IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v138y2024ics0140988324005826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the costs of rigidity? A general equilibrium study of the fuel market in Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Mercatante, Juan Ignacio

Abstract

The policy that is most widely applied to the biofuel market in the world is the mandatory blend. This policy aims to induce the use of biofuels by setting a minimum level of biofuel per unit of blended fuel. This paper studies the costs and benefits of such a policy. To do so, a Recursive Computable General Equilibrium model (CGE), calibrated with a new own-developed energy-oriented Social Accounting Matrix of Argentina for 2018, has been developed. Such a model is extended by explicitly embedding a constrained fuel blending model into the CGE setup. This research addresses the following questions: What are the costs and benefits of a mandatory blend compared to a full flexibility scenario? Is it better to induce the use of biofuels through a tax on fossil fuels or a blending constraint? What is the impact of international price shocks when considering different blending regimes? This paper finds that the mandatory policy has a negative impact on the economic activity, poverty, income distribution, and energy affordability, but a positive one on emissions. When analysing the convenience of a special tax on fossil fuels instead of a mandatory regime, this paper finds that the cost and benefits of each policy are distributed differently over time. The special tax on fossil fuels performs better in the short run while the mandatory blend does so in the long run. Finally, this paper finds that flexibility in the fuel market improves the country's performance when there are shocks on international prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercatante, Juan Ignacio, 2024. "What are the costs of rigidity? A general equilibrium study of the fuel market in Argentina," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005826
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324005826
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorbecke, Willem, 2019. "How oil prices affect East and Southeast Asian economies: Evidence from financial markets and implications for energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 628-638.
    2. Guo, Jin & Tanaka, Tetsuji, 2022. "Energy security versus food security: An analysis of fuel ethanol- related markets using the spillover index and partial wavelet coherence approaches," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Tourinho, Octavio A.F. & Kume, Honorio & Pedroso, Ana Cristina de Souza, 2010. "Armington elasticities for Brazil," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2591, September.
    4. La Rovere, Emilio Lèbre & Pereira, André Santos & Simões, André Felipe, 2011. "Biofuels and Sustainable Energy Development in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1026-1036, June.
    5. Harry de Gorter & David R. Just, 2010. "The Social Costs and Benefits of Biofuels: The Intersection of Environmental, Energy and Agricultural Policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 4-32.
    6. Arndt, Channing & Pauw, Karl & Thurlow, James, 2012. "Biofuels and economic development: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Tanzania," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1922-1930.
    7. Doumax, Virginie & Philip, Jean-Marc & Sarasa, Cristina, 2014. "Biofuels, tax policies and oil prices in France: Insights from a dynamic CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 603-614.
    8. Kretschmer, Bettina & Peterson, Sonja, 2010. "Integrating bioenergy into computable general equilibrium models -- A survey," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 673-686, May.
    9. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Ferran Sancho, 2018. "On the need to compensate the compensating variation in CGE modeling," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 313-322, July.
    10. Govinda Timilsina & Simon Mevel, 2013. "Biofuels and Climate Change Mitigation: A CGE Analysis Incorporating Land-Use Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 55(1), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Korrakot Phomsoda & Nattapong Puttanapong & Mongkut Piantanakulchai, 2021. "Economic Impacts of Thailand’s Biofuel Subsidy Reallocation Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Castiblanco, Carmenza & Moreno, Alvaro & Etter, Andrés, 2015. "Impact of policies and subsidies in agribusiness: The case of oil palm and biofuels in Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 676-686.
    13. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Chisari, Omar O. & Romero, Carlos A., 2013. "Economy-wide impacts of biofuels in Argentina," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 636-647.
    14. Gelos, Gaston & Ustyugova, Yulia, 2017. "Inflation responses to commodity price shocks – How and why do countries differ?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 28-47.
    15. Serra, Teresa & Zilberman, David, 2013. "Biofuel-related price transmission literature: A review," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 141-151.
    16. Emilio Lebre La Rovere & Andre Santos Pereira & Andre Felipe Simoes, 2011. "Biofuels and Sustainable Energy Development in Brazil," Post-Print hal-00715546, HAL.
    17. Cheng, Natalie Fang Ling & Hasanov, Akram Shavkatovich & Poon, Wai Ching & Bouri, Elie, 2023. "The US-China trade war and the volatility linkages between energy and agricultural commodities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Donald B. Marron & Eric J. Toder, 2014. "Tax Policy Issues in Designing a Carbon Tax," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 563-568, May.
