IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v321y2025i1p23-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surgery scheduling in flexible operating rooms by using a convex surrogate model of second-stage costs

Author

Listed:
  • Majthoub Almoghrabi, Mohammed
  • Sagnol, Guillaume

Abstract

We study the elective surgery planning problem in a hospital with operating rooms shared by elective and emergency patients. This problem is split in two distinct phases. First, a subset of patients to be operated in the next planning period is selected and the selected patients are assigned to a block and a tentative starting time. Then, in the online phase of the problem, a policy decides how to insert the emergency patients in the schedule and may cancel planned surgeries. The overall goal is to minimize the expectation of a cost function representing the assignment of patient to blocks, case cancellations, overtime, waiting time and idle time. We model the offline problem by a two-stage stochastic program, and show that the optimal second-stage costs can be approximated by a convex piecewise linear surrogate model that can be computed in a preprocessing step. This results in a mixed integer program which can be solved very fast, even for large instances of the problem. We also describe a greedy policy for the online phase of the problem, and analyze the performance of our approach by comparing it to both heuristic methods or approaches relying on sampling average approximation (SAA) on a large set of benchmarking instances. Our simulations indicate that our approach can reduce the expected costs by as much as 30% compared to heuristic methods and it can solve problems with 1000 patients in about one minute, while SAA-approaches fail to obtain good solutions within 30 min on small instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Majthoub Almoghrabi, Mohammed & Sagnol, Guillaume, 2025. "Surgery scheduling in flexible operating rooms by using a convex surrogate model of second-stage costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(1), pages 23-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:1:p:23-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724005952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:1:p:23-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.