IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v139y2017icp341-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental benefits analysis based on life cycle assessment of rice straw-based synthetic natural gas in China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Fei
  • Song, Guohui
  • Shen, Laihong
  • Xiao, Jun

Abstract

A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of rice straw-based synthetic natural gas (R-SNG) production was carried out in this study, and the inventories of rice straw cultivating and harvesting, feedstock transportation, R-SNG facility construction and dismantling, and power consumption (i.e. purchased electricity (PE) scheme and self-supply power (SP) scheme) stages were analyzed. Then, the inventory data was characterized and normalized. The results showed that the SP scheme can significantly reduce the environmental impacts of R-SNG product. A comparison of R-SNG, natural gas (NG) and coal-based synthetic natural gas (C-SNG) was conducted from the perspective of environmental impacts. The results showed that the amount of CO2 emission from C-SNG was the largest, followed by that from NG, while the amount of CO2 emission from R-SNG was negative. A sensitivity analysis about allocation principles of the rice straw and rough rice was carried out to evaluate the allocation principles on the environmental impacts. In conclusion, R-SNG showed great environmental benefits in the abiotic resources saving and greenhouse gases emission reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Fei & Song, Guohui & Shen, Laihong & Xiao, Jun, 2017. "Environmental benefits analysis based on life cycle assessment of rice straw-based synthetic natural gas in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 341-349.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:139:y:2017:i:c:p:341-349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217313610
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vitasari, Caecilia R. & Jurascik, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2011. "Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3825-3837.
    2. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2019. "The role of life cycle assessment in the sustainable transition to a decarbonised gas network through green gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 16-28.
    2. Siti Norliyana Harun & Marlia Mohd Hanafiah & Noorashikin Md Noor, 2022. "Rice Straw Utilisation for Bioenergy Production: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Cui, Peizhe & Zhang, Jifu & Liu, Yangyang & Zhou, Yaru & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of clean fuel vehicle life cycle environment under multiple fuel scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Yao, Dong & Xu, Zaifeng & Qi, Huaqing & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong & Cui, Peizhe, 2022. "Carbon footprint and water footprint analysis of generating synthetic natural gas from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 780-789.
    6. Liu, Beibei & Wu, Qiaoran & Wang, Feng & Zhang, Bing, 2019. "Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 393-402.
    7. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Yan, Chao & Gu, Haiming & Zhao, Hao, 2022. "Quality of gaseous biofuels: Statistical assessment and guidance on production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Jinying Li & Jiaming Xu & Xin Tan, 2018. "Dynamic Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of the Transnational Power Grid Interconnection Project Based on Combination Weighting and TOPSIS Grey Projection Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Ardolino, Filomena & Lodato, Concetta & Astrup, Thomas F. & Arena, Umberto, 2018. "Energy recovery from plastic and biomass waste by means of fluidized bed gasification: A life cycle inventory model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 299-314.
    10. Zhanwu Wang & Guangyin Xu & Zhenfeng Wang & Zhiping Zhang, 2022. "Sustainability of agricultural waste power generation industry in China: criteria relationship identification and policy design mechanism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3371-3395, March.
    11. Siwen Zhang & Haiming Gu & Jing Qian & Wioletta Raróg-Pilecka & Yuan Wang & Qijing Wu & Hao Zhao, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of High-Safety and Cost-Effective Syngas Produced by O 2 -Enriched Air Gasification with 40–70% O 2 Purity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Huang, Y.W. & Chen, M.Q. & Li, Y. & Guo, J., 2016. "Modeling of chemical exergy of agricultural biomass using improved general regression neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1164-1175.
    3. Tomków, Łukasz & Cholewiński, Maciej, 2015. "Improvement of the LNG (liquid natural gas) regasification efficiency by utilizing the cold exergy with a coupled absorption – ORC (organic Rankine cycle)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 645-653.
    4. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    5. Mousavi, Seyed Ali & Toopshekan, Ashkan & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2023. "Comprehensive exergetic performance assessment and techno-financial optimization of off-grid hybrid renewable configurations with various dispatch strategies and solar tracking systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 40-63.
    6. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Rastegari, Hajar & Ghaziaskar, Hassan S. & Valijanian, Elena, 2018. "Exergy-based optimization of a continuous reactor applied to produce value-added chemicals from glycerol through esterification with acetic acid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 351-362.
    7. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong, 2014. "Exergy analysis and the energy saving mechanism for coal to synthetic/substitute natural gas and power cogeneration system without and with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-561.
    8. Siwen Zhang & Haiming Gu & Jing Qian & Wioletta Raróg-Pilecka & Yuan Wang & Qijing Wu & Hao Zhao, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of High-Safety and Cost-Effective Syngas Produced by O 2 -Enriched Air Gasification with 40–70% O 2 Purity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Wang, Yongzhen & Zhang, Lanlan & Song, Yi & Han, Kai & Zhang, Yan & Zhu, Yilin & Kang, Ligai, 2024. "State-of-the-art review on evaluation indicators of integrated intelligent energy from different perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    10. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    11. Silva Ortiz, Pablo & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2014. "Exergy analysis of pretreatment processes of bioethanol production based on sugarcane bagasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-138.
    12. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    13. Oliveira, V.B. & Simões, M. & Melo, L.F. & Pinto, A.M.F.R., 2013. "A 1D mathematical model for a microbial fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 463-471.
    14. Kohl, T. & Laukkanen, T. & Tuomaala, M. & Niskanen, T. & Siitonen, S. & Järvinen, M.P. & Ahtila, P., 2014. "Comparison of energy efficiency assessment methods: Case Bio-SNG process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 88-98.
    15. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    16. Fallahi, Alireza & Farzad, Somayeh & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Lam, Su Shiung & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2019. "Evaluation of an optimal integrated design multi-fuel multi-product electrical power plant by energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-78.
    18. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan, 2017. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coke production process with waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 435-450.
    19. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Hosseini, Seyed Sina & Najafpour, Ghasem & Younesi, Habibollah, 2016. "An exergetically-sustainable operational condition of a photo-biohydrogen production system optimized using conventional and innovative fuzzy techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 605-618.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:139:y:2017:i:c:p:341-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.