IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v227y2021ics0360544221006496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative risk assessment of a high power density small modular reactor (SMR) core using uncertainty and sensitivity analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, Dinesh
  • Bahauddin Alam, Syed
  • Ridwan, Tuhfatur
  • Goodwin, Cameron S.

Abstract

The use of uncertainty quantification and machine learning platforms in ensuring the robustness of small modular reactor (or popularly known as SMR) core design is rare. Most importantly, there have not been many studies in SMR core design that need significant attention in terms of uncertainty quantification to ensure thermal-hydraulics safety. The majority of the previous SMR core studies have been limited to low core power density (∼60–65 MW/m3) environment, whereas typical land-based light-water cooled power reactors are operated in ∼100 MW/m3. In this paper, we attempt to fill the major gap in the robustness of SMR design system by using advanced VVUQ (Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification) approaches. Therefore, this work addresses the uncertainty issue and quantifies the sensitivity for the 100 MW/m3 SMR core system. Non-intrusive polynomial chaos, an efficient, well-developed, and validated approach, is applied to a subchannel thermal-hydraulic SMR system to compute the effect of input uncertainties on the SMR core. The impact of input uncertainties for 10% variability is evaluated on the key thermal-hydraulic parameters in the hot channel for the SMR reactor core with 100 MW/m3. It has been observed that all the output system parameters and their uncertainties are within the prescribed core safety limits for the 100 MW/m3 SMR core, except for the pressure drop and surface heat flux. It is also noticed that these two parameters exhibit an approximately 20% probability of exceeding the limiting values. The sensitivity analysis concluded that the pressure drop and surface heat flux are highly sensitive to the inlet temperature and linear power profile, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, Dinesh & Bahauddin Alam, Syed & Ridwan, Tuhfatur & Goodwin, Cameron S., 2021. "Quantitative risk assessment of a high power density small modular reactor (SMR) core using uncertainty and sensitivity analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221006496
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221006496
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.
    2. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    3. González Rodríguez, Daniel & Brayner de Oliveira Lira, Carlos Alberto & García Parra, Lázaro Roger & García Hernández, Carlos Rafael & de la Torre Valdés, Raciel, 2018. "Computational model of a sulfur-iodine thermochemical water splitting system coupled to a VHTR for nuclear hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1165-1176.
    4. Golpîra, Hêriş & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman, 2019. "A multi-objective risk-based robust optimization approach to energy management in smart residential buildings under combined demand and supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1113-1129.
    5. Roh, Seungkook & Choi, Jae Young & Chang, Soon Heung, 2019. "Modeling of nuclear power plant export competitiveness and its implications: The case of Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 157-169.
    6. Pantula, Priyanka D. & Mitra, Kishalay, 2019. "A data-driven approach towards finding closer estimates of optimal solutions under uncertainty for an energy efficient steel casting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Wang, Xiaojing & Zou, Zhengping, 2019. "Uncertainty analysis of impact of geometric variations on turbine blade performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 67-80.
    8. Kim, Hansung & Cheon, Hyungkyu & Ahn, Young-Hwan & Choi, Dong Gu, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and scenario generation of future solar photovoltaic price for use in energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 370-379.
    9. Kan, Xiaoming & Hedenus, Fredrik & Reichenberg, Lina, 2020. "The cost of a future low-carbon electricity system without nuclear power – the case of Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Ghahramani, Mehrdad & Nazari-Heris, Morteza & Zare, Kazem & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2019. "Energy and reserve management of a smart distribution system by incorporating responsive-loads /battery/wind turbines considering uncertain parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 205-219.
    11. Korprasertsak, Natapol & Leephakpreeda, Thananchai, 2019. "Robust short-term prediction of wind power generation under uncertainty via statistical interpretation of multiple forecasting models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 387-397.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cui, Chengcheng & Zhang, Junli & Shen, Jiong, 2023. "System-level modeling, analysis and coordinated control design for the pressurized water reactor nuclear power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Seyed Ali Hosseini & Reza Akbari & Amir Saeed Shirani & Francesco D’Auria, 2023. "Small Modular Reactors Licensing Process Based on BEPU Approach: Status and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shang, Xiaobing & Wang, Lipeng & Fang, Hai & Lu, Lingyun & Zhang, Zhi, 2024. "Active Learning of Ensemble Polynomial Chaos Expansion Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Toktarova, Alla & Walter, Viktor & Göransson, Lisa & Johnsson, Filip, 2022. "Interaction between electrified steel production and the north European electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    5. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    6. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    7. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Benim, Ali Cemal & Pfeiffelmann, Björn & Ocłoń, Paweł & Taler, Jan, 2019. "Computational investigation of a lifted hydrogen flame with LES and FGM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1172-1181.
    9. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    11. David Breitenmoser & Francesco Cerutti & Gernot Butterweck & Malgorzata Magdalena Kasprzak & Sabine Mayer, 2023. "Emulator-based Bayesian inference on non-proportional scintillation models by compton-edge probing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Zhang, Zhaoli & Alelyani, Sami M. & Zhang, Nan & Zeng, Chao & Yuan, Yanping & Phelan, Patrick E., 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel sodium hydroxide-water solution absorption refrigeration, heating and power system for low-temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2021. "Low-carbon options for the French power sector: What role for renewables, nuclear energy and carbon capture and storage?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    15. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "Real-time high-fidelity reliability updating with equality information using adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Heo, Jin Young & Kim, Min Seok & Baik, Seungjoon & Bae, Seong Jun & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle using an isothermal compressor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1118-1130.
    18. Yang, Hufang & Jiang, Ping & Wang, Ying & Li, Hongmin, 2022. "A fuzzy intelligent forecasting system based on combined fuzzification strategy and improved optimization algorithm for renewable energy power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    19. Olkkonen, Ville & Hirvonen, Janne & Heljo, Juhani & Syri, Sanna, 2021. "Effectiveness of building stock sustainability measures in a low-carbon energy system: A scenario analysis for Finland until 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221006496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.