IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v8y2014icp178-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business and biodiversity: A frame analysis

Author

Listed:
  • van den Burg, S.W.K.
  • Bogaardt, M.J.

Abstract

It is often stated that business has a key role to play in the protection of biodiversity and ecosystems. Various instruments are developed that enable businesses to assess their impact and dependence on ecosystem services. Actual use of these instruments remains limited. This paper uses discourse analysis to explain that this discrepancy can be explained by diverging frames on the role of business. Documents from governments and civil society are analysed to identify how the role of business is framed. This is compared to the business perspective as identified through interviews. Results show that there is some shared ground as different actors use common economic terminology in framing the problem and causes for action. However, there are significant differences of opinion when it comes to the role business and government should play in the protection of biodiversity and ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • van den Burg, S.W.K. & Bogaardt, M.J., 2014. "Business and biodiversity: A frame analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 178-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:8:y:2014:i:c:p:178-184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041614000333
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:arz:wpaper:eres_lib_105 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Cornelis A. Bochove & Nees Jan Eck, 2011. "On the map: Nature and Science editorials," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 99-112, January.
    3. Mert, Aysem, 2009. "Partnerships for sustainable development as discursive practice: Shifts in discourses of environment and democracy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 109-122, March.
    4. Lan Ge & Michiel van Galen & Marcel van Asseldonk & Jos Verstegen & Marc Ruijs & Olaf Hietbrink & Madeleine van Mansfeld & Peter Smeets & Arjen Simons, 2011. "The nature of agroparks: synergy versus risk," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 509-523, September.
    5. Suogang Gao & Zengti Li & Hongjie Du & Yan Shi & Weili Wu, 2011. "Approaching pooling design with smaller efficient ratio," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 125-135, January.
    6. Mario Sportelli & Giuseppe Celi, 2011. "A Mathematical Approach To Harrod'S Open Economy Dynamics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 459-493, July.
    7. Liu, Jian & Li, Tiejun, 2011. "A validity index approach for network partitions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(20), pages 3579-3591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José A. Puppim de Oliveira & Umesh Mukhi & Camilla Quental & Paulo Jordão de Oliveira Cerqueira Fortes, 2022. "Connecting businesses and biodiversity conservation through community organizing: The case of babassu breaker women in Brazil," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2618-2634, July.
    2. Samantha Herbert & Peter Bradley & Mark Everard, 2023. "Exploring the prioritisation of biodiversity amongst small‐ to medium‐sized enterprise leaders with strong bigger‐than‐self value orientation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5633-5649, December.
    3. Laurent Mermet & C. Feger, 2022. "New Business Models for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Services: An Action Research With a Large Environmental Sector Company," Post-Print hal-02976891, HAL.
    4. D. D’Amato & M. Wan & N. Li & M. Rekola & A. Toppinen, 2018. "Managerial Views of Corporate Impacts and Dependencies on Ecosystem Services: A Case of International and Domestic Forestry Companies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1011-1028, July.
    5. Krause, Marlen S. & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2019. "The intention of companies to invest in biodiversity and ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Lähtinen, Katja & Guan, Yucong & Li, Ning & Toppinen, Anne, 2016. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services in supply chain management in the global forest industry," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PA), pages 130-140.
    7. Jan Bebbington & Tom Cuckston & C. Feger, 2021. "Biodiversity," Post-Print hal-03746729, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael Mcaleer, 2013. "What Do Experts Know About Forecasting Journal Quality? A Comparison With Isi Research Impact In Finance," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 1-30.
    2. Sadath, Nazmus & Kleinschmit, Daniela & Giessen, Lukas, 2013. "Framing the tiger — A biodiversity concern in national and international media reporting," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 37-41.
    3. Blicharska, Malgorzata & Van Herzele, Ann, 2015. "What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Białowieża Forest in Poland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 22-30.
    4. Yang, Shanlin & Bai, Yu & Wang, Sufeng & Feng, Nanping, 2013. "Evaluating the transformation of China’s industrial development mode during 2000–2009," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 585-594.
    5. JESSICA JEWELL & ALEH CHERP & VADIM VINICHENKO & NICO BAUER & TOM KOBER & DAVID McCOLLUM & DETLEF P. VAN VUUREN & BOB VAN DER ZWAAN, 2013. "ENERGY SECURITY OF CHINA, INDIA, THE E.U. AND THE U.S. UNDER LONG-TERM SCENARIOS: RESULTS FROM SIX IAMs," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 1-33.
    6. Matthew L. Wallace & Ismael Rafols, 2016. "Shaping the Agenda of a Grand Challenge: Institutional Mediation of Priorities in Avian Influenza Research," SPRU Working Paper Series 2016-02, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Giuseppe Orlando & Giovanna Zimatore, 2021. "Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Business Cycles," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, in: Giuseppe Orlando & Alexander N. Pisarchik & Ruedi Stoop (ed.), Nonlinearities in Economics, chapter 0, pages 269-282, Springer.
    8. Wallace, Matthew L. & Ràfols, Ismael, 2018. "Institutional shaping of research priorities: A case study on avian influenza," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1975-1989.
    9. Gerardo Tibaná-Herrera & María Teresa Fernández-Bajón & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2018. "Global analysis of the E-learning scientific domain: a declining category?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 675-685, February.
    10. Aparna Basu & Roland Wagner Dobler, 2012. "‘Cognitive mobility’ or migration of authors between fields used in mapping a network of mathematics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 353-368, May.
    11. Ayşem Mert, 2014. "Hybrid governance mechanisms as political instruments: the case of sustainability partnerships," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 225-244, September.
    12. Ondřej Pecha & Jiří Vaněček, 2015. "Analysis of the Czech and Hungarian physiology publications 1994–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 991-1003, November.
    13. Bornmann, Lutz & Waltman, Ludo, 2011. "The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science—A visualization approach by using density maps," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 547-553.
    14. Frank Biermann, 2013. "Curtain down and Nothing Settled: Global Sustainability Governance after the ‘Rio+20’ Earth Summit," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(6), pages 1099-1114, December.
    15. Houcemeddine Turki & Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb & Mohamed Ben Aouicha & Ajith Abraham, 2020. "Nature or Science: what Google Trends says," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1367-1385, August.
    16. Kai Wang & Zhongkai Xiong & Yu Xiong & Wei Yan, 2015. "Remanufacturer–Manufacturer Collaboration in a Supply Chain: The Manufacturer Plays the Leader Role," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(05), pages 1-17.
    17. Bryant, Scott T. & Straker, Karla & Wrigley, Cara, 2019. "The discourses of power – governmental approaches to business models in the renewable energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 41-59.
    18. Emmanuel Osagumwenro Ero & Humphrey Benedo Osadolor & Laurel Imose Oyakhilome, 2023. "Effect of Aqueous Leaf Extract of Terminalia catappa (Indian Almond) on the Liver of Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Wistar Rat," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(05), pages 79-87, May.
    19. Emmanuelle Cheyns, 2014. "Making “minority voices” heard in transnational roundtables: the role of local NGOs in reintroducing justice and attachments," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(3), pages 439-453, September.
    20. Pragyan Deb & Davide Furceri & Jonathan D. Ostry & Nour Tawk, 2022. "The Economic Effects of COVID-19 Containment Measures," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-32, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:8:y:2014:i:c:p:178-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.