IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v305y2023i2p562-593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic stability analysis of particle swarm optimization with pseudo random number assignment strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Chih, Mingchang

Abstract

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a population-based optimization method and has been successfully applied to solve many real-world problems. This method belongs to the stochastic optimization method and is mainly driven by two random streams utilized in the stochastic search mechanism, namely, individual (cognition) and social randomness effects. To our best knowledge, no research work has been conducted about the manipulation of the random stream assignment for stochastic search mechanism in the PSO algorithm. In this work, the influences of controlling randomness in the searching scheme of PSO is studied by introducing different pseudo random number (PRN) assignment strategies. The order-1 and order-2 stability analyses for particle dynamics under different PRN assignment strategies are also conducted to understand the influences. Stability analysis is carried out using the stochastic process theory. Our results show that the correlation caused by PRN has no effect on the unbiasedness of the expectation of particle position, but it would reduce or increase the variance of particle dynamics. Second, the convergent conditions of the PSO system under different PRN assignment strategies and the corresponding parameter selection ranges are provided. Finally, an empirical analysis via experimental simulations evaluated by six common swarm diversity measures, eight benchmark test functions, and two parameter tuples is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih, Mingchang, 2023. "Stochastic stability analysis of particle swarm optimization with pseudo random number assignment strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 562-593.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:305:y:2023:i:2:p:562-593
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722004829
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neungmatcha, Woraya, 2016. "Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for mechanical harvester route planning of sugarcane field operationsAuthor-Name: Sethanan, Kanchana," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 969-984.
    2. Natasha Stout & Sue Goldie, 2008. "Keeping the noise down: common random numbers for disease simulation modeling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 399-406, December.
    3. Xu, Gang & Luo, Kun & Jing, Guoxiu & Yu, Xiang & Ruan, Xiaojun & Song, Jun, 2020. "On convergence analysis of multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 32-38.
    4. Weidong Chen & Pengfei Zhai & Heng Zhu & Yongbo Zhang, 2014. "Hybrid algorithm for the two-dimensional rectangular layer-packing problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(7), pages 1068-1077, July.
    5. M Chih, 2013. "A more accurate second-order polynomial metamodel using a pseudo-random number assignment strategy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(2), pages 198-207, February.
    6. Paul Glasserman & David D. Yao, 1992. "Some Guidelines and Guarantees for Common Random Numbers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 884-908, June.
    7. Crawford, J. W. & Gallwey, T. J., 2000. "Bias and variance reduction in computer simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 571-590, August.
    8. Noorani, Idin & Mehrdoust, Farshid & Nasroallah, Abdelaziz, 2021. "A generalized antithetic variates Monte-Carlo simulation method for pricing of Asian option in a Markov regime-switching model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Marinakis, Yannis & Migdalas, Athanasios & Sifaleras, Angelo, 2017. "A hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization – Variable Neighborhood Search algorithm for Constrained Shortest Path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 819-834.
    10. Reuven Y. Rubinstein & Gennady Samorodnitsky & Moshe Shaked, 1985. "Antithetic Variates, Multivariate Dependence and Simulation of Stochastic Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 66-77, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2021. "A non-linear systematic grey model for forecasting the industrial economy-energy-environment system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Chun-Hung Chen & Xiaoping Xiong, 2007. "Simulation Allocation for Determining the Best Design in the Presence of Correlated Sampling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 101-111, February.
    3. N. Hilber & N. Reich & C. Schwab & C. Winter, 2009. "Numerical methods for Lévy processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 471-500, September.
    4. Mehrdoust, Farshid & Noorani, Idin & Hamdi, Abdelouahed, 2023. "Two-factor Heston model equipped with regime-switching: American option pricing and model calibration by Levenberg–Marquardt optimization algorithm," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 660-678.
    5. E Saliby & R J Paul, 2009. "A farewell to the use of antithetic variates in Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(7), pages 1026-1035, July.
    6. Fernández-Ponce, J.M. & Pellerey, F. & Rodríguez-Griñolo, M.R., 2011. "A characterization of the multivariate excess wealth ordering," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 410-417.
    7. Pinar, Mehmet & Stengos, Thanasis & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "On the construction of a feasible range of multidimensional poverty under benchmark weight uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 415-427.
    8. González-Parra, Gilberto & Villanueva-Oller, Javier & Navarro-González, F.J. & Ceberio, Josu & Luebben, Giulia, 2024. "A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Nathan L. Kleinman & James C. Spall & Daniel Q. Naiman, 1999. "Simulation-Based Optimization with Stochastic Approximation Using Common Random Numbers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1570-1578, November.
    10. Belzunce, Félix & Ruiz, José M. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2008. "On multivariate dispersion orderings based on the standard construction," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 271-281, February.
    11. Martin Filip & Tomas Zoubek & Roman Bumbalek & Pavel Cerny & Carlos E. Batista & Pavel Olsan & Petr Bartos & Pavel Kriz & Maohua Xiao & Antonin Dolan & Pavol Findura, 2020. "Advanced Computational Methods for Agriculture Machinery Movement Optimization with Applications in Sugarcane Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Guillaume Bernis & Emmanuel Gobet & Arturo Kohatsu‐Higa, 2003. "Monte Carlo Evaluation of Greeks for Multidimensional Barrier and Lookback Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 99-113, January.
    13. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    14. repec:ijm:journl:v109:y:2017:i:1:p:167-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Phillip M LaCasse & Lance E Champagne & Jonathan M Escamilla, 2024. "Simulation analysis of applicant scheduling and processing alternatives at a military entrance processing station," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(2), pages 229-243, April.
    16. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini, 2001. "Stochastic Comparison of Random Vectors with a Common Copula," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 723-740, November.
    17. Benhamou, Eric, 2000. "A generalisation of Malliavin weighted scheme for fast computation of the Greeks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119105, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Eric Benhamou, 2000. "A Generalisation of Malliavin Weighted Scheme for Fast Computation of the Greeks," FMG Discussion Papers dp350, Financial Markets Group.
    19. Shuowen Chen, 2022. "Indirect Inference for Nonlinear Panel Models with Fixed Effects," Papers 2203.10683, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    20. Buu-Chau Truong & Kim-Hung Pho & Van-Buol Nguyen & Bui Anh Tuan & Wing-Keung Wong, 2019. "Graph Theory And Environmental Algorithmic Solutions To Assign Vehicles Application To Garbage Collection In Vietnam," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 23(3), pages 1-35, September.
    21. Lixing Liu & Xu Wang & Hongjie Liu & Jianping Li & Pengfei Wang & Xin Yang, 2024. "A Full-Coverage Path Planning Method for an Orchard Mower Based on the Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:305:y:2023:i:2:p:562-593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.