IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v102y2024ics0149718923001520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ducharme, Lori J.
  • Fujimoto, Kayo
  • Kuo, Jacky
  • Stewart, Jonathan
  • Taylor, Bruce
  • Schneider, John

Abstract

Research networks encourage team science and facilitate collaboration within and across research teams. While many analyses have examined the output of these collaborative networks (e.g., authorship networks, publications, grant applications), less attention has been paid to the formative phases of these initiatives. This article presents analyses of a whole-network survey of investigators participating in a new research initiative, and examines the development of collaborative ties over the network’s first year. In particular, we examine the influence of research center affiliation, seniority, and prior network experience on the number and structure of collaborative ties, including participants’ bridging and broker roles. Such analyses can inform the overall management of the project in purposefully promoting new collaboration opportunities, and may ultimately predict the number of collaborative products generated by the network members.

Suggested Citation

  • Ducharme, Lori J. & Fujimoto, Kayo & Kuo, Jacky & Stewart, Jonathan & Taylor, Bruce & Schneider, John, 2024. "Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:102:y:2024:i:c:s0149718923001520
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923001520
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amar Dhand & Douglas A Luke & Bobbi J Carothers & Bradley A Evanoff, 2016. "Academic Cross-Pollination: The Role of Disciplinary Affiliation in Research Collaboration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Woodland, Rebecca H. & Douglas, Jacole & Matuszczak, Densie, 2021. "Assessing organizational capacity for diffusion: A school-based social network analysis case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Jodi E. Basner & Katrina I. Theisz & Unni S. Jensen & C. David Jones & Ilya Ponomarev & Pawel Sulima & Karen Jo & Mariam Eljanne & Michael G. Espey & Jonathan Franca-Koh & Sean E. Hanlon & Nastaran Z., 2013. "Measuring the evolution and output of cross-disciplinary collaborations within the NCI Physical Sciences--Oncology Centers Network," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 285-297, October.
    4. Hoff P.D. & Raftery A.E. & Handcock M.S., 2002. "Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1090-1098, December.
    5. Matthew Claudel & Emanuele Massaro & Paolo Santi & Fiona Murray & Carlo Ratti, 2017. "An exploration of collaborative scientific production at MIT through spatial organization and institutional affiliation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weijun Hu & Mingxing Li & Xiaomeng Chi & Xinxing Wang & Asad Ullah Khan, 2024. "Intangible cultural heritage research in China from the perspective of intellectual property rights based on bibliometrics and knowledge mapping," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laleh Tafakori & Armin Pourkhanali & Riccardo Rastelli, 2022. "Measuring systemic risk and contagion in the European financial network," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 345-389, July.
    2. Mark S. Handcock & Adrian E. Raftery & Jeremy M. Tantrum, 2007. "Model‐based clustering for social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 301-354, March.
    3. Ian E. Fellows & Mark S. Handcock, 2023. "Modeling of networked populations when data is sampled or missing," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(1), pages 21-35, April.
    4. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    5. Hackett, Edward J. & Leahey, Erin & Parker, John N. & Rafols, Ismael & Hampton, Stephanie E. & Corte, Ugo & Chavarro, Diego & Drake, John M. & Penders, Bart & Sheble, Laura & Vermeulen, Niki & Vision,, 2021. "Do synthesis centers synthesize? A semantic analysis of topical diversity in research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    6. Guang Ouyang & Dipak K. Dey & Panpan Zhang, 2020. "Clique-Based Method for Social Network Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(1), pages 254-274, April.
    7. Thanne Mafaziya Nijamdeen & Jean Huge & Hajaniaina Ratsimbazafy & Kodikara Arachchilage Sunanda Kodikara & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2022. "A social network analysis of mangrove management stakeholders in Sri Lanka's Northern Province," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/349602, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Yuan, Quan & Liu, Binghui, 2021. "Community detection via an efficient nonconvex optimization approach based on modularity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Samrachana Adhikari & Tracy Sweet & Brian Junker, 2021. "Analysis of longitudinal advice‐seeking networks following implementation of high stakes testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(4), pages 1475-1500, October.
    10. Chung, Jaewon & Bridgeford, Eric & Arroyo, Jesus & Pedigo, Benjamin D. & Saad-Eldin, Ali & Gopalakrishnan, Vivek & Xiang, Liang & Priebe, Carey E. & Vogelstein, Joshua T., 2020. "Statistical Connectomics," OSF Preprints ek4n3, Center for Open Science.
    11. Falk Bräuning & Siem Jan Koopman, 2016. "The dynamic factor network model with an application to global credit risk," Working Papers 16-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    12. Jamie Olson & Kathleen Carley, 2013. "Exact and approximate EM estimation of mutually exciting hawkes processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 63-80, April.
    13. Chih‐Sheng Hsieh & Lung‐Fei Lee & Vincent Boucher, 2020. "Specification and estimation of network formation and network interaction models with the exponential probability distribution," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1349-1390, November.
    14. Behrens, Kristian & Kichko, Sergei & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2024. "Working from home: Too much of a good thing?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. West, Robert M. & House, Allan O. & Keen, Justin & Ward, Vicky L., 2015. "Using the structure of social networks to map inter-agency relationships in public health services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 107-114.
    16. Chiara Di Maria & Antonino Abbruzzo & Gianfranco Lovison, 2022. "Networks as mediating variables: a Bayesian latent space approach," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 1015-1035, October.
    17. Xiao-Li Meng, 2016. "Discussion: Should a Working Model Actually Work?," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 362-367, December.
    18. Áureo de Paula, 2015. "Econometrics of network models," CeMMAP working papers CWP52/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. Chen, Mingli & Fernández-Val, Iván & Weidner, Martin, 2021. "Nonlinear factor models for network and panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 296-324.
    20. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:102:y:2024:i:c:s0149718923001520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.