IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v106y2016icp712-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective optimization framework for risk-controlled integration of renewable generation into electric power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Mena, Rodrigo
  • Hennebel, Martin
  • Li, Yan-Fu
  • Zio, Enrico

Abstract

We introduce a MOO (multi-objective optimization) framework for the integration of renewable DG (distributed generation) into electric power networks. The framework searches for the optimal size and location of different DG technologies, taking into account uncertainties related to primary renewable resources availability, components failures, power demands and bulk-power supply. A non-sequential MCS-OPF (Monte Carlo simulation and optimal power flow) computational model is developed to emulate the network operation by generating random scenarios from the diverse sources of uncertainty, and assess the system performance in terms of CG (global cost). To measure uncertainty in the system performance, we introduce the DCVaR (conditional value-at-risk deviation) which, due to its axiomatic relation to the CVaR (conditional value-at-risk), allows the conjoint control of risk. A MOO strategy can, then, be adopted for the concurrent minimization of the ECG (expected global cost) and the associated deviation DCVaR(CG). In our work this is operatively implemented by a heuristic search engine based on differential evolution (MOO-DE). An example of application of the proposed framework is given with regards to the IEEE 30 bus test system, where in DCVaR is shown capable of enabling and controlling tradeoffs between optimal expected economic performance, uncertainty and risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Mena, Rodrigo & Hennebel, Martin & Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "A multi-objective optimization framework for risk-controlled integration of renewable generation into electric power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 712-727.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:106:y:2016:i:c:p:712-727
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216303000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Rockafellar & Stan Uryasev & Michael Zabarankin, 2006. "Generalized deviations in risk analysis," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 51-74, January.
    2. Chang, Tian-Pau & Liu, Feng-Jiao & Ko, Hong-Hsi & Cheng, Shih-Ping & Sun, Li-Chung & Kuo, Shye-Chorng, 2014. "Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-95.
    3. Yang, Yun & Zhang, Shijie & Xiao, Yunhan, 2015. "Optimal design of distributed energy resource systems coupled with energy distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 433-448.
    4. Li, Yanfu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "Uncertainty analysis of the adequacy assessment model of a distributed generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 235-244.
    5. Viral, Rajkumar & Khatod, D.K., 2012. "Optimal planning of distributed generation systems in distribution system: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5146-5165.
    6. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    7. Ren, Hongbo & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi & Gao, Weijun & Wu, Qiong, 2010. "Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3642-3651, December.
    8. Alarcon-Rodriguez, Arturo & Ault, Graham & Galloway, Stuart, 2010. "Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1353-1366, June.
    9. Masseran, Nurulkamal, 2015. "Evaluating wind power density models and their statistical properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 533-541.
    10. Aman, M.M. & Jasmon, G.B. & Bakar, A.H.A. & Mokhlis, H., 2014. "A new approach for optimum simultaneous multi-DG distributed generation Units placement and sizing based on maximization of system loadability using HPSO (hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 202-215.
    11. Enrico Zio, 2013. "System Reliability and Risk Analysis," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 7-17, Springer.
    12. Allan, Grant & Eromenko, Igor & Gilmartin, Michelle & Kockar, Ivana & McGregor, Peter, 2015. "The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 543-556.
    13. Wu, Jung-Hua & Huang, Yun-Hsun, 2014. "Electricity portfolio planning model incorporating renewable energy characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 278-287.
    14. Enrico Zio, 2013. "Monte Carlo Simulation: The Method," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 19-58, Springer.
    15. Tan, Wen-Shan & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Majid, Md Shah & Abdul Rahman, Hasimah, 2013. "Optimal distributed renewable generation planning: A review of different approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 626-645.
    16. Lin, Shin-Yeu & Lin, Ai-Chih, 2014. "RLOPF (risk-limiting optimal power flow) for systems with high penetration of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 49-61.
    17. Enrico Zio, 2013. "The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4471-4588-2, March.
    18. Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "A multi-state model for the reliability assessment of a distributed generation system via universal generating function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 28-36.
    19. Calvillo, C.F. & Sánchez-Miralles, A. & Villar, J., 2015. "Assessing low voltage network constraints in distributed energy resources planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 783-793.
    20. Borges, Carmen Lucia Tancredo, 2012. "An overview of reliability models and methods for distribution systems with renewable energy distributed generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4008-4015.
    21. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    22. Doagou-Mojarrad, Hasan & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Rastegar, H. & Olamaei, Javad, 2013. "Optimal placement and sizing of DG (distributed generation) units in distribution networks by novel hybrid evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 129-138.
