IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v293y2014icp210-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of network, neighborhood, and node levels of analyses in two models of nitrogen cycling in the Cape Fear River Estuary

Author

Listed:
  • Hines, David E.
  • Borrett, Stuart R.

Abstract

Ecological network analysis is a set of algorithms that provide a holistic approach to the study of ecosystems. These analyses operate on at least three different hierarchical levels: network, neighborhood, and node. Network level analyses capture whole-system interactions and provide a broad view of the system; neighborhood level analyses provide relational information for specific parts or sub-networks; node level analyses offer descriptive characteristics of individual nodes. This work investigated the insights gained from each of these levels of analysis in an ecological network analysis case study. We compared two nitrogen cycling network models constructed at sites with different salinities, one oligohaline and one polyhaline, in the Cape Fear River Estuary, NC, USA as a case study to demonstrate the differences between levels of analysis. We evaluated the nitrogen cycling models at both the network and node levels, and compared these results to existing results of a neighborhood level analysis. We further compared the ecological implications of the nitrogen network comparison produced by each hierarchical level to test the null hypotheses that there would be no difference between the conclusions resulting from these levels of analysis. We found that while network level analyses showed little difference between the two nitrogen models, differences with potential ecological importance for the availability of nutrients to phytoplankton could be seen using node level analyses. The results of the existing neighborhood level analyses exhibited characteristics with similarities to the results of both the network and node level analyses. We show that higher hierarchical levels, which integrate the information contained at the lower levels, can mask potentially important signals when describing network attributes. Therefore, we conclude that ecosystem networks should be analyzed at multiple hierarchical levels to provide a complete description of system function.

Suggested Citation

  • Hines, David E. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2014. "A comparison of network, neighborhood, and node levels of analyses in two models of nitrogen cycling in the Cape Fear River Estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 210-220.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:293:y:2014:i:c:p:210-220
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013005607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schramski, J.R. & Gattie, D.K. & Patten, B.C. & Borrett, S.R. & Fath, B.D. & Whipple, S.J., 2007. "Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Distributed control in the environ networks of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, USA—Time series analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 18-30.
    2. Ann E. Krause & Kenneth A. Frank & Doran M. Mason & Robert E. Ulanowicz & William W. Taylor, 2003. "Compartments revealed in food-web structure," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6964), pages 282-285, November.
    3. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Hannon, Bruce, 2007. "Ecological network analysis: network construction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 49-55.
    4. Salas, Andria K. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2011. "Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1192-1204.
    5. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A., 2011. "Reconnecting environs to their environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2393-2403.
    6. Whipple, Stuart J. & Borrett, Stuart R. & Patten, Bernard C. & Gattie, David K. & Schramski, John R. & Bata, Seth A., 2007. "Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Comparative network environ analysis of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River estuary, USA—Time series analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Borrett, Stuart R. & Moody, James & Edelmann, Achim, 2014. "The rise of Network Ecology: Maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 111-127.
    2. Small, Gaston E. & Sterner, Robert W. & Finlay, Jacques C., 2014. "An Ecological Network Analysis of nitrogen cycling in the Laurentian Great Lakes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 150-160.
    3. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Tuominen, Lindsey K. & Whipple, Stuart J. & Patten, Bernard C. & Karatas, Zekeriya Y. & Kazanci, Caner, 2014. "Contribution of throughflows to the ecological interpretation of integral network utility," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 187-201.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A. & Salas, A.K., 2011. "Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2142-2148.
    2. Whipple, Stuart J. & Patten, Bernard C. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2014. "Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 161-186.
    3. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    4. Borrett, S.R. & Freeze, M.A., 2011. "Reconnecting environs to their environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2393-2403.
    5. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin & Feng, Kuishuang & Liu, Zhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2018. "Interregional carbon flows of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 342-352.
    6. Lu, Jingzhao & Lu, Hongwei & Wang, Weipeng & Feng, SanSan & Lei, Kaiwen, 2021. "Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of mining area soil based on land type changes: An information network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    7. Min, Yong & Jin, Xiaogang & Chang, Jie & Peng, Changhui & Gu, Baojing & Ge, Ying & Zhong, Yang, 2011. "Weak indirect effects inherent to nitrogen biogeochemical cycling within anthropogenic ecosystems: A network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3277-3284.
    8. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Zhai, Mengyu & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Zheng, Boyue & Guan, Yuru, 2020. "Inter-regional carbon flows embodied in electricity transmission: network simulation for energy-carbon nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Schramski, J.R. & Patten, B.C. & Kazanci, C. & Gattie, D.K. & Kellam, N.N., 2009. "The Reynolds transport theorem: Application to ecological compartment modeling and case study of ecosystem energetics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3225-3232.
    11. Yang, Zhifeng & Mao, Xufeng, 2011. "Wetland system network analysis for environmental flow allocations in the Baiyangdian Basin, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3785-3794.
    12. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Ecological network analysis of an industrial symbiosis system: A case study of the Shandong Lubei eco-industrial park," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 174-184.
    13. Zhang, Yan & Yang, Zhifeng & Yu, Xiangyi, 2009. "Ecological network and emergy analysis of urban metabolic systems: Model development, and a case study of four Chinese cities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1431-1442.
    14. Bata, Seth A. & Borrett, Stuart R. & Patten, Bernard C. & Whipple, Stuart J. & Schramski, John R. & Gattie, David K., 2007. "Equivalence of throughflow- and storage-based environs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 400-406.
    15. Li, Y. & Yang, Z.F., 2011. "Quantifying the sustainability of water use systems: Calculating the balance between network efficiency and resilience," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1771-1780.
    16. Zhang, Xiaolin & Zhang, Yan & Wang, Yifan & Fath, Brian D., 2021. "Research progress and hotspot analysis for reactive nitrogen flows in macroscopic systems based on a CiteSpace analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    17. Jordán, Ferenc & Okey, Thomas A. & Bauer, Barbara & Libralato, Simone, 2008. "Identifying important species: Linking structure and function in ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 75-80.
    18. Zhang, Yan & Lu, Hanjing & Fath, Brian D. & Zheng, Hongmei, 2016. "Modelling urban nitrogen metabolic processes based on ecological network analysis: A case of study in Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 29-38.
    19. Matamba, L. & Kazanci, C. & Schramski, J.R. & Blessing, M. & Alexander, P. & Patten, B.C., 2009. "Throughflow analysis: A stochastic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3174-3181.
    20. Li, Y. & Chen, B. & Yang, Z.F., 2009. "Ecological network analysis for water use systems—A case study of the Yellow River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3163-3173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:293:y:2014:i:c:p:210-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.