IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v299y2024ics0360544224010934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance and cost potential for direct-fired supercritical CO2 natural gas power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Pidaparti, Sandeep R.
  • White, Charles W.
  • Liese, Eric
  • Weiland, Nathan T.

Abstract

Direct-fired supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles are being explored as an attractive alternative to natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Therefore, understanding their performance and cost potential is important for the commercialization of the technology. This study presents detailed techno-economic optimization results of natural gas-fired, utility-scale power plants based on the direct sCO2 power cycle, which is lacking in public literature. The study considered multiple plant configurations with varying levels of thermal integration with the plant air separation unit (ASU) to shows the systematic impact of thermal integration on plant performance and economics. Several design variables for each power cycle configuration were identified and optimized to minimize the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The optimized direct sCO2 power plants achieved ∼48 % plant efficiency (HHV basis) which is similar or slightly higher plant efficiencies than state-of-the-art NGCC plants based on the F-class gas turbine with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The LCOE of the optimized direct sCO2 plants is 13–17 % higher than the reference NGCC plants with CCS due to high capital costs associated with the ASU and sCO2 power block, though there is significant room for improvement due to high uncertainty in component capital costs for these new plants. Based on the results, direct sCO2 power cycles have the potential to achieve >50 % efficiency (HHV basis) with >98 % CO2 capture rate which can lead to significant efficiency improvement and CO2 emissions reductions compared to NGCC plants with CCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Pidaparti, Sandeep R. & White, Charles W. & Liese, Eric & Weiland, Nathan T., 2024. "Performance and cost potential for direct-fired supercritical CO2 natural gas power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224010934
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224010934
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Gatti, Manuele & Martelli, Emanuele, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 505-526.
    2. Jiang, Yuan & Liese, Eric & Zitney, Stephen E. & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2018. "Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1019-1032.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    2. Martelli, Emanuele & Freschini, Marco & Zatti, Matteo, 2020. "Optimization of renewable energy subsidy and carbon tax for multi energy systems using bilevel programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    3. Mohammadpour, Mohammadreza & Houshfar, Ehsan & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Mohammadpour, Amirreza, 2021. "Energy and exergy analysis of biogas fired regenerative gas turbine cycle with CO2 recirculation for oxy-fuel combustion power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Daniele Candelaresi & Giuseppe Spazzafumo, 2023. "Production of Substitute Natural Gas Integrated with Allam Cycle for Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Fu, Yidan & Cai, Lei & Qi, Chenyu & Zhai, Jiangfeng, 2024. "Thermodynamic and economic analyses of the biomass gasification Allam cycle integrated with compressed carbon energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    6. Habib, Mohamed A. & Imteyaz, Binash & Nemitallah, Medhat A., 2020. "Second law analysis of premixed and non-premixed oxy-fuel combustion cycles utilizing oxygen separation membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    8. Xin, Tuantuan & Xu, Cheng & Yang, Yongping & Kindra, Vladimir & Rogalev, Andrey, 2023. "A new process splitting analytical method for the coal-based Allam cycle: Thermodynamic assessment and process integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    9. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Hang, 2024. "Thermal energy storage capacity configuration and energy distribution scheme for a 1000MWe S–CO2 coal-fired power plant to realize high-efficiency full-load adjustability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    10. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    11. Deng, Tianrui & Li, Xionghui & Wang, Qiuwang & Ma, Ting, 2019. "Dynamic modelling and transient characteristics of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 292-302.
    12. Yao, Lichao & Zou, Zhengping, 2020. "A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    14. Zhao, Yongming & Zhao, Lifeng & Wang, Bo & Zhang, Shijie & Chi, Jinling & Xiao, Yunhan, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel dual expansion coal-fueled direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 480-495.
    15. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    16. Zhao, Tian & Li, Hang & Li, Xia & Sun, Qing-Han & Fang, Xuan-Yi & Ma, Huan & Chen, Qun, 2024. "A frequency domain dynamic simulation method for heat exchangers and thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    17. Luo, Jing & Emelogu, Ogechi & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2021. "Exergy-based investigation of a coal-fired allam cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    18. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Tavano, Michele & Invernizzi, Costante Mario & Martelli, Emanuele, 2018. "Comparison of working fluids and cycle optimization for heat recovery ORCs from large internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 396-416.
    19. Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Recent developments and trends in optimization of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1011-1020.
    20. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224010934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.