IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v138y2017icp1281-1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery for integrated ethanol and methanol production

Author

Listed:
  • Albarelli, Juliana Q.
  • Onorati, Sandro
  • Caliandro, Priscilla
  • Peduzzi, Emanuela
  • Meireles, M Angela A.
  • Marechal, François
  • Ensinas, Adriano V.

Abstract

The present study evaluates a sugarcane biorefinery producing ethanol through juice fermentation and methanol via gasification of sugarcane lignocellulosic residues and liquid fuel synthesis. Two technologies of gasification named entrained flow and circulating fluidized bed are compared. Flowsheet modeling and thermo-economic analysis methods are applied, followed by a multi-objective optimization based on a genetic algorithm. The optimum Ethanol–Methanol biorefinery design options are compared with other previously studied sugarcane biorefineries. The results show that the biorefinery's energy efficiency increases significantly with the integration of a methanol production plant in a conventional ethanol distillery. The configuration using an entrained flow gasifier presents lower conversion efficiency than the one using a circulating fluidized bed gasifier. However, for the entrained flow gasifier configuration, the size of the methanol production process could be bigger since more heat is available for the ethanol process favouring the integration with the ethanol plant. Higher energy efficiency due to increase of methanol production leads to a higher total investment for both gasification technologies. The cost analysis shows that the calculated methanol production cost is 30% higher than its current market price. Environmental incentives for biofuels could change this scenario but are not in the scope of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Albarelli, Juliana Q. & Onorati, Sandro & Caliandro, Priscilla & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Meireles, M Angela A. & Marechal, François & Ensinas, Adriano V., 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery for integrated ethanol and methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1281-1290.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:1281-1290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215008609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dias, Marina O.S. & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Filho, Rubens Maciel & Rossell, Carlos E.V., 2011. "Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3691-3703.
    2. Molyneaux, A. & Leyland, G. & Favrat, D., 2010. "Environomic multi-objective optimisation of a district heating network considering centralized and decentralized heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 751-758.
    3. Renó, Maria Luiza Grillo & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Buchgeister, Jens & Almazan, Oscar, 2011. "A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3716-3726.
    4. Trop, P. & Anicic, B. & Goricanec, D., 2014. "Production of methanol from a mixture of torrefied biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 125-132.
    5. Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Ensinas, Adriano & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2014. "New alternatives for the fermentation process in the ethanol production from sugarcane: Extractive and low temperature fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 595-604.
    6. Peduzzi, Emanuela & Tock, Laurence & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Maréchal, François, 2013. "Thermo-economic evaluation and optimization of the thermo-chemical conversion of biomass into methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 9-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Pavão, Leandro V. & Santos, Lucas F. & Oliveira, Cássia M. & Cruz, Antonio J.G. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S. & Costa, Caliane B.B., 2023. "Flexible heat integration system in first-/second-generation ethanol production via screening pinch-based method and multiperiod model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Lemos, Stella Vannucci & Salgado, Alexandre Pereira & Duarte, Alexandre & de Souza, Marco Antonio Alves & de Almeida Antunes, Fernanda, 2019. "Agroindustrial best practices that contribute to technical efficiency in Brazilian sugar and ethanol production mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 397-411.
    4. Zhang, Hanfei & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid-oxide electrolyzers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Oliveira, Sydnei Marssal de & Ribeiro, Celma de Oliveira & Cicogna, Maria Paula Vieira, 2018. "Uncertainty effects on production mix and on hedging decisions: The case of Brazilian ethanol and sugar," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 516-524.
    6. Im-orb, Karittha & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2020. "Process and sustainability analyses of the integrated biomass pyrolysis, gasification, and methanol synthesis process for methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mandegari, Mohsen & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Farzad, Somayeh & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 623-638.
    9. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of biomass-to-methanol with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison of 100% renewable urea production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François & Ensinas, Adriano, 2018. "Review of design works for the conversion of sugarcane to first and second-generation ethanol and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 152-164.
    2. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 284-294.
    4. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Zhen, Xudong & Wang, Yang, 2013. "Study of ignition in a high compression ratio SI (spark ignition) methanol engine using LES (large eddy simulation) with detailed chemical kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 549-558.
    6. Bracco, Stefano & Delfino, Federico & Pampararo, Fabio & Robba, Michela & Rossi, Mansueto, 2013. "The University of Genoa smart polygeneration microgrid test-bed facility: The overall system, the technologies and the research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 442-459.
    7. Hegely, Laszlo & Lang, Peter, 2020. "Reduction of the energy demand of a second-generation bioethanol plant by heat integration and vapour recompression between different columns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Patel, Vimal R. & Patel, Darshil & Varia, Nandan S. & Patel, Rajesh N., 2017. "Co-gasification of lignite and waste wood in a pilot-scale (10 kWe) downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 834-844.
    9. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Konstantinos Kappis & Joan Papavasiliou & George Avgouropoulos, 2021. "Methanol Reforming Processes for Fuel Cell Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore S. & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2015. "The influence of biomass supply chains and by-products on the greenhouse gas emissions from gasification-based bio-SNG production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 148-162.
    12. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David & Collado-Fernández, Eduardo, 2016. "Evaluation of the cost of using power plant reject heat in low-temperature district heating and cooling networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 892-907.
    13. Somorin, Tosin Onabanjo & Di Lorenzo, Giuseppina & Kolios, Athanasios J., 2017. "Life-cycle assessment of self-generated electricity in Nigeria and Jatropha biodiesel as an alternative power fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 966-979.
    14. Manuel Raul Pelaez-Samaniego & Juan L. Espinoza & José Jara-Alvear & Pablo Arias-Reyes & Fernando Maldonado-Arias & Patricia Recalde-Galindo & Pablo Rosero & Tsai Garcia-Perez, 2020. "Potential and Impacts of Cogeneration in Tropical Climate Countries: Ecuador as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Ji, Xi & Long, Xianling, 2016. "A review of the ecological and socioeconomic effects of biofuel and energy policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 41-52.
    16. Li, Hongtao & Marechal, Francois & Favrat, Daniel, 2010. "Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typification in the context of CO2 abatement part I: Power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3143-3154.
    17. Botshekan, Maryam & Moheb, Ahmad & Vatankhah, Fatemeh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Shafiei, Marzieh, 2022. "Energy saving alternatives for renewable ethanol production with the focus on separation/purification units: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    18. Vasileios Ntouros & Ioannis Kousis & Dimitra Papadaki & Anna Laura Pisello & Margarita Niki Assimakopoulos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Different Synthetic Routes of ZIF-8 Nanomaterials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Bechara, Rami & Gomez, Adrien & Saint-Antonin, Valérie & Schweitzer, Jean-Marc & Maréchal, François, 2016. "Methodology for the optimal design of an integrated sugarcane distillery and cogeneration process for ethanol and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 540-549.
    20. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Peng, Zhenwei & Feng, Yifu, 2017. "Planning community energy system in the industry 4.0 era: Achievements, challenges and a potential solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 710-721.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:1281-1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.