IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v88y2015icp244-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A semi-analytical non-iterative primary approach based on priority list to solve unit commitment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Moradi, Saeed
  • Khanmohammadi, Sohrab
  • Hagh, Mehrdad Tarafdar
  • Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam

Abstract

For many years, the UC (unit commitment) problem has been solved by complex numerical techniques or intelligent search algorithms, due to nonlinear and complex constraints. Many of the applied algorithms employ random searches, which leads to production of different solutions in different program runs. Priority list-based methods are a way out to this, as they produce robust results during a non-iterative procedure, and without help of trial and error efforts. Nevertheless, they have all proven inefficient. This paper introduces a new approach that generates the solutions using algorithm-specific constraint handling techniques, based on the priority list concept. The solution-making stages include: 1. Minimum up/down time establishment using a probabilistic priority list-oriented selection mechanism, 2. Spinning reserve constraint handling through a deterministic priority list-based process, 3. Power balance handling and a ramp rate modification procedure for generating efficient ramp-constrained solutions. The different steps are designed such that efficient modifications are applied in each step without violating the previously established constraints. Simulation results on different test systems reveal that the approach obtains robust and competitive results. A new 140-unit large-scale test system based on Korean power system is also presented for verifying applicability of the proposed approach on real world power systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Moradi, Saeed & Khanmohammadi, Sohrab & Hagh, Mehrdad Tarafdar & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam, 2015. "A semi-analytical non-iterative primary approach based on priority list to solve unit commitment problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 244-259.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:88:y:2015:i:c:p:244-259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215005885
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niknam, Taher & Khodaei, Amin & Fallahi, Farhad, 2009. "A new decomposition approach for the thermal unit commitment problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1667-1674, September.
    2. Kim, Jong Suk & Edgar, Thomas F., 2014. "Optimal scheduling of combined heat and power plants using mixed-integer nonlinear programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 675-690.
    3. Ji, Bin & Yuan, Xiaohui & Chen, Zhihuan & Tian, Hao, 2014. "Improved gravitational search algorithm for unit commitment considering uncertainty of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 52-62.
    4. Wang, Yongqiang & Zhou, Jianzhong & Mo, Li & Zhang, Rui & Zhang, Yongchuan, 2012. "Short-term hydrothermal generation scheduling using differential real-coded quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 657-671.
    5. Khanmohammadi, S. & Amiri, M. & Haque, M. Tarafdar, 2010. "A new three-stage method for solving unit commitment problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3072-3080.
    6. Madzharov, D. & Delarue, E. & D'haeseleer, W., 2014. "Integrating electric vehicles as flexible load in unit commitment modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 285-294.
    7. Nazari, M.E. & Ardehali, M.M. & Jafari, S., 2010. "Pumped-storage unit commitment with considerations for energy demand, economics, and environmental constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4092-4101.
    8. Yazdani Damavandi, Maziar & Kiaei, Iman & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohamad Kazem & Seifi, Hossein, 2011. "New approach to gas network modeling in unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6243-6250.
    9. Pousinho, H.M.I. & Silva, H. & Mendes, V.M.F. & Collares-Pereira, M. & Pereira Cabrita, C., 2014. "Self-scheduling for energy and spinning reserve of wind/CSP plants by a MILP approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 524-534.
    10. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Carraretto, Cristian, 2006. "Optimum production plans for thermal power plants in the deregulated electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1567-1585.
    11. Yang, Yuanchao & Wang, Jianhui & Guan, Xiaohong & Zhai, Qiaozhu, 2012. "Subhourly unit commitment with feasible energy delivery constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 245-252.
    12. Falsafi, Hananeh & Zakariazadeh, Alireza & Jadid, Shahram, 2014. "The role of demand response in single and multi-objective wind-thermal generation scheduling: A stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 853-867.
    13. Min, C.G. & Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Yoon, Y.T., 2013. "Game-theory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 310-318.
    14. Catalão, J.P.S. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Contreras, J., 2012. "Optimal hydro scheduling and offering strategies considering price uncertainty and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 237-244.
    15. Hong, Ying-Yi & Lin, Jie-Kai, 2013. "Interactive multi-objective active power scheduling considering uncertain renewable energies using adaptive chaos clonal evolutionary programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 212-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Guanghui & Yang, Weixin, 2019. "Study on optimization of economic dispatching of electric power system based on Hybrid Intelligent Algorithms (PSO and AFSA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-935.
