IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v146y2003i1p35-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A probabilistic solution-generator for simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ozden, Mufit
  • Ho, Yu-Chi

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozden, Mufit & Ho, Yu-Chi, 2003. "A probabilistic solution-generator for simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 35-51, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:146:y:2003:i:1:p:35-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(02)00215-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mufit Ozden, 1994. "Intelligent Objects in Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 329-341, November.
    2. Russell R. Barton & John S. Ivey, Jr., 1996. "Nelder-Mead Simplex Modifications for Simulation Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(7), pages 954-973, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castillo, Ignacio & Joro, Tarja & Li, Yong Yue, 2009. "Workforce scheduling with multiple objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 162-170, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Liu & Y. H. Dai, 2001. "Minimization Algorithms Based on Supervisor and Searcher Cooperation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 359-379, November.
    2. Sudarshan Kumar & Tiziana Di Matteo & Anindya S. Chakrabarti, 2020. "Disentangling shock diffusion on complex networks: Identification through graph planarity," Papers 2001.01518, arXiv.org.
    3. David G. Humphrey & James R. Wilson, 2000. "A Revised Simplex Search Procedure for Stochastic Simulation Response Surface Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 272-283, November.
    4. Fan, Shu-Kai S. & Zahara, Erwie, 2007. "A hybrid simplex search and particle swarm optimization for unconstrained optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 527-548, September.
    5. Hachicha, Wafik & Ammeri, Ahmed & Masmoudi, Faouzi & Chachoub, Habib, 2010. "A comprehensive literature classification of simulation optimisation methods," MPRA Paper 27652, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Chang, Kuo-Hao, 2015. "A direct search method for unconstrained quantile-based simulation optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 487-495.
    7. Galip Altinay, 2003. "Estimating growth rate in the presence of serially correlated errors," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(15), pages 967-970.
    8. Chang, Kuo-Hao, 2012. "Stochastic Nelder–Mead simplex method – A new globally convergent direct search method for simulation optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 684-694.
    9. Kao, Chiang & Chen, Shih-Pin, 2006. "A stochastic quasi-Newton method for simulation response optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 30-46, August.
    10. M Laguna & J Molina & F Pérez & R Caballero & A G Hernández-Díaz, 2010. "The challenge of optimizing expensive black boxes: a scatter search/rough set theory approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 53-67, January.
    11. Arsham H., 1998. "Techniques for Monte Carlo Optimizing," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 181-230, December.
    12. Pinto, Roberto, 2016. "Stock rationing under a profit satisficing objective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-68.
    13. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    14. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    15. Rosen, Scott L. & Harmonosky, Catherine M. & Traband, Mark T., 2007. "A simulation optimization method that considers uncertainty and multiple performance measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 315-330, August.
    16. Alkhamis, Talal M. & Ahmed, Mohamed A., 2006. "A modified Hooke and Jeeves algorithm with likelihood ratio performance extrapolation for simulation optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1802-1815, November.
    17. Neddermeijer, H.G. & Piersma, N. & van Oortmarssen, G.J. & Habbema, J.D.F. & Dekker, R., 1999. "Comparison of response surface methodology and the Nelder and Mead simplex method for optimization in microsimulation models," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9924-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Kuo-Hao Chang & L. Jeff Hong & Hong Wan, 2013. "Stochastic Trust-Region Response-Surface Method (STRONG)---A New Response-Surface Framework for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 230-243, May.
    19. Cheung, Ka Chun & He, Wanting & Wang, He, 2023. "Multi-constrained optimal reinsurance model from the duality perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 199-214.
    20. Jeroen J. van den Broek & Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn & Eveline A. Heijnsdijk & Harry J. de Koning, 2018. "Simulating the Impact of Risk-Based Screening and Treatment on Breast Cancer Outcomes with MISCAN-Fadia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 54-65, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:146:y:2003:i:1:p:35-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.