IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v138y2017icp1175-1186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degradation prediction of PEM fuel cell using a moving window based hybrid prognostic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Daming
  • Gao, Fei
  • Breaz, Elena
  • Ravey, Alexandre
  • Miraoui, Abdellatif

Abstract

In this paper, an innovative robust prediction algorithm for performance degradation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is proposed based on a combination of model-based and data-driven prognostic method. A novel approach using the moving window method is applied, in order to 1) train the developed models; 2) update the weight factors of each method and 3) further fuse the predicted results iteratively. In the proposed approach, both model-based and data-driven methods are simultaneously used to achieve a better accuracy. During the prediction process, each dataset in the proposed moving window are divided into three sections respectively: training, evaluation and prediction. The training data are used first to identify the models parameters. The evaluation data are then used to measure the weight of each method, which represents the degree of confidence of each method in the actual state. Based on these dynamically adjusting weight factors, the prediction results from different methods are then fused using weighted average methodology to calculate the final prediction results. In order to verify the proposed method, three experimental validations with different aging testing profiles have been performed. The results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid prognostic approach can achieve a higher accuracy than conventional prediction methods. In addition, in order to find the satisfactory trade-off between the prediction accuracy and forecast time for optimizing on-line prognostic, the performance variation of proposed approach with different moving window length is further showed and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Daming & Gao, Fei & Breaz, Elena & Ravey, Alexandre & Miraoui, Abdellatif, 2017. "Degradation prediction of PEM fuel cell using a moving window based hybrid prognostic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1175-1186.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:1175-1186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217312732
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felgenhauer, Markus F. & Pellow, Matthew A. & Benson, Sally M. & Hamacher, Thomas, 2016. "Evaluating co-benefits of battery and fuel cell vehicles in a community in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 360-368.
    2. Cappa, Francesco & Facci, Andrea Luigi & Ubertini, Stefano, 2015. "Proton exchange membrane fuel cell for cooperating households: A convenient combined heat and power solution for residential applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1229-1238.
    3. Chen, Huicui & Pei, Pucheng & Song, Mancun, 2015. "Lifetime prediction and the economic lifetime of Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 154-163.
    4. Chen, Ben & Wang, Jun & Yang, Tianqi & Cai, Yonghua & Zhang, Caizhi & Chan, Siew Hwa & Yu, Yi & Tu, Zhengkai, 2016. "Carbon corrosion and performance degradation mechanism in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with dead-ended anode and cathode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 54-62.
    5. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    6. Hu, Xiaosong & Li, Shengbo Eben & Jia, Zhenzhong & Egardt, Bo, 2014. "Enhanced sample entropy-based health management of Li-ion battery for electrified vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 953-960.
    7. Roshandel, Ramin & Parhizkar, Tarannom, 2016. "Degradation based optimization framework for long term applications of energy systems, case study: Solid oxide fuel cell stacks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 172-181.
    8. Çay, Yusuf & Korkmaz, Ibrahim & Çiçek, Adem & Kara, Fuat, 2013. "Prediction of engine performance and exhaust emissions for gasoline and methanol using artificial neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 177-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Bing & Wan, Kechuang & Xie, Meng & Chu, Tiankuo & Wang, Xiaolei & Li, Xiang & Yang, Daijun & Ming, Pingwen & Zhang, Cunman, 2022. "Durability degradation mechanism and consistency analysis for proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Du, Jiuyu & Ouyang, Minggao & Chen, Jingfu, 2017. "Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016–2020: Ambition and rationality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 584-596.
    3. Chen, Huicui & Zhao, Xin & Qu, Bingwang & Zhang, Tong & Pei, Pucheng & Li, Congxin, 2018. "An evaluation method of gas distribution quality in dynamic process of proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 26-35.
    4. Abdin, Z. & Webb, C.J. & Gray, E.MacA., 2016. "PEM fuel cell model and simulation in Matlab–Simulink based on physical parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1131-1144.
    5. Gabriele Loreti & Andrea Luigi Facci & Stefano Ubertini, 2021. "High-Efficiency Combined Heat and Power through a High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Hybrid System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Muhammad Usman & Haris Hussain & Fahid Riaz & Muneeb Irshad & Rehmat Bashir & Muhammad Haris Shah & Adeel Ahmad Zafar & Usman Bashir & M. A. Kalam & M. A. Mujtaba & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar, 2021. "Artificial Neural Network Led Optimization of Oxyhydrogen Hybridized Diesel Operated Engine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Francesco Cappa & Fausto Del Sette & Darren Hayes & Federica Rosso, 2016. "How to Deliver Open Sustainable Innovation: An Integrated Approach for a Sustainable Marketable Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Abdollahzadeh, M. & Ribeirinha, P. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2018. "Three-dimensional modeling of PEMFC with contaminated anode fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 939-959.
    10. Sanghyun Yun & Jinwon Yun & Jaeyoung Han, 2023. "Development of a 470-Horsepower Fuel Cell–Battery Hybrid Xcient Dynamic Model Using Simscape TM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Lu Zhang & Yongfeng Liu & Pucheng Pei & Xintong Liu & Long Wang & Yuan Wan, 2022. "Variation Characteristic Analysis of Water Content at the Flow Channel of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Yi Zhang & Qiang Guo & Jie Song, 2023. "Internet-Distributed Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Platform for Plug-In Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Najafi, Gholamhassan & Ghobadian, Barat & Yusaf, Talal & Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad & Mamat, Rizalman, 2015. "Optimization of performance and exhaust emission parameters of a SI (spark ignition) engine with gasoline–ethanol blended fuels using response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1815-1829.
    14. Feng Lu & Jipeng Jiang & Jinquan Huang & Xiaojie Qiu, 2018. "An Iterative Reduced KPCA Hidden Markov Model for Gas Turbine Performance Fault Diagnosis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Jiang, Yunfeng & Xia, Bing & Zhao, Xin & Nguyen, Truong & Mi, Chris & de Callafon, Raymond A., 2017. "Data-based fractional differential models for non-linear dynamic modeling of a lithium-ion battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 171-181.
    16. Xing, Lei & Du, Shangfeng & Chen, Rui & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith, 2016. "Anode partial flooding modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Model development and validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 80-95.
    17. Ma, Rui & Yang, Tao & Breaz, Elena & Li, Zhongliang & Briois, Pascal & Gao, Fei, 2018. "Data-driven proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation predication through deep learning method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 102-115.
    18. Zhang, Tong & Wang, Peiqi & Chen, Huicui & Pei, Pucheng, 2018. "A review of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation under start-stop operating condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 249-262.
    19. Zhou, Dengji & Yao, Qinbo & Wu, Hang & Ma, Shixi & Zhang, Huisheng, 2020. "Fault diagnosis of gas turbine based on partly interpretable convolutional neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Wu, Jinglai & Zhang, Yunqing & Ruan, Jiageng & Liang, Zhaowen & Liu, Kai, 2023. "Rule and optimization combined real-time energy management strategy for minimizing cost of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:1175-1186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.