IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v116y2016ip1p517-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interplay of inlet temperature and humidity on energy penalty for CO2 post-combustion capture: Rigorous analysis and simulation of a single stage gas permeation process

Author

Listed:
  • Giordano, Lorena
  • Roizard, Denis
  • Bounaceur, Roda
  • Favre, Eric

Abstract

Over the last decade, membrane separation processes have attracted considerable research attention. This is due to their potential for lowering the costs of post-combustion CO2 capture compared with the more established technologies, which are based on the use of chemical solvents. It is well known that the performance of membrane-based CO2 capture is related to several factors, including flue gas composition, membrane material and system design. Membrane working temperature is one of the operating parameters that have several implications on the CO2 separation process. However, surprisingly, this key operating variable has not been investigated in detail. It not only influences the intrinsic membrane properties and the feed composition but also indirectly affects the energy behavior of the whole capture system. Hence, the resulting outcome cannot be intuitively deduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Giordano, Lorena & Roizard, Denis & Bounaceur, Roda & Favre, Eric, 2016. "Interplay of inlet temperature and humidity on energy penalty for CO2 post-combustion capture: Rigorous analysis and simulation of a single stage gas permeation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 517-525.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:116:y:2016:i:p1:p:517-525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216314013
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mondal, Monoj Kumar & Balsora, Hemant Kumar & Varshney, Prachi, 2012. "Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 431-441.
    2. Bounaceur, Roda & Lape, Nancy & Roizard, Denis & Vallieres, Cécile & Favre, Eric, 2006. "Membrane processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: A parametric study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2556-2570.
    3. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz, 2012. "Optimisation of the connection of membrane CCS installation with a supercritical coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 118-127.
    4. Belaissaoui, Bouchra & Cabot, Gilles & Cabot, Marie-Sophie & Willson, David & Favre, Eric, 2012. "An energetic analysis of CO2 capture on a gas turbine combining flue gas recirculation and membrane separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-175.
    5. Kotowicz, Janusz & Chmielniak, Tadeusz & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna, 2010. "The influence of membrane CO2 separation on the efficiency of a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 841-850.
    6. Zhai, Haibo & Rubin, Edward S., 2010. "Performance and cost of wet and dry cooling systems for pulverized coal power plants with and without carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5653-5660, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Persis, Stéphanie & Foucher, Fabrice & Pillier, Laure & Osorio, Vladimiro & Gökalp, Iskender, 2013. "Effects of O2 enrichment and CO2 dilution on laminar methane flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1055-1066.
    2. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    4. Nguyen, Ngoc N. & La, Vinh T. & Huynh, Chinh D. & Nguyen, Anh V., 2022. "Technical and economic perspectives of hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Peydayesh, Mohammad & Mohammadi, Toraj & Bakhtiari, Omid, 2017. "Effective hydrogen purification from methane via polyimide Matrimid® 5218- Deca-dodecasil 3R type zeolite mixed matrix membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2100-2107.
    7. Belaissaoui, Bouchra & Cabot, Gilles & Cabot, Marie-Sophie & Willson, David & Favre, Eric, 2012. "An energetic analysis of CO2 capture on a gas turbine combining flue gas recirculation and membrane separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-175.
    8. Zhang, Yingying & Ji, Xiaoyan & Lu, Xiaohua, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation from gas mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 237-243.
    9. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2014. "Efficiency analysis of a hard-coal-fired supercritical power plant with a four-end high-temperature membrane for air separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 109-119.
    10. Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Liu, Yinan & Zhao, Qing & He, Junnan & Zhao, Li, 2017. "Carbon pump: Fundamental theory and applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1131-1143.
    11. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    12. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Ji, Na & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Li, Yang & Kitamura, Yutaka, 2017. "Reducing the energy consumption of membrane-cryogenic hybrid CO2 capture by process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 29-39.
    13. Kobayashi, Makoto & Akiho, Hiroyuki & Nakao, Yoshinobu, 2015. "Performance evaluation of porous sodium aluminate sorbent for halide removal process in oxy-fuel IGCC power generation plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 320-327.
    14. Peer, Rebecca A.M. & Sanders, Kelly T., 2018. "The water consequences of a transitioning US power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 613-622.
    15. Narukulla, Ramesh & Chaturvedi, Krishna Raghav & Ojha, Umaprasana & Sharma, Tushar, 2022. "Carbon dioxide capturing evaluation of polyacryloyl hydrazide solutions via rheological analysis for carbon utilization applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    17. Yang, Lin & Lv, Haodong & Jiang, Dalin & Fan, Jingli & Zhang, Xian & He, Weijun & Zhou, Jinsheng & Wu, Wenjing, 2020. "Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Zhihua Zhang, 2015. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities Coupled to Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1069-1080, November.
    19. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.
    20. Budzianowski, Wojciech Marcin, 2011. "Can ‘negative net CO2 emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6318-6325.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:116:y:2016:i:p1:p:517-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.