IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v205y2020ics0360544220310112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed, Usama
  • Zhao, Yingjie
  • Huang, Yi
  • Cui, Yang
  • Shi, Lijuan
  • Li, Congming
  • Pourkashanian, Mohamed
  • Wei, Guoqiang
  • Yi, Qun
  • Nimmo, William

Abstract

Sawdust direct gasification using chemical looping with hematite as an oxygen carrier was investigated in a 10 kWth interconnected fluidized bed reactor. This was used to develop a biomass chemical looping gasification combined cycle (BCLGCC) model using Aspen Plus software. A technical analysis of a scaled up, simulated and validated 650 MW power plant using BCLG experimental results and industrial data was conducted. The analysis focused on investigating critical parameters that have a significant effect on syngas quality and quantity, hence optimizing the gasification process to obtain higher energy efficiencies for subsequent power generation. An economic and sustainability assessments comparing BCLGCC with 4 different power generation technologies with and w/o CCS was performed. BCLGCC presents promising economic and environmental results, showing that the efficiencies of the CCS and Non-CCS plants are equal to 36% and 41%, respectively, with a COE (including government renewable energy subsidies) for both CCS and Non-CCS equal to 15.9 ¢/kWh and 12.8 ¢/kWh, both of which are lower than the average COE in the UK (approximately 17.7 ¢/kWh). This highlights the technical and economic potential and feasibility of BCLGCC compared to conventional power generation processes while promoting Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Cui, Yang & Shi, Lijuan & Li, Congming & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Wei, Guoqiang & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2020. "Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:205:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220310112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220310112
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    2. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Wu, Pengbin, 2018. "Tech-economic assessment of second-generation CCS: Chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 915-927.
    3. Agbor, Ezinwa & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 433-449.
    4. Xu, Dikai & Zhang, Yitao & Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Guo, Mengqing & Qin, Lang & Chung, Cheng & Fan, Liang-Shih & Tong, Andrew, 2018. "A novel chemical looping partial oxidation process for thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 119-131.
    5. Han, Jun & Kim, Heejoon, 2008. "The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 397-416, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Heyu & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2024. "Experimental and process simulation on solid fuel chemical looping cascade utilization conversion technology aiming hydrogen generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Ying-jie & Yi, Qun & Shi, Li-juan & Wei, Guo-qing & Nimmo, William, 2021. "Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy and CO2 emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 366-387.
    3. Zaman, Sk Arafat & Ghosh, Sudip, 2024. "Novel integration of molten carbonate fuel cell stacks in a biomass-based Rankine cycle power plant with CO2 separation: A techno-economic and environmental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Florian Lebendig & Ibai Funcia & Rául Pérez-Vega & Michael Müller, 2022. "Investigations on the Effect of Pre-Treatment of Wheat Straw on Ash-Related Issues in Chemical Looping Gasification (CLG) in Comparison with Woody Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Tan, Liping & Cai, Lei & Fu, Yidan & Zhou, Zining & Guan, Yanwen, 2023. "Numerical investigation of biomass and liquefied natural gas driven oxy-fuel combustion power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 94-104.
    7. Nguyen Van Song & Thai Van Ha & Tran Duc Thuan & Nguyen Van Hanh & Dinh Van Tien & Nguyen Cong Tiep & Nguyen Thi Minh Phuong & Phan Anh Tu & Tran Ba Uan, 2021. "Development of Rice Husk Power Plants Based on Clean Development Mechanism: A Case Study in Mekong River Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Samprón, Iván & de Diego, Luis F. & García-Labiano, Francisco & Izquierdo, María T., 2021. "Optimization of synthesis gas production in the biomass chemical looping gasification process operating under auto-thermal conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Farajollahi, Hossein & Hossainpour, Siamak, 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass and coal co-fueled chemical looping combustion unit integrated with supercritical CO2 cycle and Organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    3. Gao, Ningbo & Śliz, Maciej & Quan, Cui & Bieniek, Artur & Magdziarz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass CO2 gasification with CaO looping for syngas production in a fixed-bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 652-661.
    4. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Ying-jie & Yi, Qun & Shi, Li-juan & Wei, Guo-qing & Nimmo, William, 2021. "Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy and CO2 emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 366-387.
    5. Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz, 2013. "Energetic analysis of a system integrated with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-278.
    6. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    7. Du, Shilin & Shu, Rui & Guo, Feiqiang & Mao, Songbo & Bai, Jiaming & Qian, Lin & Xin, Chengyun, 2022. "Porous coal char-based catalyst from coal gangue and lignite with high metal contents in the catalytic cracking of biomass tar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    9. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Zhou, Hui & Park, Ah-Hyung Alissa, 2020. "Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage via alkaline thermal Treatment: Production of high purity H2 from wet wheat straw grass with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Nzihou, Ange & Stanmore, Brian & Sharrock, Patrick, 2013. "A review of catalysts for the gasification of biomass char, with some reference to coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 305-317.
    12. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Hou, Yunbing & Li, Hui & Wang, Pengtao, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Chen, Guanyi & Yao, Jingang & Liu, Jing & Yan, Beibei & Shan, Rui, 2016. "Biomass to hydrogen-rich syngas via catalytic steam reforming of bio-oil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 315-322.
    16. Magoua Mbeugang, Christian Fabrice & Li, Bin & Lin, Dan & Xie, Xing & Wang, Shuaijun & Wang, Shuang & Zhang, Shu & Huang, Yong & Liu, Dongjing & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Hydrogen rich syngas production from sorption enhanced gasification of cellulose in the presence of calcium oxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Cao, Bin & Wang, Shuang & Hu, Yamin & Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah & Qian, Lili & He, Zhixia & Wang, Qian & Uzoejinwa, Benjamin Bernard & Esakkimuthu, Sivakumar, 2019. "Effect of washing with diluted acids on Enteromorpha clathrata pyrolysis products: Towards enhanced bio-oil from seaweeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 29-38.
    18. Gao, Chengkang & Zhu, Sulong & An, Nan & Na, Hongming & You, Huan & Gao, Chengbo, 2021. "Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Zhao, Haibo & Guo, Lei & Zou, Xixian, 2015. "Chemical-looping auto-thermal reforming of biomass using Cu-based oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 408-415.
    20. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:205:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220310112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.