    2. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    3. Venter, Philip van Zyl & Terblanche, Stephanus Esias & van Eldik, Martin, 2018. "Turbine investment optimisation for energy recovery plants by utilising historic steam flow profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 668-677.
    4. Alexia Marchand & Michel Gendreau & Marko Blais & Jonathan Guidi, 2019. "Optimized operating rules for short-term hydropower planning in a stochastic environment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-519, July.
    5. Yang, Linfeng & Li, Wei & Xu, Yan & Zhang, Cuo & Chen, Shifei, 2021. "Two novel locally ideal three-period unit commitment formulations in power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Biéron, M. & Le Dréau, J. & Haas, B., 2023. "Assessment of the marginal technologies reacting to demand response events: A French case-study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Ali, E.S. & Elazim, S.M. Abd & Balobaid, A.S., 2023. "Implementation of coyote optimization algorithm for solving unit commitment problem in power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glotić, Arnel & Glotić, Adnan & Kitak, Peter & Pihler, Jože & Tičar, Igor, 2014. "Optimization of hydro energy storage plants by using differential evolution algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-107.
    2. Shukla, Anup & Singh, S.N., 2016. "Advanced three-stage pseudo-inspired weight-improved crazy particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 23-36.
    3. Bai, Yang & Zhong, Haiwang & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Xie, Le, 2015. "A decomposition method for network-constrained unit commitment with AC power flow constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 595-603.
    4. Santhosh, Apoorva & Farid, Amro M. & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2014. "The impact of storage facility capacity and ramping capabilities on the supply side economic dispatch of the energy–water nexus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 363-377.
    5. Hickman, William & Muzhikyan, Aramazd & Farid, Amro M., 2017. "The synergistic role of renewable energy integration into the unit commitment of the energy water nexus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 220-229.
    6. Ji, Bin & Yuan, Xiaohui & Chen, Zhihuan & Tian, Hao, 2014. "Improved gravitational search algorithm for unit commitment considering uncertainty of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 52-62.
    7. Pérez-Díaz, Juan I. & Jiménez, Javier, 2016. "Contribution of a pumped-storage hydropower plant to reduce the scheduling costs of an isolated power system with high wind power penetration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 92-104.
    8. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2015. "Optimal dynamic allocation of mobile plants to monetize associated or stranded natural gas, part I: Bakken shale play case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1581-1594.
    9. Schulze, Tim & McKinnon, Ken, 2016. "The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 592-605.
    10. Glotić, Arnel & Zamuda, Aleš, 2015. "Short-term combined economic and emission hydrothermal optimization by surrogate differential evolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 42-56.
    11. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    12. Vasilios A. Tsalavoutis & Constantinos G. Vrionis & Athanasios I. Tolis, 2021. "Optimizing a unit commitment problem using an evolutionary algorithm and a plurality of priority lists," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-54, March.
    13. Sousa, Tiago & Morais, Hugo & Vale, Zita & Castro, Rui, 2015. "A multi-objective optimization of the active and reactive resource scheduling at a distribution level in a smart grid context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 236-250.
    14. Shen, Jianjian & Cheng, Chuntian & Cheng, Xiong & Lund, Jay R., 2016. "Coordinated operations of large-scale UHVDC hydropower and conventional hydro energies about regional power grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 433-446.
    15. Massrur, Hamid Reza & Niknam, Taher & Aghaei, Jamshid & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A stochastic mid-term scheduling for integrated wind-thermal systems using self-adaptive optimization approach: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 552-564.
    16. Moradi-Dalvand, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Amjady, N. & Zareipour, H. & Mazhab-Jafari, A., 2015. "Self-scheduling of a wind producer based on Information Gap Decision Theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 588-600.
    17. Wang, Yongqiang & Zhou, Jianzhong & Mo, Li & Zhang, Rui & Zhang, Yongchuan, 2012. "Short-term hydrothermal generation scheduling using differential real-coded quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 657-671.
    18. Soroudi, Alireza, 2013. "Robust optimization based self scheduling of hydro-thermal Genco in smart grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 262-271.
    19. Li, Y.Z. & Wu, Q.H. & Li, M.S. & Zhan, J.P., 2014. "Mean-variance model for power system economic dispatch with wind power integrated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-520.
    20. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Ji, Changming & Qin, Hui & Feng, Zhongkai, 2018. "Multi-stage progressive optimality algorithm and its application in energy storage operation chart optimization of cascade reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 309-323.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:88:y:2015:i:c:p:244-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.