IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v265y2023ics0360544222031747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-stage distributionally robust strategic offering in pool-based coupled electricity and gas market

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Cheng
  • Sayed, Ahmed Rabee
  • Zhang, Han
  • Zhang, Xian
  • Ren, Jianpeng
  • Jia, Qiyue
  • Bi, Tianshu

Abstract

The intensified interactions between power and gas systems and the wide utilization of renewable energy introduce additional challenges in energy marketing and pricing mechanisms. Existing studies either neglect energy uncertainties in deterministic market-clearing models, use predetermined strategic offering prices in single-level models, or approximate gas dynamics in nonrealistic models. This paper proposes a bi-level two-stage distributionally robust electricity–gas market clearing (EG-MC) model considering energy uncertainties and strategic offering prices from energy producers. Strategic energy producers submit their offering prices in the upper-level problem to the EG-MC operator, who maximizes market profits under the realizations of renewable energy outputs while balancing the robustness and conservativeness of the day-ahead market decisions. The presence of gas dynamics in the two stages of the decision-making framework generates an intractable EG-MC problem. A novel triple-loop procedure, namely inner and outer columns & constraints generation and bilinear approximation algorithms, is proposed to sufficiently solve the formulated model. Finally, numerical analyses on an EG-MC model demonstrate the effectiveness of the distributionally robust strategic offers and the performances of the solution methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Cheng & Sayed, Ahmed Rabee & Zhang, Han & Zhang, Xian & Ren, Jianpeng & Jia, Qiyue & Bi, Tianshu, 2023. "Two-stage distributionally robust strategic offering in pool-based coupled electricity and gas market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031747
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222031747
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noorollahi, Younes & Golshanfard, Aminabbas & Hashemi-Dezaki, Hamed, 2022. "A scenario-based approach for optimal operation of energy hub under different schemes and structures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Wang, Jian & Xin, Hao & Xie, Ning & Wang, Yong, 2022. "Equilibrium models of coordinated electricity and natural gas markets with different coupling information exchanging channels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. Khojasteh, Meysam & Faria, Pedro & Lezama, Fernando & Vale, Zita, 2022. "Optimal strategy of electricity and natural gas aggregators in the energy and balance markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Zhao, Baining & Qian, Tong & Tang, Wenhu & Liang, Qiheng, 2022. "A data-enhanced distributionally robust optimization method for economic dispatch of integrated electricity and natural gas systems with wind uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Francisco Facchinei & Christian Kanzow, 2010. "Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 177-211, March.
    6. Sayed, Ahmed R. & Wang, Cheng & Bi, Tianshu, 2019. "Resilient operational strategies for power systems considering the interactions with natural gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 548-566.
    7. Sayed, Ahmed Rabee & Wang, Cheng & Chen, Sheng & Shang, Ce & Bi, Tianshu, 2021. "Distributionally robust day-ahead operation of power systems with two-stage gas contracting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Pang, Kang Ying & Liew, Peng Yen & Woon, Kok Sin & Ho, Wai Shin & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2023. "Multi-period multi-objective optimisation model for multi-energy urban-industrial symbiosis with heat, cooling, power and hydrogen demands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Liu & Zhang, Kaitian & Zheng, Zhong & Chai, Yi & Lian, Xiaoyuan & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Zhaojun & Chen, Sujun, 2023. "Two-stage distributionally robust integrated scheduling of oxygen distribution and steelmaking-continuous casting in steel enterprises," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    2. Zhu, Yanmei & Zhou, Yerong & Tao, Xiangming & Chen, Shijun & Huang, Weibin & Ma, Guangwen, 2024. "A new clearing method for cascade hydropower spot market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Baining & Qian, Tong & Li, Weiwei & Xin, Yanli & Zhao, Wei & Lin, Zekang & Tang, Wenhu & Jin, Xin & Cao, Wangzhang & Pan, Tingzhe, 2024. "Fast distributed co-optimization of electricity and natural gas systems hedging against wind fluctuation and uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Oliver Stein & Nathan Sudermann-Merx, 2016. "The Cone Condition and Nonsmoothness in Linear Generalized Nash Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 687-709, August.
    3. Nadja Harms & Tim Hoheisel & Christian Kanzow, 2015. "On a Smooth Dual Gap Function for a Class of Player Convex Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 659-685, August.
    4. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2015. "It is a matter of hierarchy: a Nash equilibrium problem perspective on bilevel programming," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-07, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    5. Wang, Bohong & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Liang, Yongtu & Yuan, Meng & Zhang, Haoran & Liu, Jiayi, 2020. "Implementing hydrogen injection in coal-dominated regions: Supply chain optimisation and reliability analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Fang Yao & Xinan Zhang & Tat Kei Chau & Herbert Ho-ching Iu, 2023. "Robustly Cooperative Control of Transient Stability for Power System Considering Wind Power and Load Uncertainty by Distribution Preserving Graph Representation Learning (DPG)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Alexey Izmailov & Mikhail Solodov, 2014. "On error bounds and Newton-type methods for generalized Nash equilibrium problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 201-218, October.
    8. Armioun, Majid & Nazar, Mehrdad Setayesh & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Siano, Pierluigi, 2023. "Optimal scheduling of CCHP-based resilient energy distribution system considering active microgrids' multi-carrier energy transactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    9. Leonardo Galli & Christian Kanzow & Marco Sciandrone, 2018. "A nonmonotone trust-region method for generalized Nash equilibrium and related problems with strong convergence properties," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 629-652, April.
    10. Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 880-891.
    11. Otgochuluu, Ch. & Altangerel, L. & Battur, G. & Khashchuluun, Ch. & Dorjsundui, G., 2021. "A game theory application in the copper market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Migot, Tangi & Cojocaru, Monica-G., 2020. "A parametrized variational inequality approach to track the solution set of a generalized nash equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1136-1147.
    13. Abdul Rauf & Mahmoud Kassas & Muhammad Khalid, 2022. "Data-Driven Optimal Battery Storage Sizing for Grid-Connected Hybrid Distributed Generations Considering Solar and Wind Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Denizalp Goktas & Jiayi Zhao & Amy Greenwald, 2023. "T\^atonnement in Homothetic Fisher Markets," Papers 2306.04890, arXiv.org.
    15. Simone Sagratella, 2017. "Algorithms for generalized potential games with mixed-integer variables," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 689-717, December.
    16. Zhang, Yunfei & Zhou, Zhihua & Liu, Junwei & Yuan, Jianjuan, 2022. "Data augmentation for improving heating load prediction of heating substation based on TimeGAN," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Amir Gandomi & Amirhossein Bazargan & Saeed Zolfaghari, 2019. "Designing competitive loyalty programs: a stochastic game-theoretic model to guide the choice of reward structure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 267-298, September.
    18. Vladimir Shikhman, 2022. "On local uniqueness of normalized Nash equilibria," Papers 2205.13878, arXiv.org.
    19. Stein, Oliver & Sudermann-Merx, Nathan, 2018. "The noncooperative transportation problem and linear generalized Nash games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 543-553.
    20. A. Izmailov & M. Solodov, 2015. "Rejoinder on: Critical Lagrange multipliers: what we currently know about them, how they spoil our lives, and what we can do about it," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(1), pages 48-52, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.