IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v278y2023ipas0360544223011817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the performance of different wind speed distribution models applied to onshore and offshore wind speed data in the Northeast Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Lins, Davi Ribeiro
  • Guedes, Kevin Santos
  • Pitombeira-Neto, Anselmo Ramalho
  • Rocha, Paulo Alexandre Costa
  • de Andrade, Carla Freitas

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance presented by different distribution models when applied to onshore and offshore wind speed data and determine which distribution has the best fit in each location. The onshore data were measured at two stations located in the Northeast Brazil and the offshore data were measured by two ocean buoys located in the South Atlantic. Five probability distributions were used to model wind speed, namely: Weibull, Nakagami, extended generalized Lindley, generalized gamma and generalized extreme value. The probability distribution parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood, modified maximum likelihood and the method of multi-objective moments. In addition, three goodness of fit tests were used to select the distribution model that best fits a region’s wind speed data, namely: Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Deviation of Skewness and Kurtosis and the Akaike Information Criterion. The results of these tests were aggregated into a single performance metric called “total error”. In both onshore locations, the extended generalized Lindley and generalized gamma were, in general, superior to the other distributions. In the offshore wind data from the ocean buoys, the extended generalized Lindley, generalized gamma and Weibull showed the best fit in adjusting the histogram. The generalized extreme value distribution presented the worst fit for all four locations. According to the results, there is no single distribution model that is more appropriate to fit a set of wind speed data, and it is necessary to carry out a study to know which of the available distributions is the most appropriate for any particular dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Lins, Davi Ribeiro & Guedes, Kevin Santos & Pitombeira-Neto, Anselmo Ramalho & Rocha, Paulo Alexandre Costa & de Andrade, Carla Freitas, 2023. "Comparison of the performance of different wind speed distribution models applied to onshore and offshore wind speed data in the Northeast Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223011817
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223011817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladenburg, Jacob, 2009. "Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 380-387, March.
    2. de Assis Tavares, Luiz Filipe & Shadman, Milad & de Freitas Assad, Luiz Paulo & Silva, Corbiniano & Landau, Luiz & Estefen, Segen F., 2020. "Assessment of the offshore wind technical potential for the Brazilian Southeast and South regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Han, Qinkai & Ma, Sai & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2019. "Kernel density estimation model for wind speed probability distribution with applicability to wind energy assessment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Guedes, Kevin S. & de Andrade, Carla F. & Rocha, Paulo A.C. & Mangueira, Rivanilso dos S. & de Moura, Elineudo P., 2020. "Performance analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in estimating the parameters of several wind speed distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Li, Jiale & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2018. "Onshore and offshore wind energy potential assessment near Lake Erie shoreline: A spatial and temporal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1092-1107.
    6. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.
    7. Jianxing Yu & Yiqin Fu & Yang Yu & Shibo Wu & Yuanda Wu & Minjie You & Shuai Guo & Mu Li, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Bohai Bay, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    9. Jiang, Haiyan & Wang, Jianzhou & Wu, Jie & Geng, Wei, 2017. "Comparison of numerical methods and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for estimating parameters for wind energy potential assessment in low wind regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1199-1217.
    10. Kantar, Yeliz Mert & Usta, Ilhan & Arik, Ibrahim & Yenilmez, Ismail, 2018. "Wind speed analysis using the Extended Generalized Lindley Distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1024-1030.
    11. Liponi, Angelica & Frate, Guido Francesco & Baccioli, Andrea & Ferrari, Lorenzo & Desideri, Umberto, 2022. "Impact of wind speed distribution and management strategy on hydrogen production from wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Katikas, Loukas & Dimitriadis, Panayiotis & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris & Kontos, Themistoklis & Kyriakidis, Phaedon, 2021. "A stochastic simulation scheme for the long-term persistence, heavy-tailed and double periodic behavior of observational and reanalysis wind time-series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    13. Dokur, Emrah & Erdogan, Nuh & Salari, Mahdi Ebrahimi & Karakuzu, Cihan & Murphy, Jimmy, 2022. "Offshore wind speed short-term forecasting based on a hybrid method: Swarm decomposition and meta-extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    14. Gugliani, G.K. & Sarkar, A. & Ley, C. & Mandal, S., 2018. "New methods to assess wind resources in terms of wind speed, load, power and direction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 168-182.
    15. Sward, J.A. & Ault, T.R. & Zhang, K.M., 2023. "Spatial biases revealed by LiDAR in a multiphysics WRF ensemble designed for offshore wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    16. Kim, Gyeongmin & Hur, Jin, 2021. "Probabilistic modeling of wind energy potential for power grid expansion planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. He, Junyi & Chan, P.W. & Li, Qiusheng & Lee, C.W., 2020. "Spatiotemporal analysis of offshore wind field characteristics and energy potential in Hong Kong," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Bilgili, Mehmet & Yasar, Abdulkadir & Simsek, Erdogan, 2011. "Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 905-915, February.
