IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v164y2005i3p639-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models

Author

Listed:
  • Mika, Marek
  • Waligora, Grzegorz
  • Weglarz, Jan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mika, Marek & Waligora, Grzegorz & Weglarz, Jan, 2005. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 639-668, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:164:y:2005:i:3:p:639-668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(04)00113-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Kolisch & Arno Sprecher & Andreas Drexl, 1995. "Characterization and Generation of a General Class of Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    2. Neumann, K. & Zimmermann, J., 2000. "Procedures for resource leveling and net present value problems in project scheduling with general temporal and resource constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 425-443, December.
    3. A. H. Russell, 1970. "Cash Flows in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 357-373, January.
    4. Robert A. Russell, 1986. "A Comparison of Heuristics for Scheduling Projects with Cash Flows and Resource Restrictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1291-1300, October.
    5. Robert H. Doersch & James H. Patterson, 1977. "Scheduling a Project to Maximize Its Present Value: A Zero-One Programming Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(8), pages 882-889, April.
    6. Fred Glover, 1989. "Tabu Search---Part I," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 190-206, August.
    7. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    8. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    9. Herroelen, Willy S. & Gallens, Els, 1993. "Computational experience with an optimal procedure for the scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 274-277, March.
    10. Elmaghraby, Salah E. & Herroelen, Willy S., 1990. "The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 35-49, November.
    11. Nalini Dayanand & Rema Padman, 2001. "A Two Stage Search Heuristic for Scheduling Payments in Projects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 197-220, February.
    12. Sepil, Canan, 1994. "Comment on elmaghraby and herroelen's "The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects"," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 185-187, February.
    13. Padman, Rema & Smith-Daniels, Dwight E., 1993. "Early-tardy cost trade-offs in resource constrained projects with cash flows: An optimization-guided heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 295-311, January.
    14. A. Kimms, 2001. "Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Resource Constraints Using a Lagrangian Relaxation Based Heuristic with Tight Upper Bounds," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 221-236, February.
    15. Etgar, Ran & Shtub, Avraham & LeBlanc, Larry J., 1997. "Scheduling projects to maximize net present value -- the case of time-dependent, contingent cash flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 90-96, January.
    16. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    17. Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya-Şerifoğlu & Şule Şahin, 2001. "Four Payment Models for the Multi-Mode Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 237-261, February.
    18. Elmaghraby, Salah E., 1995. "Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 383-408, May.
    19. Christoph Schwindt & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2001. "A steepest ascent approach to maximizing the net present value of projects," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 53(3), pages 435-450, July.
    20. Oya Icmeli & S. Selcuk Erenguc, 1996. "A Branch and Bound Procedure for the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(10), pages 1395-1408, October.
    21. De Reyck, Bert & Herroelen, willy, 1998. "A branch-and-bound procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 152-174, November.
    22. Ulusoy, Gunduz & Cebelli, Serkan, 2000. "An equitable approach to the payment scheduling problem in project management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 262-278, December.
    23. Mario Vanhoucke & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2001. "On Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1113-1121, August.
    24. Sung, C. S. & Lim, S. K., 1994. "A project activity scheduling problem with net present value measure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 177-187, December.
    25. Yang, Kum Khiong & Talbot, F. Brian & Patterson, James H., 1993. "Scheduling a project to maximize its net present value: An integer programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 188-198, January.
    26. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1997. "PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library : OR Software - ORSEP Operations Research Software Exchange Program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 205-216, January.
    27. Yang, Kum Khiong & Tay, Lee Choo & Sum, Chee Chuong, 1995. "A comparison of stochastic scheduling rules for maximizing project net present value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 327-339, September.
    28. Jadranka Skorin-Kapov, 1990. "Tabu Search Applied to the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 33-45, February.
    29. James H. Patterson, 1984. "A Comparison of Exact Approaches for Solving the Multiple Constrained Resource, Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(7), pages 854-867, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Etgar, Ran & Gelbard, Roy & Cohen, Yuval, 2017. "Optimizing version release dates of research and development long-term processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 642-653.
