IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v305y2024ics0360544224021753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multifaceted multi-criteria decision making framework to prioritise the electric two-wheelers based on standard and regional driving cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Gurusamy, Azhaganathan
  • Ashok, Bragadeshwaran
  • Alsaif, Faisal
  • Suresh, Vishnu

Abstract

The primary objective of the carried-out research work is to utilise the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques to rank the top-selling electric two-wheeler (E2W) models based on the different performance features stated by original equipment manufacturers and estimated through standard and regional driving cycle (DC) analysis. First and foremost, the vehicle structural, powertrain, performance features, and cost component-related data of eight top-selling E2W models (M1–M8) are gathered from the official websites of OEMs and local dealers. Then, performance features like energy consumption per km (EC/km), driving range (DR), well-to-wheel (WTW) CO2 emission, total cost of ownership (TCO), and total cost of ownership per km (TCO/km) are estimated under standard and regional DCs through the developed energy consumption and TCO models. Further, the ten different MCDM tools are utilised for prioritising the E2W models under each DC with the attributes’ weights estimated from the entropy methods. To enhance the trustworthiness of ranking results, sensitivity analysis is done using six distinct combinations of attribute weights. Moreover, the M7 E2W is identified as the best E2W by utilising Borda Count to integrate all the ranking results. Overall, this study provides an in-depth understanding for users about how to select E2W with minimal effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurusamy, Azhaganathan & Ashok, Bragadeshwaran & Alsaif, Faisal & Suresh, Vishnu, 2024. "Multifaceted multi-criteria decision making framework to prioritise the electric two-wheelers based on standard and regional driving cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:305:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224021753
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224021753
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:305:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224021753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.