    19. Wianwiwat, Suthin & Asafu-Adjaye, John, 2013. "Is there a role for biofuels in promoting energy self sufficiency and security? A CGE analysis of biofuel policy in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 543-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doumax-Tagliavini, Virginie & Sarasa, Cristina, 2018. "Looking towards policies supporting biofuels and technological change: Evidence from France," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 430-439.
    2. Tanaka, Tetsuji & Guo, Jin & Wang, Xiufang, 2024. "Understanding the spillover effects of ethanol production and energy prices on African food markets: A time-varying approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Qu, Yang & Swales, J. Kim & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Wang, Xinhao & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Economic trade-offs in marine resource use between offshore wind farms and fisheries in Scottish waters," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Elizondo, Alejandra & Boyd, Roy, 2017. "Economic impact of ethanol promotion in Mexico: A general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 293-301.
    5. Kaenchan, Piyanon & Puttanapong, Nattapong & Bowonthumrongchai, Thongchart & Limskul, Kitti & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2019. "Macroeconomic modeling for assessing sustainability of bioethanol production in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 361-373.
    6. Argueyrolles, Robin & Delzeit, Ruth, 2022. "The interconnections between Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms and biofuels," Conference papers 333492, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Bastianin, Andrea & Galeotti, Marzio & Manera, Matteo, 2014. "Causality and predictability in distribution: The ethanol–food price relation revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 152-160.
    8. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. da Silveira, Rodrigo Lanna F. & Mattos, Fabio L., 2015. "Price And Volatility Transmission In Livestock And Grain Markets: Examining The Effect Of Increasing Ethanol Production Across Countries," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205684, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Drabik, Dušan & Ciaian, Pavel & Pokrivčák, Ján, 2016. "The effect of ethanol policies on the vertical price transmission in corn and food markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 189-199.
    11. Dodder, Rebecca S. & Kaplan, P. Ozge & Elobeid, Amani & Tokgoz, Simla & Secchi, Silvia & Kurkalova, Lyubov A., 2015. "Impact of energy prices and cellulosic biomass supply on agriculture, energy, and the environment: An integrated modeling approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 77-87.
    12. Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti & Valquiria Aragão-Leoneti & Simone Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina & Geciane Silveira Porto, 2017. "The methylic versus the ethylic route: considerations about the sustainability of Brazilian biodiesel production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 637-651, April.
    13. Thomas Schinko & Birgit Bednar-Friedl & Barbara Truger & Rafael Bramreiter & Nadejda Komendantova & Michael Hartner, 2020. "Economy-wide benefits and costs of local-level energy transition in Austrian Climate and Energy Model Regions," Graz Economics Papers 2020-05, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    14. Gabisa, Elias W. & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2020. "Can substitution of imported gasoline by locally produced molasses ethanol in Ethiopia be sustainable? An eco-efficiency assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Moschini, GianCarlo & Cui, Jingbo & Lapan, Harvey E., 2012. "Economics of Biofuels: An Overview of Policies, Impacts and Prospects," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 1(3), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Kirsten Halsnæs & Amit Garg & John Christensen & Helene Føyn & Maryna Karavai & Emilio Rovere & Matthew Bramley & Xianli Zhu & Catherine Mitchell & Joyashree Roy & Kanako Tanaka & Hidefumi Katayama & , 2014. "Climate change mitigation policy paradigms—national objectives and alignments," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 45-71, January.
    17. Dias de Oliveira, Marcelo Eduardo & Moraes, Sergio Oliveira, 2017. "Modeling approaches for agricultural N2O fluxes from large scale areas: A case for sugarcane crops in the state of São Paulo - Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Anan Wattanakuljarus, 2019. "Effects and burdens of a carbon tax scheme in Thailand," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 173-219, June.
    19. Reymond, Mathias, 2012. "Measuring vulnerability to shocks in the gas market in South America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 754-761.
    20. De Oliveira, Fernando C. & Lopes, Thiago S.A. & Parente, Virginia & Bermann, Celio & Coelho, Suani T., 2019. "The Brazilian social fuel stamp program: Few strikes, many bloopers and stumbles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 121-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.