    2. Grzegorz Waligóra, 2014. "Discrete-continuous project scheduling with discounted cash inflows and various payment models—a review of recent results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 319-340, February.
    3. Buddhakulsomsiri, Jirachai & Kim, David S., 2007. "Priority rule-based heuristic for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems with resource vacations and activity splitting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 374-390, April.
    4. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    5. Hamid R. Yoosefzadeh & Hamed R. Tareghian & Mohammad H. Farahi, 2014. "Multidirectional scheduling scheme in resource‐constrained project schedulingproblem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 44-55, February.
    6. M. Vanhoucke, 2007. "A genetic algorithm to investigate the trade-off between project lead time and net present value," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/456, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Grzegorz Waligóra, 2016. "Comparative Analysis of Some Metaheuristics for Discrete-Continuous Project Scheduling with Activities of Identical Processing Rates," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(03), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Nima Zoraghi & Aria Shahsavar & Babak Abbasi & Vincent Peteghem, 2017. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with material ordering under bonus–penalty policies," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 49-79, April.
    9. Schlereth, Christian & Stepanchuk, Tanja & Skiera, Bernd, 2010. "Optimization and analysis of the profitability of tariff structures with two-part tariffs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 691-701, November.
    10. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    11. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Luis F. Machado-Domínguez & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Jorge I. Vélez & Agustín Barrios-Sarmiento, 2022. "An adaptative bacterial foraging optimization algorithm for solving the MRCPSP with discounted cash flows," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 221-248, July.
    13. He, Zhengwen & Liu, Renjing & Jia, Tao, 2012. "Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 605-613.
    14. He, Zhengwen & Xu, Yu, 2008. "Multi-mode project payment scheduling problems with bonus-penalty structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1191-1207, September.
    15. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    16. Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Pengxiang Li, 2014. "Simulated annealing for financing cost distribution based project payment scheduling from a joint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 203-220, February.
    17. Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yuri, 2005. "Multicriteria time window-constrained project scheduling with applications to airport gate assignment. Part I: Methodology," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 595, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    19. Aidin Delgoshaei & Timon Rabczuk & Ahad Ali & Mohd Khairol Anuar Ariffin, 2017. "An applicable method for modifying over-allocated multi-mode resource constraint schedules in the presence of preemptive resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 85-117, December.
    20. Colvin, Matthew & Maravelias, Christos T., 2011. "R&D pipeline management: Task interdependencies and risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 616-628, December.
    21. Nursel Kavlak & Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu & Ş. İlker Birbil, 2009. "Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 93-112, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    2. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    5. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    6. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    7. Nursel Kavlak & Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu & Ş. İlker Birbil, 2009. "Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 93-112, March.
    8. Thomas Selle & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2003. "A bidirectional heuristic for maximizing the net present value of large‐scale projects subject to limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 130-148, March.
    9. Vanhoucke, Mario & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2003. "Progress payments in project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 604-620, August.
    10. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    11. Mario Vanhoucke & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2001. "On Maximizing the Net Present Value of a Project Under Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1113-1121, August.
    12. He, Zhengwen & Liu, Renjing & Jia, Tao, 2012. "Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 605-613.
    13. M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "An efficient hybrid search algorithm for various optimization problems," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/365, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Pengxiang Li, 2014. "Simulated annealing for financing cost distribution based project payment scheduling from a joint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 203-220, February.
    15. Kimms, Alf, 1999. "Lagrangean relaxation for scheduling projects under resource constraints to maximize the net present value," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 504, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    16. Vanhoucke, M., 2006. "A scatter search procedure for maximizing the net present value of a project under renewable resource constraints," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-40, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    17. Wenhui Zhao & Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 428-446, February.
    18. He, Zhengwen & Xu, Yu, 2008. "Multi-mode project payment scheduling problems with bonus-penalty structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1191-1207, September.
    19. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    20. Leyman, Pieter & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2017. "Capital- and resource-constrained project scheduling with net present value optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 757-776.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:164:y:2005:i:3:p:639-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.