    23. Enrico Zio, 2013. "System Reliability and Risk Analysis by Monte Carlo Simulation," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 59-81, Springer.
    24. Sedighizadeh, Mostafa & Esmaili, Masoud & Esmaeili, Mobin, 2014. "Application of the hybrid Big Bang-Big Crunch algorithm to optimal reconfiguration and distributed generation power allocation in distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 920-930.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 602-615.
    2. Zeinolabedin Sadeghi & Yahya Hatami & Seyed Abdolmajid Jalaei & Amir Abdollahi, 2020. "Generation capacity expansion economic-environmental planning under uncertainty of demand and supply," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 544-559, December.
    3. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    4. Sun, Lingling & Qiu, Jing & Han, Xiao & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2021. "Energy sharing platform based on call auction method with the maximum transaction volume," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Rocchetta, Roberto & Zio, Enrico & Patelli, Edoardo, 2018. "A power-flow emulator approach for resilience assessment of repairable power grids subject to weather-induced failures and data deficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 339-350.
    6. Ji, Ling & Huang, Guohe & Xie, Yulei & Zhou, Yong & Zhou, Jifang, 2018. "Robust cost-risk tradeoff for day-ahead schedule optimization in residential microgrid system under worst-case conditional value-at-risk consideration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 324-337.
    7. Wang, Wei & Cova, Gregorio & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A clustering-based framework for searching vulnerabilities in the operation dynamics of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Vinel, Alexander & Mortaz, Ebrahim, 2019. "Optimal pooling of renewable energy sources with a risk-averse approach: Implications for US energy portfolio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 928-939.
    9. Zhang, X.Y. & Huang, G.H. & Zhu, H. & Li, Y.P., 2017. "A fuzzy-stochastic power system planning model: Reflection of dual objectives and dual uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 664-676.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mo, Hua-Dong & Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "A system-of-systems framework for the reliability analysis of distributed generation systems accounting for the impact of degraded communication networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 805-822.
    2. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    3. Ferdinando Chiacchio & Fabio Famoso & Diego D’Urso & Sebastian Brusca & Jose Ignacio Aizpurua & Luca Cedola, 2018. "Dynamic Performance Evaluation of Photovoltaic Power Plant by Stochastic Hybrid Fault Tree Automaton Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Mena, Rodrigo & Hennebel, Martin & Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2014. "Self-adaptable hierarchical clustering analysis and differential evolution for optimal integration of renewable distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 388-402.
    5. Compare, M. & Martini, F. & Zio, E., 2015. "Genetic algorithms for condition-based maintenance optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 611-623.
    6. Rezaee Jordehi, Ahmad, 2016. "Allocation of distributed generation units in electric power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 893-905.
    7. Michele Compare & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio & Fausto Carlevaro & Sara Mattafirri, 2016. "Improving scheduled maintenance by missing data reconstruction: A double-loop Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(5), pages 502-511, October.
    8. Di Maio, Francesco & Pettorossi, Chiara & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Entropy-driven Monte Carlo simulation method for approximating the survival signature of complex infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Wang, Fan & Li, Heng, 2018. "System reliability under prescribed marginals and correlations: Are we correct about the effect of correlations?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 94-104.
    10. Tito G. Amaral & Vitor Fernão Pires & Armando Cordeiro & Daniel Foito & João F. Martins & Julia Yamnenko & Tetyana Tereschenko & Liudmyla Laikova & Ihor Fedin, 2023. "Incipient Fault Diagnosis of a Grid-Connected T-Type Multilevel Inverter Using Multilayer Perceptron and Walsh Transform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Penttinen, Jussi-Pekka & Niemi, Arto & Gutleber, Johannes & Koskinen, Kari T. & Coatanéa, Eric & Laitinen, Jouko, 2019. "An open modelling approach for availability and reliability of systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 387-399.
    12. Rocco, Claudio M. & Moronta, José & Ramirez-Marquez, José E. & Barker, Kash, 2017. "Effects of multi-state links in network community detection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 46-56.
    13. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.
    14. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Reliability model of a component equipped with PHM capabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 4-11.
    15. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    16. Shiyu Chen & Wei Wang & Enrico Zio, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for the Production Planning in Energy Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, May.
    17. Kim, Hyeonmin & Kim, Jung Taek & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2018. "Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 225-233.
    18. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    19. Cadini, F. & Gioletta, A., 2016. "A Bayesian Monte Carlo-based algorithm for the estimation of small failure probabilities of systems affected by uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 15-27.
    20. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Advanced RESTART method for the estimation of the probability of failure of highly reliable hybrid dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 117-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:106:y:2016:i:c:p:712-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.