IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v398y2019icp35-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transient dynamics: Equilibrium, collapse, and extinction in age-structured models. The case of the Northern cod stock

Author

Listed:
  • Maroto, José M.
  • Morán, Manuel

Abstract

Equilibrium-based methods are widely used in the literature on population ecology to analyze the sustainability of the management strategy. This approach fails to account for many factors such as age-specific natural mortality rates, the cohort survival rates, the possibility of extinction, the characterization of the equilibriums, their stability properties, and transient dynamics. We propose here a method, based on the theory of non-linear dynamic systems, that determines necessary and sufficient conditions for the stability of the equilibrium in age-structured models, using time-independent survival rates (autonomous) and age-specific natural mortality rates. In the case of a hockey stick stock-recruitment function, the method characterizes the equilibriums, their stability properties, and transient dynamics. Depending on the cohort survival rates, we find that there are two opposite scenarios: extinction or positive equilibrium. In the latter case, we also find the possibility of collapse with slow recovery. We demonstrate that the stock tends to equilibrium at an exponential rate in both scenarios. Considering the Northern cod (Gadus morhua) stock by way of illustration, we find that slow recovery of the stock could be expected at sufficiently low cohort survival rates, despite the fact that the condition for the stability of the equilibrium was met during the moratorium period (positive equilibrium). This result is consistent with the species’ lack of expected recovery. In contrast to equilibrium-based methods under constant natural mortality rates and the precautionary approach framework, we also find the possibility of extinction at sufficiently low cohort survival rates, even in the absence of harvesting.

Suggested Citation

  • Maroto, José M. & Morán, Manuel, 2019. "Transient dynamics: Equilibrium, collapse, and extinction in age-structured models. The case of the Northern cod stock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 35-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:398:y:2019:i:c:p:35-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019300675
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takayama,Akira, 1985. "Mathematical Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314985.
    2. Kenneth T. Frank & Brian Petrie & Jonathan A. D. Fisher & William C. Leggett, 2011. "Transient dynamics of an altered large marine ecosystem," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7362), pages 86-89, September.
    3. Dorsey, Joseph W. & Hardy, Leon C., 2018. "Sustainability factors in dynamical systems modeling: Simulating the non-linear aspects of multiple equilibria," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 69-77.
    4. Lafuite, A.-S. & Loreau, M., 2017. "Time-delayed biodiversity feedbacks and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maćkowiak, Piotr, 2009. "Adaptive Rolling Plans Are Good," MPRA Paper 42043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Bosi, Stefano & Desmarchelier, David, 2018. "An economic model of metapopulation dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 196-204.
    3. Ambrus, Attila & Pathak, Parag A., 2011. "Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 500-512.
    4. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    5. Paolo Bertoletti & Giorgio Rampa, 2011. "On Marginal Returns and Inferior Inputs," Quaderni di Dipartimento 145, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    6. Lozada, Gabriel A., 1996. "Existence of equilibria in exhaustible resource industries Nonconvexities and discrete vs. continuous time," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-3), pages 433-444.
    7. Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco & Long, Ngo & Poschke, Markus, 2017. "Capital-labor substitution, structural change and growth," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), September.
    8. Ngo Long & Vincent Martinet, 2018. "Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 35-64, January.
    9. Crettez, Bertrand & Hayek, Naila & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "When is frugality optimal?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 65-75.
    10. Fritz, Oliver M. & Sonis, Michael & Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., 1998. "A Miyazawa analysis of interactions between polluting and non-polluting sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 289-305, September.
    11. Munisamy, Gopinath & Roe, Terry L., 1995. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Supply and Factor Returns in U.S. Agriculture, 1949-91," Bulletins 7516, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    12. Kort, P.M., 1992. "The Effects of Marketable Pollution Permits on the Firm's Optimal Investment Policies," Papers 9242, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.
    13. Freixas, Xavier & Parigi, Bruno M & Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2000. "Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations, and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 611-638, August.
    14. Anastasios Xepapadeas, 1995. "Managing the international commons: Resource use and pollution control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 375-391, June.
    15. Giorgio, 2019. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Smooth Nonlinear Programming Problems," DEM Working Papers Series 171, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    16. Cheng, John Q & Wellman, Michael P, 1998. "The WALRAS Algorithm: A Convergent Distributed Implementation of General Equilibrium Outcomes," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Peter Kort & Paul Loon & Mikulás Luptácik, 1991. "Optimal dynamic environmental policies of a profit maximizing firm," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 195-225, October.
    18. Giorgio Giorgi, 2022. "Nonsingular M-matrices: a Tour in the Various Characterizations and in Some Related Classes," DEM Working Papers Series 206, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    19. Georg Meran & Christian Hirschhausen, 2009. "A modified yardstick competition mechanism," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 223-245, June.
    20. Alessandra Buratto & Luca Grosset & Bruno Viscolani, 2012. "ε-Subgame Perfectness of an Open-Loop Stackelberg Equilibrium in Linear-State Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 269-279, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:398:y:2019:i:c:p:35-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.