IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v219y2012i2p284-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel

Author

Listed:
  • Martín-Herrán, Guiomar
  • Taboubi, Sihem
  • Zaccour, Georges

Abstract

In this paper we study a dynamic two-player channel where the manufacturer controls the wholesale price and the investment in quality and the retailer chooses the retail price. We consider that the retail price affects both the demand and the perceived quality of the brand and that its variations contribute to the building of an internal reference price. One of the model’s distinctive features is that it accounts for the two meanings of price, i.e., its classical objective measure of the cost of acquiring a particular quantity of the product, and its subjective roles as an assessment of the quality of the product and an evaluation of gains or losses (deal vs. sacrifice) resulting from buying a “cheap” or an “expensive” product. This dual computation is done with respect to the internal reference price.

Suggested Citation

  • Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem & Zaccour, Georges, 2012. "Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 284-295.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:219:y:2012:i:2:p:284-295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711010927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.12.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Strategic Decentralization in Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 335-355.
    2. G. E. Fruchter, 2008. "Dual-Role Based Pricing in a Dynamic and Competitive Environment," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 27-44, July.
    3. Baohong Sun, 2005. "Promotion Effect on Endogenous Consumption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 430-443, July.
    4. Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane & Baohong Sun, 2008. "A Dynamic Model of Brand Choice When Price and Advertising Signal Product Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1111-1125, 11-12.
    5. Franziska Völckner & Julian Hofmann, 2007. "The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 181-196, September.
    6. Harold J. Leavitt, 1954. "A Note on Some Experimental Findings About the Meanings of Price," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27, pages 205-205.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Frank M. Bass & Alain V. Bultez, 1982. "Technical Note—A Note on Optimal Strategic Pricing of Technological Innovations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 371-378.
    9. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Vithala R. Rao, 1996. "Pricing Strategies in a Dynamic Duopoly: A Differential Game Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(11), pages 1501-1514, November.
    10. Gadi Fibich & Arieh Gavious & Oded Lowengart, 2003. "Explicit Solutions of Optimization Models and Differential Games with Nonsmooth (Asymmetric) Reference-Price Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 721-734, October.
    11. Benchekroun, Hassan & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem, 2009. "Could myopic pricing be a strategic choice in marketing channels? A game theoretic analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1699-1718, September.
    12. Ioana Popescu & Yaozhong Wu, 2007. "Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 413-429, June.
    13. Richard H. Thaler, 2008. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 15-25, 01-02.
    14. Bulow, Jeremy I & Geanakoplos, John D & Klemperer, Paul D, 1985. "Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(3), pages 488-511, June.
    15. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    16. Steffen Jørgensen & Georges Zaccour, 2007. "Developments in differential game theory and numerical methods: economic and management applications," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 159-181, April.
    17. Shlomo Kalish, 1983. "Monopolist Pricing with Dynamic Demand and Production Cost," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 135-159.
    18. Winer, Russell S, 1986. "A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 250-256, September.
    19. Eric A. Greenleaf, 1995. "The Impact of Reference Price Effects on the Profitability of Price Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 82-104.
    20. Erickson, Gary M & Johansson, Johny K, 1985. "The Role of Price in Multi-attribute Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 195-199, September.
    21. Daniel S. Putler, 1992. "Incorporating Reference Price Effects into a Theory of Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 287-309.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan Zhang & Susu Cheng, 2021. "Behavioral choices in a dynamic duopoly with process innovation and sticky price: Myopia versus farsightedness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 662-674, April.
    2. Deqing Ma & Xue Wang & Jinsong Hu, 2022. "Platform Selling Mode Selection Considering Consumer Reference Effect in Carbon Emission Reduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-43, December.
    3. Hu, Li & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Wang, Li & Liu, Yang, 2023. "Hiding or disclosing? Information discrimination in member-only discounts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "A survey of dynamic models of product quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 991-1007.
    5. Benchekroun, Hassan & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar, 2016. "The impact of foresight in a transboundary pollution game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 300-309.
    6. Buratto, Alessandra & Cesaretto, Rudy & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2019. "Consignment contracts with cooperative programs and price discount mechanisms in a dynamic supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 72-82.
    7. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem, 2015. "Price coordination in distribution channels: A dynamic perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 401-414.
    8. Jun Wang & Xianxue Cheng & Xinyu Wang & Hongtao Yang & Shuhua Zhang, 2019. "Myopic versus Farsighted Behaviors in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Reference Emission Effects," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, February.
    9. Gustav Feichtinger & Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort & Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek, 2022. "Asymmetric Information in a Capital Accumulation Differential Game with Spillover and Learning Effects," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 878-895, September.
