IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v476y2023ics0304380022003337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moths exhibit strong memory among cooperative species of other taxonomic groups: An empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Rana, Sourav
  • Basu, Ayanendranath
  • Ghosh, Sinchan
  • Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi

Abstract

Just as competition, cooperation is also a fundamental aspect of species’ growth and survival strategies. An optimal degree of aggregation is necessary for survival and optimum population growth, perfectly balancing competition and cooperation. Like cooperation, species memory is also an essential aspect in terms of species behavior. It is debatable whether a species uses its memory for the evaluation of cooperation in an ecosystem or not. This article attempts to provide a new outlook on the relationship between the two phenomena, memory and cooperation. We have studied and analyzed time series abundance data for a large number of species available in the Global population dynamic database (GPDD) database exhibiting evidence of cooperation. Our analysis indicates that among such cooperative species, the insect community, especially the moth species, has a stronger memory than other taxonomy groups. We finally provide the idea of the interplay between memory and cooperation regarding the system’s stability. These findings can open up new avenues in understanding species’ behavior in the ecological niche.

Suggested Citation

  • Rana, Sourav & Basu, Ayanendranath & Ghosh, Sinchan & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, 2023. "Moths exhibit strong memory among cooperative species of other taxonomic groups: An empirical study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:476:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003337
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022003337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco A. Janssen, 2006. "Evolution of Cooperation when Feedback to Reputation Scores is Voluntary," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Bhowmick, Amiya Ranjan & Saha, Bapi & Chattopadhyay, Joydev & Ray, Santanu & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, 2015. "Cooperation in species: Interplay of population regulation and extinction through global population dynamics database," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 150-165.
    3. Alan H. Krakauer, 2005. "Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 69-72, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    2. Yutaka NAKAI & Masayoshi Muto, 2008. "Emergence and Collapse of Peace with Friend Selection Strategies," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6.
    3. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Analyzing collective action," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 155-166, November.
    4. Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Wang, Peng & Ma, Jun-Chao & Zhu, Peican & Han, Zhen & Podobnik, Boris & Stanley, H. Eugene & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Alistair Sutcliffe & Di Wang, 2012. "Computational Modelling of Trust and Social Relationships," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(1), pages 1-3.
    6. Kundu, Sayani & Dasgupta, Nirjhar & Chakraborty, Bratati & Paul, Ayan & Ray, Santanu & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, 2021. "Growth acceleration is the key for identifying the most favorable food concentration of Artemia sp," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    7. Karim, Md Aktar Ul & Bhagat, Supriya Ramdas & Bhowmick, Amiya Ranjan, 2022. "Empirical detection of parameter variation in growth curve models using interval specific estimators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Matthijs van Veelen & Benjamin Allen & Moshe Hoffman & Burton Simon & Carl Veller, 2016. "Inclusive Fitness," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-055/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    9. Paul, Ayan & Reja, Selim & Kundu, Sayani & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic models revisited with a new proposal: Plenty of epidemiological models outcast the simple population dynamics solution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Terence C. Burnham & Jay Phelan, 2023. "Ordinaries 13: apparent spite & apparent altruism," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 147-180, December.
    11. Reeson, Andrew F. & Tisdell, John G. & McAllister, Ryan R.J., 2011. "Trust, reputation and relationships in grazing rights markets: An experimental economic study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 651-658, February.
    12. Roy, Trina & Ghosh, Sinchan & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi, 2022. "A new growth curve model portraying the stress response regulation of fish: Illustration through particle motion and real data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    13. Riccardo Boero & Giangiacomo Bravo & Marco Castellani & Francesco Laganà & Flaminio Squazzoni, 2009. "Pillars of Trust: An Experimental Study on Reputation and Its Effects," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(5), pages 49-67, November.
    14. Soumalya Mukhopadhyay & Arnab Hazra & Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick & Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, 2016. "On comparison of relative growth rates under different environmental conditions with application to biological data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(3), pages 311-337, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:476:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.