IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v33y2008i2p321-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic estimates for a novel zero-emission process generating hydrogen and electric power

Author

Listed:
  • Tsatsaronis, George
  • Kapanke, Kerstin
  • María Blanco Marigorta, Ana

Abstract

This paper presents the exergoeconomic analysis of a novel process generating electric energy and hydrogen. Coal and high-temperature heat are used as input energy to the process. The process is a true “zero-emission process” because (a) no NOX is formed during coal combustion with sulfuric acid, and (b) the combustion products CO2 and SO2 are removed separately as compressed liquids from the overall process. The process cycle is based on two chemical reactions. The first reaction takes place in an electrolytic cell and delivers the hydrogen product. In the second step, coal reacts with sulfuric acid in a high-pressure combustion reactor. The combustion gas is expanded in a gas turbine to produce electric power. The combustion products are compressed and separated so that almost pure CO2 can be removed from the cycle. The overall process is characterized by very high energetic and exergetic efficiencies. However, the overall process is very capital intensive. The electrolytic cell dominates the costs associated with the overall process. Detailed results of the thermodynamic simulation, the economic and the exergoeconomic analyses of the process including estimates of the product costs are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsatsaronis, George & Kapanke, Kerstin & María Blanco Marigorta, Ana, 2008. "Exergoeconomic estimates for a novel zero-emission process generating hydrogen and electric power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 321-330.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:321-330
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544207001880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    2. Norouzi, Maryam & Yeganeh, Mansour & Yusaf, Talal, 2021. "Landscape framework for the exploitation of renewable energy resources and potentials in urban scale (case study: Iran)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 300-319.
    3. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2013. "Performance of power generation extension system based on solid-oxide electrolyzer cells under various design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 647-657.
    4. de Souza, Sergio Alencar & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz, 2014. "Thermoeconomic and ecological analysis applied to heating industrial process in chemical reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 96-107.
    5. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    6. Nasruddin, & Idrus Alhamid, M. & Daud, Yunus & Surachman, Arief & Sugiyono, Agus & Aditya, H.B. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2016. "Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 733-740.
    7. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Yue, Ting & Lior, Noam, 2017. "Exergo-economic competitiveness criteria for hybrid power cycles using multiple heat sources of different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 943-961.
    10. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    11. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    12. Yilmaz, Fatih & Selbaş, Reşat, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar based Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 520-529.
    13. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Younesi, Habibollah & Najafpour, Ghasem, 2016. "On the exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system–non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 507-520.
    14. Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Koch, Daniela & Sorgenfrei, Max, 2013. "Understanding the thermodynamic inefficiencies in combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 3-11.
    15. Wei, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Bingjian & Wu, Shengyuan & Chen, Qinglin & Tsatsaronis, George, 2012. "Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 424-433.
    16. Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz, 2013. "Fuzzy thermoeconomic optimisation applied to a small waste water treatment plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 214-219.
    17. Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Silveira, Jose Luz & Oscare Giacaglia, Giorgio Eugenio & Mattos dos Reis, Luiz Octavio, 2010. "Thermoeconomic analysis applied to an alternative wastewater treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2288-2296.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olusegun David Samuel & Peter A. Aigba & Thien Khanh Tran & H. Fayaz & Carlo Pastore & Oguzhan Der & Ali Erçetin & Christopher C. Enweremadu & Ahmad Mustafa, 2023. "Comparison of the Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Mechanical Stirring Reactors for the Production of Sustainable Hevea brasiliensis Ethyl Ester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    4. Roque Díaz, P. & Benito, Y.R. & Parise, J.A.R., 2010. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a multi-engine, multi-heat-pump CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power generation) system – A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3540-3550.
    5. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    6. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Sadi, M. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solar-waste driven power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 883-893.
    8. Garousi Farshi, L. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2013. "Exergoeconomic comparison of double effect and combined ejector-double effect absorption refrigeration systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 700-711.
    9. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Carassai, Anna, 2012. "Conventional and advanced exergetic analyses applied to a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 146-152.
    10. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    11. Yue, Ting & Lior, Noam, 2017. "Exergo economic analysis of solar-assisted hybrid power generation systems integrated with thermochemical fuel conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 204-222.
    12. Primabudi, Eko & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant (C3MR) LNG process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 492-504.
    13. Uysal, Cuneyt & Keçebaş, Ali, 2021. "Advanced exergoeconomic analysis with using modified productive structure analysis: An application for a real gas turbine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Yeqiang Zhang & Biao Lei & Zubair Masaud & Muhammad Imran & Yuting Wu & Jinping Liu & Xiaoding Qin & Hafiz Ali Muhammad, 2020. "Waste Heat Recovery from Diesel Engine Exhaust Using a Single-Screw Expander Organic Rankine Cycle System: Experimental Investigation of Exergy Destruction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    16. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Amidpour, M., 2012. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 271-283.
    17. Coban, Kahraman & Şöhret, Yasin & Colpan, C. Ozgur & Karakoç, T. Hikmet, 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a small-scale turbojet fuelled with biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1358-1367.
    18. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2021. "Exergo-economic analysis of off-design a target drone engine for reconnaissance mission flight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:321-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.