    19. Soukissian, Takvor, 2013. "Use of multi-parameter distributions for offshore wind speed modeling: The Johnson SB distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 982-1000.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Shengmao & Wang, Shu & Xu, Xuefang & Li, Ruixiong & Shi, Peiming, 2024. "GAOformer: An adaptive spatiotemporal feature fusion transformer utilizing GAT and optimizable graph matrixes for offshore wind speed prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Zhang, Zeyu & Liang, Yushi & Xue, Xinyue & Li, Yan & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & Ji, Xiaodong, 2024. "China's future wind energy considering air density during climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Yuzgec, Ugur & Dokur, Emrah & Balci, Mehmet, 2024. "A novel hybrid model based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Echo State Network for wind power forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Guedes, Kevin S. & de Andrade, Carla F. & Rocha, Paulo A.C. & Mangueira, Rivanilso dos S. & de Moura, Elineudo P., 2020. "Performance analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in estimating the parameters of several wind speed distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2019. "Wind speed distribution selection – A review of recent development and progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Han, Qinkai & Ma, Sai & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2019. "Kernel density estimation model for wind speed probability distribution with applicability to wind energy assessment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Valliyil Mohammed Aboobacker & Puthuveetil Razak Shanas & Subramanian Veerasingam & Ebrahim M. A. S. Al-Ansari & Fadhil N. Sadooni & Ponnumony Vethamony, 2021. "Long-Term Assessment of Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potentials of Qatar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Kim, Ji-Young & Oh, Ki-Yong & Kim, Min-Suek & Kim, Kwang-Yul, 2019. "Evaluation and characterization of offshore wind resources with long-term met mast data corrected by wind lidar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 41-55.
    7. Chen, Xinping & Foley, Aoife & Zhang, Zenghai & Wang, Kaimin & O'Driscoll, Kieran, 2020. "An assessment of wind energy potential in the Beibu Gulf considering the energy demands of the Beibu Gulf Economic Rim," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. C, O. Mauricio Hernandez & Shadman, Milad & Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Silva, Corbiniano & Estefen, Segen F. & La Rovere, Emilio, 2021. "Environmental impacts of offshore wind installation, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning activities: A case study of Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Juseung Choi & Hoyong Eom & Seung-Mook Baek, 2022. "A Wind Power Probabilistic Model Using the Reflection Method and Multi-Kernel Function Kernel Density Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Katikas, Loukas & Dimitriadis, Panayiotis & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris & Kontos, Themistoklis & Kyriakidis, Phaedon, 2021. "A stochastic simulation scheme for the long-term persistence, heavy-tailed and double periodic behavior of observational and reanalysis wind time-series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    11. Akpan, Anthony E. & Ben, Ubong C. & Ekwok, Stephen E. & Okolie, Chukwuma J. & Epuh, Emeka E. & Julzarika, Atriyon & Othman, Abdullah & Eldosouky, Ahmed M., 2024. "Technical and performance assessments of wind turbines in low wind speed areas using numerical, metaheuristic and remote sensing procedures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    12. Ladenburg, Jacob & Lutzeyer, Sanja, 2012. "The economics of visual disamenity reductions of offshore wind farms—Review and suggestions from an emerging field," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6793-6802.
    13. Ladenburg, Jacob & Möller, Bernd, 2011. "Attitude and acceptance of offshore wind farms—The influence of travel time and wind farm attributes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4223-4235.
    14. Wang, Jianzhou & Huang, Xiaojia & Li, Qiwei & Ma, Xuejiao, 2018. "Comparison of seven methods for determining the optimal statistical distribution parameters: A case study of wind energy assessment in the large-scale wind farms of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 432-448.
    15. Hwangbo, Soonho & Heo, SungKu & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Development of deterministic-stochastic model to integrate variable renewable energy-driven electricity and large-scale utility networks: Towards decarbonization petrochemical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    16. Bagci, Kubra & Arslan, Talha & Celik, H. Eray, 2021. "Inverted Kumarswamy distribution for modeling the wind speed data: Lake Van, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Monica Borunda & Adrián Ramírez & Raul Garduno & Carlos García-Beltrán & Rito Mijarez, 2023. "Enhancing Long-Term Wind Power Forecasting by Using an Intelligent Statistical Treatment for Wind Resource Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-34, December.
    18. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Lee, C.W., 2022. "Characterizing coastal wind energy resources based on sodar and microwave radiometer observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat & Ahmad M. A. Malkawi & Ashraf Radaideh & Hussein M. K. Al-Masri, 2023. "Optimal Prediction of Wind Energy Resources Based on WOA—A Case Study in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Schweizer, Joerg & Antonini, Alessandro & Govoni, Laura & Gottardi, Guido & Archetti, Renata & Supino, Enrico & Berretta, Claudia & Casadei, Carlo & Ozzi, Claudia, 2016. "Investigating the potential and feasibility of an offshore wind farm in the Northern Adriatic Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 449-463.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223011817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.