IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v119y1999i2p373-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods

Author

Listed:
  • Gal, Tomas
  • Hanne, Thomas

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 1999. "Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 373-378, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:119:y:1999:i:2:p:373-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(99)00139-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Roy & Ph. Vincke, 1984. "Relational Systems of Preference with One or More Pseudo-Criteria: Some New Concepts and Results," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(11), pages 1323-1335, November.
    2. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1976. "An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 652-663, February.
    3. Gal, Tomas & Leberling, Heiner, 1977. "Redundant objective functions in linear vector maximum problems and their determination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 176-184, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lindroth, Peter & Patriksson, Michael & Strömberg, Ann-Brith, 2010. "Approximating the Pareto optimal set using a reduced set of objective functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1519-1534, December.
    2. Alexander Engau & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2008. "Interactive Coordination of Objective Decompositions in Multiobjective Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1350-1363, July.
    3. Stephan Dempe & Gabriele Eichfelder & Jörg Fliege, 2015. "On the effects of combining objectives in multi-objective optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 82(1), pages 1-18, August.
    4. A. B. Malinowska & D. F. M. Torres, 2008. "Computational Approach to Essential and Nonessential Objective Functions in Linear Multicriteria Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 577-590, December.
    5. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 2006. "Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 584-592, January.
    6. Boland, Natashia & Charkhgard, Hadi & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2019. "Preprocessing and cut generation techniques for multi-objective binary programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 858-875.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 2006. "Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 584-592, January.
    2. Charles, V. & Udhayakumar, A. & Rhymend Uthariaraj, V., 2010. "An approach to find redundant objective function(s) and redundant constraint(s) in multi-objective nonlinear stochastic fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 390-398, March.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    4. Li, Hui & Sun, Jie, 2009. "Hybridizing principles of the Electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: Electre-CBR-I and Electre-CBR-II," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 214-224, August.
    5. Torres-Rojo, J. M., 2001. "Risk management in the design of a feeding ration: a portfolio theory approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Buyukozkan, G.Gulcin & Feyzioglu, Orhan, 2004. "A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 27-45, July.
    7. A. B. Malinowska & D. F. M. Torres, 2008. "Computational Approach to Essential and Nonessential Objective Functions in Linear Multicriteria Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 577-590, December.
    8. Bottero, M. & Ferretti, V. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Roy, B., 2018. "On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 120-140.
    9. Nowak, Maciej, 2007. "Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1626-1640, March.
    10. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    11. Navindran Davendralingam & Daniel. A. DeLaurentis, 2015. "A Robust Portfolio Optimization Approach to System of System Architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 269-283, May.
    12. Roy, B. & Figueira, J.R. & Almeida-Dias, J., 2014. "Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 9-20.
    13. Andonegi, Aitor & Garmendia, Eneko & Aldezabal, Arantza, 2021. "Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.
    15. Alzorba, Shaghaf & Günther, Christian & Popovici, Nicolae & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A new algorithm for solving planar multiobjective location problems involving the Manhattan norm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 35-46.
    16. Lindroth, Peter & Patriksson, Michael & Strömberg, Ann-Brith, 2010. "Approximating the Pareto optimal set using a reduced set of objective functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1519-1534, December.
    17. Mousseau, Vincent & Figueira, Jose & Dias, Luis & Gomes da Silva, Carlos & Climaco, Joao, 2003. "Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 72-93, May.
    18. Nasim Nasrabadi & Akram Dehnokhalaji & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 2019. "Using convex preference cones in multiple criteria decision making and related fields," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(6), pages 699-717, August.
    19. G Özerol & E Karasakal, 2008. "Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problems with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    20. Murat Köksalan & Vincent Mousseau & Özgür Özpeynirci & Selin Bilgin Özpeynirci, 2009. "A new outranking‐based approach for assigning alternatives to ordered classes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 74-85, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:119:y:1999:i:2:p:373-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.