IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v26y2001i4p431-439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and economic evaluation of building-integrated photovoltaics

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver, M.
  • Jackson, T.

Abstract

This paper applies energy analysis and economic analysis in order to assess the application of solar photovoltaics (PVs) in buildings. Comparison is made both to electricity supply from centralised PV plants and to conventional electricity sources. The comparison with conventional sources reveals that there is currently a significant trade-off between the environmental and economic implications of PVs: there are substantial resource benefits to be gained from using PVs to supply electricity, but the economic cost of doing so is significantly higher than conventional sources. This trade-off is reduced when the benefits of building integrated PVs (BiPVs) are considered. By comparison with centralised PV plants, BiPV systems offer the “double dividend” of reduced economic costs and improved environmental performance. This double dividend is increased if the economic and energy costs of avoided cladding materials are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver, M. & Jackson, T., 2001. "Energy and economic evaluation of building-integrated photovoltaics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 431-439.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:26:y:2001:i:4:p:431-439
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00009-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544201000093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00009-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, F., 1980. "Energy accounting of alternative energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Gusdorf, John, 1992. "Energy paybacks and renewable breeders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 17(12), pages 1137-1151.
    3. Oliver, M. & Jackson, T., 1999. "The market for solar photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 371-385, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lenzen, Manfred & Munksgaard, Jesper, 2002. "Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 339-362.
    2. Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2004. "Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 1099-1121, November.
    3. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Dunstan, D. & Probert, D., 2002. "Raising the effectiveness of electricity generation (per unit of fossil-fuel combusted) by less conventional means," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 103-138, October.
    5. Graf, Holger & Kalthaus, Martin, 2018. "International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1198-1214.
    6. Hernández-Moro, J. & Martínez-Duart, J.M., 2013. "Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 119-132.
    7. Nguyen, Ly & Kinnucan, Henry W., 2019. "The US solar panel anti-dumping duties versus uniform tariff," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 523-532.
    8. Painuly, J.P, 2001. "Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 73-89.
    9. Pallav Purohit & Axel Michaelowa, 2008. "CDM potential of SPV lighting systems in India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 23-46, January.
    10. Poullikkas, Andreas, 2007. "Implementation of distributed generation technologies in isolated power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 30-56, January.
    11. Yaqoot, Mohammed & Diwan, Parag & Kandpal, Tara C., 2016. "Review of barriers to the dissemination of decentralized renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 477-490.
    12. Velayudhan, S. K., 2003. "Dissemination of solar photovoltaics: a study on the government programme to promote solar lantern in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 1509-1518, November.
    13. Jackson, Tim & Oliver, Mark, 2000. "The viability of solar photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 983-988, November.
    14. Rosa, Luiz Pinguelli & Schaeffer, Roberto, 1995. "Global warming potentials : The case of emissions from dams," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 149-158, February.
    15. Cooke, R. & Cripps, A. & Irwin, A. & Kolokotroni, M., 2007. "Alternative energy technologies in buildings: Stakeholder perceptions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(14), pages 2320-2333.
    16. Peter, Raja & Dickie, Laurence & Peter, Vasanthi M., 2006. "Adoption of photovoltaic power supply systems: A study of key determinants in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2272-2283.
    17. Kaan Ozgun, 2020. "Towards a Sustainability Assessment Model for Urban Public Space Renewable Energy Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Andersson, Bjorn A. & Jacobsson, Staffan, 2000. "Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 1037-1049, November.
    19. Purohit, Pallav & Michaelowa, Axel, 2008. "CDM potential of SPV pumps in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 181-199, January.
    20. Oliver, M. & Jackson, T., 2000. "The evolution of economic and environmental cost for crystalline silicon photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 1011-1021, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:26:y:2001:i:4:p:431-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.