenced utilizing the document analysis method, concurrently conducting meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis. From 18 studies, a meta-analysis of 23 datasets revealed a medium-level overall effect size. Simultaneously, meta-thematic analysis was conducted on 6 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, analyzing themes and codes through content analysis. Transitioning to the post-complementary knowledge stage, an experimental study employing a pretest-posttest control group design was undertaken with third-grade primary school students. Additionally, thematic analysis based on participant perspectives was conducted. Subsequently, an eventual complementary knowledge stage was achieved by synthesizing findings from the initial two stages. Key themes emerged, titled "the effect of portfolio use in primary education on academic success, 21st century skills, and attitudes." The collective findings indicate that portfolio assessment in primary schools yields positive effects across all three identified themes.

Suggested Citation

  • Doğan, Yunus & Yıldırım, Nazife Tuğba & Batdı, Veli, 2024. "Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000636
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.