    10. Haoyu Liu & Shulin Liu, 2020. "Research on Advertising and Quality of Paid Apps, Considering the Effects of Reference Price and Goodwill," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Marta Biancardi & Andrea Di Liddo & Giovanni Villani, 2022. "How do Fines and Their Enforcement on Counterfeit Products Affect Social Welfare?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1547-1573, December.
    12. Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek & Georges Zaccour, 2020. "Existence and characterization of optimal dynamic pricing strategies with reference-price effects," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 441-459, June.
    13. Katarzyna Kańska & Agnieszka Wiszniewska-Matyszkiel, 2022. "Dynamic Stackelberg duopoly with sticky prices and a myopic follower," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4221-4252, September.
    14. Yao, Fanjun & Parilina, Elena & Zaccour, Georges & Gao, Hongwei, 2022. "Accounting for consumers’ environmental concern in supply chain contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 987-1006.
    15. Fabien Ngendakuriyo & Sihem Taboubi, 2017. "Pricing Strategies of Complementary Products in Distribution Channels: A Dynamic Approach," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 48-66, March.
    16. Nicole Koschate-Fischer & Katharina Wüllner, 2017. "New developments in behavioral pricing research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(6), pages 809-875, August.
    17. Lu, Fuxiao & Tang, Wansheng & Liu, Guowei & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Cooperative advertising: A way escaping from the prisoner’s dilemma in a supply chain with sticky price," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 87-106.
    18. Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu & Weihao Wang, 2021. "Differential game of product–service supply chain considering consumers’ reference effect and supply chain members’ reciprocity altruism in the online-to-offline mode," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 263-297, September.
    19. Haoyu Liu & Shulin Liu, 2021. "Optimal decisions and coordination of live streaming selling under revenue‐sharing contracts," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1022-1036, June.
    20. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2021. "Dynamic oligopoly pricing with reference-price effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 1006-1016.
    21. Lihao Lu & Qinglong Gou & Wansheng Tang & Jianxiong Zhang, 2016. "Joint pricing and advertising strategy with reference price effect," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5250-5270, September.
    22. Crettez, Bertrand & Hayek, Naila & Zaccour, Georges, 2018. "Brand imitation: A dynamic-game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 139-155.
    23. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhang, Shichen & Liu, Guowei, 2017. "Prisoner’s dilemma on behavioral choices in the presence of sticky prices: Farsightedness vs. myopia," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 128-142.
    24. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Managing quality and pricing during a product recall: An analysis of pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 406-420.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2021. "Dynamic oligopoly pricing with reference-price effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 1006-1016.
    2. Zhang, Jie & Chiang, Wei-yu Kevin, 2020. "Durable goods pricing with reference price effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Yao, Fanjun & Parilina, Elena & Zaccour, Georges & Gao, Hongwei, 2022. "Accounting for consumers’ environmental concern in supply chain contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 987-1006.
    4. Zhang, Jie & Kevin Chiang, Wei–yu & Liang, Liang, 2014. "Strategic pricing with reference effects in a competitive supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 126-135.
    5. Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek & Georges Zaccour, 2020. "Existence and characterization of optimal dynamic pricing strategies with reference-price effects," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 441-459, June.
    6. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem, 2015. "Price coordination in distribution channels: A dynamic perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 401-414.
    7. Prakash, David & Spann, Martin, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and reference price effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 300-314.
    8. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    9. Dmitri Kuksov & Kangkang Wang, 2014. "The Bright Side of Loss Aversion in Dynamic and Competitive Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 693-711, September.
    10. Zhang, Juan & Gou, Qinglong & Liang, Liang & Huang, Zhimin, 2013. "Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 345-353.
    11. Nicole Koschate-Fischer & Katharina Wüllner, 2017. "New developments in behavioral pricing research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(6), pages 809-875, August.
    12. Benchekroun, Hassan & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem, 2009. "Could myopic pricing be a strategic choice in marketing channels? A game theoretic analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1699-1718, September.
    13. Fabien Ngendakuriyo & Sihem Taboubi, 2017. "Pricing Strategies of Complementary Products in Distribution Channels: A Dynamic Approach," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 48-66, March.
    14. Tülin Erdem & Michael Katz & Baohong Sun, 2010. "A simple test for distinguishing between internal reference price theories," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 303-332, September.
    15. Ioana Popescu & Yaozhong Wu, 2007. "Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 413-429, June.
    16. van Oest, Rutger, 2013. "Why are Consumers Less Loss Averse in Internal than External Reference Prices?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 62-71.
    17. Shirin Aslani & Soheil Sibdari & Mohammad Modarres, 2018. "Revenue Management with Customers’ Reference Price: Are the Existing Methods Effective?," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 195-214, June.
    18. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2014-065 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Zhenyu Hu & Javad Nasiry, 2018. "Are Markets with Loss-Averse Consumers More Sensitive to Losses?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1384-1395, March.
    20. Biondi, Beatrice & Cornelsen, Laura & Mazzocchi, Mario & Smith, Richard, 2020. "Between preferences and references: Asymmetric price elasticities and the simulation of fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 108-128.
    21. Arieh Gavious & Oded Lowengart, 2012. "Price–quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 137-161, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:219:y:2012:i:2:p:284-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.