IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v6y1980i1p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy accounting of alternative energy sources

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, F.

Abstract

An energy accounting study has been made of the five alternative energy resource systems--solar, geothermal, wind, wave and tidal power. Owing to a lack of suitable data, a consistent methodology could not be pursued and a detailed comparison of these five systems with regard to likely energy ratios is not possible at the present time. (The energy ratio is here defined as being the total amount of energy obtained from a given system over its lifetime, divided by the total inputs of energy to that system in order to establish and maintain it in operation throughout its life.) There is a spread of possible energy ratios for each system studied, depending upon the assumptions made but, in each case, a value of about 10:1 is seen as a reasonable possibility for the future. The significance of this 10:1 energy ratio is that it could mean that our primary fossil fuel resources, when used to generate electricity through wind, wave or tidal power systems, would go about 33 times as far as they would if used in the conventional way. In the case of solar and geothermal energy, the savings factor would be somewhat less than 33; it could be somewhere between 6 and 30, depending upon system design, local conditions, etc. Energy pay-back times appear to be short for all the systems studied, the longest being about four-and-a-half years. This exercise has revealed just how much our primary non-renewable fuels could be conserved by using them to operate renewable energy resource systems although economic assessments at the present time might not provide justification for such a policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, F., 1980. "Energy accounting of alternative energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:6:y:1980:i:1:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(80)90038-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allen, S.R. & Hammond, G.P., 2010. "Thermodynamic and carbon analyses of micro-generators for UK households," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2223-2234.
    2. Kaan Ozgun, 2020. "Towards a Sustainability Assessment Model for Urban Public Space Renewable Energy Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Lenzen, Manfred & Wachsmann, Ulrike, 2004. "Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 119-130, February.
    4. Lenzen, Manfred & Munksgaard, Jesper, 2002. "Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 339-362.
    5. Xia, Junqiang & Falconer, Roger A. & Lin, Binliang, 2010. "Impact of different operating modes for a Severn Barrage on the tidal power and flood inundation in the Severn Estuary, UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2374-2391, July.
    6. Oliver, M. & Jackson, T., 2001. "Energy and economic evaluation of building-integrated photovoltaics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 431-439.
    7. Kaan Ozgun & Ian Weir & Debra Cushing, 2015. "Optimal Electricity Distribution Framework for Public Space: Assessing Renewable Energy Proposals for Freshkills Park, New York City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:6:y:1980:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.