IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v261y2017i3p1001-1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic negotiation mechanisms with side payments – Design, analysis and application for decentralized resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problems

Author

Listed:
  • Homberger, Jörg
  • Fink, Andreas

Abstract

Negotiation mechanisms have been proven useful for decentralized resource-constrained multi-project scheduling with self-interested parties (agents) that work together in completing a project. The current paper is concerned with such kinds of multi-agent problems, where each involved party pursues the individual goal of maximizing the discounted cash flow that is connected to its own project activities. Since the parties assess schedules and proposed changes to solutions in terms of money, it is appropriate to utilize money transfers (side payments). We design and analyze different automated negotiation procedures with side payments for resolving conflicts of interest between two agents and experimentally compare results with negotiation mechanisms without the use of money transfers. In principle, we consider two generic negotiation approaches: firstly, an agent may offer tentative payments in order to incentivize the other agent to accept changes to the project schedule within iterative improvement-based negotiation processes; secondly, agents offer or claim money for selecting the final solution from an approximate set of Pareto-optimal solutions that have been generated by a preceding search process. Taking account of self-interested agents and private preference information we discuss suitable elements of the mechanism with regard to strategic agent behavior. We provide insights regarding the effectiveness of different behavioral choices and analyze reasonable strategies of the agents from a prescriptive perspective. Overall, the proposed solution mechanism improves existing results from the literature for the considered kind of problem. Since the approach is built on general concepts, it may be also useful for other applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Homberger, Jörg & Fink, Andreas, 2017. "Generic negotiation mechanisms with side payments – Design, analysis and application for decentralized resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1001-1012.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:261:y:2017:i:3:p:1001-1012
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717302266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Russell, 1986. "A Comparison of Heuristics for Scheduling Projects with Cash Flows and Resource Restrictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1291-1300, October.
    2. Nisan,Noam & Roughgarden,Tim & Tardos,Eva & Vazirani,Vijay V. (ed.), 2007. "Algorithmic Game Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872829, October.
    3. Guoming Lai & Katia Sycara, 2009. "A Generic Framework for Automated Multi-attribute Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 169-187, March.
    4. Dudek, Gregor & Stadtler, Hartmut, 2005. "Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 668-687, June.
    5. Harri Ehtamo & Raimo P. Hämäläinen, 2001. "Interactive Multiple‐Criteria Methods for Reaching Pareto Optimal Agreements in Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 475-491, November.
    6. Gregory E. Kersten & Hsiangchu Lai, 2007. "Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems: An Overview," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 553-586, November.
    7. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    8. Guoming Lai & Cuihong Li & Katia Sycara, 2006. "Efficient Multi-Attribute Negotiation with Incomplete Information," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 511-528, September.
    9. Mark Klein & Peyman Faratin & Hiroki Sayama & Yaneer Bar-Yam, 2003. "Negotiating Complex Contracts," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 111-125, March.
    10. Hanyu Gu & Andreas Schutt & Peter J. Stuckey & Mark G. Wallace & Geoffrey Chu, 2015. "Exact and Heuristic Methods for the Resource-Constrained Net Present Value Problem," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Christoph Schwindt & Jürgen Zimmermann (ed.), Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol.1, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 299-318, Springer.
    11. N.R. Jennings & P. Faratin & A.R. Lomuscio & S. Parsons & M.J. Wooldridge & C. Sierra, 2001. "Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 199-215, March.
    12. Andreas Fink & Jörg Homberger, 2015. "Decentralized Multi-Project Scheduling," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Christoph Schwindt & Jürgen Zimmermann (ed.), Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 685-706, Springer.
    13. A. Kimms, 2001. "Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Resource Constraints Using a Lagrangian Relaxation Based Heuristic with Tight Upper Bounds," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 221-236, February.
    14. Lang, Fabian & Fink, Andreas & Brandt, Tobias, 2016. "Design of automated negotiation mechanisms for decentralized heterogeneous machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 192-203.
    15. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    16. Oya Icmeli & S. Selcuk Erenguc, 1996. "A Branch and Bound Procedure for the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(10), pages 1395-1408, October.
    17. Mario Vanhoucke & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2001. "On Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1113-1121, August.
    18. Kolisch, Rainer & Hartmann, Sonke, 2006. "Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 23-37, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinmin Zhou & Wenhao Rao & Yaqiong Liu & Shudong Sun, 2024. "A Decentralized Optimization Algorithm for Multi-Agent Job Shop Scheduling with Private Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    3. He, Yukang & Jia, Tao & Zheng, Weibo, 2023. "Tabu search for dedicated resource-constrained multiproject scheduling to minimise the maximal cash flow gap under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 34-52.
    4. Fink, Andreas & Gerhards, Patrick, 2021. "Negotiation mechanisms for the multi-agent multi-mode resource investment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 261-274.
    5. Wuliang Peng & Jiali lin & Jingwen Zhang & Liangwei Chen, 2022. "A bi-objective hierarchical program scheduling problem and its solution based on NSGA-III," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 389-414, January.
    6. Gudmundsson, Jens & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Platz, Trine Tornøe, 2023. "Decentralized task coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 851-864.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mika, Marek & Waligora, Grzegorz & Weglarz, Jan, 2005. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 639-668, August.
    2. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    5. Rudolf Vetschera & Michael Filzmoser & Ronald Mitterhofer, 2014. "An Analytical Approach to Offer Generation in Concession-Based Negotiation Processes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 71-99, January.
    6. Nursel Kavlak & Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu & Ş. İlker Birbil, 2009. "Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 93-112, March.
    7. Thomas Selle & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2003. "A bidirectional heuristic for maximizing the net present value of large‐scale projects subject to limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 130-148, March.
    8. Wenhui Zhao & Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 428-446, February.
    9. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    10. Jorge E. Hernández & Josefa Mula & Raúl Poler & Andrew C. Lyons, 2014. "Collaborative Planning in Multi-tier Supply Chains Supported by a Negotiation-Based Mechanism and Multi-agent System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 235-269, March.
    11. Lang, Fabian & Fink, Andreas & Brandt, Tobias, 2016. "Design of automated negotiation mechanisms for decentralized heterogeneous machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 192-203.
    12. Fabian Lang & Andreas Fink, 2015. "Learning from the Metaheuristics: Protocols for Automated Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 299-332, March.
    13. Kimms, Alf, 1999. "Lagrangean relaxation for scheduling projects under resource constraints to maximize the net present value," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 504, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    14. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    15. Fink, Andreas & Gerhards, Patrick, 2021. "Negotiation mechanisms for the multi-agent multi-mode resource investment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 261-274.
    16. Zhang, Linlan & Song, Haigang & Chen, Xueguang & Hong, Liu, 2011. "A simultaneous multi-issue negotiation through autonomous agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 95-105, April.
    17. He, Zhengwen & Xu, Yu, 2008. "Multi-mode project payment scheduling problems with bonus-penalty structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1191-1207, September.
    18. Ivan Marsa-Maestre & Miguel A. Lopez-Carmona & Juan A. Carral & Guillermo Ibanez, 2013. "A Recursive Protocol for Negotiating Contracts Under Non-monotonic Preference Structures," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-43, January.
    19. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    20. Huan Neng Chiu & Deng Maw Tsai, 2002. "An efficient search procedure for the resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 55-66.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:261:y:2017:i:3:p:1001-1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.