IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v103y2024ics0149718924000119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using personal network analysis to understand the interaction between programmes’ facilitators and teachers in psychoeducational interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Jariego, Isidro
  • Muñoz Alvis, Andrés
  • Villar Onrubia, Daniel

Abstract

In this study we use personal network analysis to examine the social relationships taking place throughout programme implementation. Previous literature on psychosocial intervention has used network analysis techniques to examine: (a) the interaction between participants, (b) the facilitators' link to the intervention target group, (c) the transfer of knowledge between experts and facilitators, and (d) the interaction of facilitators with each other. However, there has been little research on how facilitators connect with other figures in their organisational context, impacting both intervention fidelity and the fit of the programme to the local context. In this study we combine the analysis of personal networks with qualitative interviews with 102 teachers in 72 schools in Barranquilla (Colombia), with whom we describe the implementation of the psychoeducational programmes Pisotón and Metodologías Flexibles. The results show that programme implementation networks not only rely on facilitators but also on the contribution of the schools’ director of studies, the coupling with the regular classroom teachers, and occasional collaborations from the rest of the school staff. After conducting a cluster analysis, we detected the existence of two types of personal networks, some based on the functioning of highly cohesive teams and others with a greater level of centralisation around the head of studies. Implementation networks not only enable the implementation of programme activities, but also the integration of the programme into educational organisations. In the discussion we reflect on how the analysis of facilitators' personal networks can be used to improve the process of programme implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Jariego, Isidro & Muñoz Alvis, Andrés & Villar Onrubia, Daniel, 2024. "Using personal network analysis to understand the interaction between programmes’ facilitators and teachers in psychoeducational interventions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quiroz-Saavedra, Rodrigo & Alfaro, Jaime & Rodríguez-Rivas, Matías E., 2023. "Perceptions of professionals about factors affecting the implementation of early childhood support systems: A case study evaluation from an ecological perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.
    3. Walker, Timothy J. & Szeszulski, Jacob & Robertson, Michael C. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Fernandez, Maria E., 2022. "Understanding implementation strategies to support classroom-based physical activity approaches in elementary schools: A qualitative study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Isidro Maya-Jariego & Andrés Muñoz-Alvis & Jean David Polo-Vargas & Jorge E. Palacio-Sañudo & Alberto M. Castro-Correa, 2022. "Organisational factors in the implementation of educational modules at schools in Barranquilla (Colombia)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Woodland, Rebecca H. & Douglas, Jacole & Matuszczak, Densie, 2021. "Assessing organizational capacity for diffusion: A school-based social network analysis case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Ma, Xin & Shen, Jianping & Reeves, Patricia, 2023. "Measuring integrity and fidelity of program implementation: Validating an instrument designed for school renewal," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Dayong & Men, Hao & Zhang, Zhaoxin, 2024. "Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    2. Ken-Opurum, Jennifer & Lynch, Krystal & Vandergraff, Donna & Miller, Douglas K. & Savaiano, Dennis A., 2019. "A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Provan, Keith G. & Leischow, Scott J. & Keagy, Judith & Nodora, Jesse, 2010. "Research collaboration in the discovery, development, and delivery networks of a statewide cancer coalition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 349-355, November.
    4. Calvin Weng & Tugrul Daim, 2012. "Structural Differentiation and Its Implications—Core/Periphery Structure of the Technological Network," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(4), pages 327-342, December.
    5. Rocco Palumbo & Mohammad Fakhar Manesh & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Giulia Flamini, 2020. "Exploiting Inter-Organizational Relationships in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Patterson, Megan S. & Prochnow, Tyler & Richardson, Ryan G. & Jackson, Kevin P., 2020. "Using network analysis to conduct a system-wide program evaluation within a university," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & McBeath, Bowen & Chuang, Emmeline & Pérez-Jolles, Monica & Wells, Rebecca, 2014. "Collaboration, competition, and co-opetition: Interorganizational dynamics between private child welfare agencies and child serving sectors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 113-122.
    8. McLinden, Daniel, 2013. "Concept maps as network data: Analysis of a concept map using the methods of social network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 40-48.
    9. Bustos, Tatiana E., 2020. "A scoping review of social network analyses in interorganizational collaboration studies for child mental health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Ducharme, Lori J. & Fujimoto, Kayo & Kuo, Jacky & Stewart, Jonathan & Taylor, Bruce & Schneider, John, 2024. "Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.