IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v188y2019ics0360544219317712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and optimization of a pilot-scale entrained-flow gasifier using artificial neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Han
  • Chaffart, Donovan
  • Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis A.

Abstract

This paper explores the construction and validation of an artificial neural network (ANN) in order to accurately and efficiently predict the performance of a pilot-scale gasifier unit. This ANN model consists of multiple sub-networks that individually predict each of the desired gasifier outputs as a function of key system parameters. The ANN was trained using data generated for a large set of randomly-generated input conditions from a pilot-scale gasifier reduced order model (ROM) developed previously. The fully-trained ANN was validated by comparing its performance to the aforementioned ROM model. The validated ANN model was subsequently implemented into two optimization studies in order to determine the operating conditions necessary to maximize the carbon conversion under different limitations for the peak temperature of the gasifier and to determine the ideal input conditions of maximizing both the carbon conversion and production of hydrogen gas which are two conflicting objectives. This case study further showcases the benefit of the ANN, which was able to obtain accurate predictions for the gasifier results similar to the results generated by the ROM model at a much lower computational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Han & Chaffart, Donovan & Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis A., 2019. "Modelling and optimization of a pilot-scale entrained-flow gasifier using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317712
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219317712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2007. "A centurial history of technological change and learning curves or pulverized coal-fired utility boilers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt96z5s545, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2007. "A centurial history of technological change and learning curves for pulverized coal-fired utility boilers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1996-2005.
    3. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S, 2007. "A centurial history of technological change and learning curves or pulverized coal-fired utility boilers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3zz2w2wr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Charry-Sanchez, Jennifer & Betancourt-Torcat, Alberto & Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis, 2014. "An optimization energy model for the upgrading processes of Canadian unconventional oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 629-643.
    5. Christou, Costas & Hadjipaschalis, Ioannis & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2008. "Assessment of integrated gasification combined cycle technology competitiveness," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(9), pages 2459-2471, December.
    6. Betancourt-Torcat, Alberto & Elkamel, Ali & Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis, 2012. "A modeling study of the effect of carbon dioxide mitigation strategies, natural gas prices and steam consumption on the Canadian Oil Sands operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1018-1033.
    7. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2007. "A centurial history of technological change and learning curves or pulverized coal-fired utility boilers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1f25b3xq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward, 2007. "A centurial history of technological change and learning curves or pulverized coal-fired utility boilers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4xn4w7rn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Zhikai & Wu, Qi & Zhou, Hua & Chen, Pingping & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Dynamic modeling, systematic analysis, and operation optimization for shell entrained-flow heavy residue gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Zhang, Zhonglian & Yang, Xiaohui & Yang, Li & Wang, Zhaojun & Huang, Zezhong & Wang, Xiaopeng & Mei, Linghao, 2023. "Optimal configuration of double carbon energy system considering climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Wang, Kangcheng & Zhang, Jie & Shang, Chao & Huang, Dexian, 2021. "Operation optimization of Shell coal gasification process based on convolutional neural network models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Qiang & Shi, Minjun & Jiang, Kejun, 2009. "New power generation technology options under the greenhouse gases mitigation scenario in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2440-2449, June.
    2. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    3. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2012. "A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 762-771.
    4. Jindal, Abhinav & Nilakantan, Rahul, 2021. "Falling efficiency levels of Indian coal-fired power plants: A slacks-based analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Li, Sheng & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong & Lin, Hu & Jin, Hongguang, 2012. "Evaluation of cost reduction potential for a coal based polygeneration system with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 101-106.
    6. Neij, Lena, 2008. "Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 2200-2211, June.
    7. Kim, Seunghyok & Koo, Jamin & Lee, Chang Jun & Yoon, En Sup, 2012. "Optimization of Korean energy planning for sustainability considering uncertainties in learning rates and external factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 126-134.
    8. Kemp, Alexander G. & Sola Kasim, A., 2010. "A futuristic least-cost optimisation model of CO2 transportation and storage in the UK/UK Continental Shelf," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3652-3667, July.
    9. Kaminski, Jacek & KudeLko, Mariusz, 2010. "The prospects for hard coal as a fuel for the Polish power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7939-7950, December.
    10. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Atsonios, Konstantinos & Panopoulos, Kyriakos D. & Karellas, Sotirios & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2014. "Economic evaluation of decentralized pyrolysis for the production of bio-oil as an energy carrier for improved logistics towards a large centralized gasification plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 57-72.
    11. Saidur, R. & Ahamed, J.U. & Masjuki, H.H., 2010. "Energy, exergy and economic analysis of industrial boilers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2188-2197, May.
    12. Hong, Sungjun & Chung, Yanghon & Woo, Chungwon, 2015. "Scenario analysis for estimating the learning rate of photovoltaic power generation based on learning curve theory in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 80-89.
    13. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    14. Muratori, Matteo & Ledna, Catherine & McJeon, Haewon & Kyle, Page & Patel, Pralit & Kim, Son H. & Wise, Marshall & Kheshgi, Haroon S. & Clarke, Leon E. & Edmonds, Jae, 2017. "Cost of power or power of cost: A U.S. modeling perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 861-874.
    15. Matteson, Schuyler & Williams, Eric, 2015. "Residual learning rates in lead-acid batteries: Effects on emerging technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 71-79.
    16. McNerney, James & Doyne Farmer, J. & Trancik, Jessika E., 2011. "Historical costs of coal-fired electricity and implications for the future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3042-3054, June.
    17. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Barma, M.C. & Saidur, R. & Rahman, S.M.A. & Allouhi, A. & Akash, B.A. & Sait, Sadiq M., 2017. "A review on boilers energy use, energy savings, and emissions reductions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 970-983.
    19. Niknam, Pouriya H & Sciacovelli, Adriano, 2023. "Hybrid PCM-steam thermal energy storage for industrial processes – Link between thermal phenomena and techno-economic performance through dynamic modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    20. Sebastián, F. & Royo, J. & Gómez, M., 2011. "Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2029-2037.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.