IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v286y2014icp45-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the impact of initial age structure on the recovery of a healthy over-harvested population

Author

Listed:
  • Isomaa, Marleena
  • Kaitala, Veijo
  • Laakso, Jouni

Abstract

Effective fishing has created a need for precautionary fishery management. However, both profitable and sustainable harvesting policies have been challenging to accomplish. One factor determining population resilience is the recovery capacity of the stock under environmental and harvesting pressure. Achieving sustainable fishing strategies requires enough knowledge of population recovery dynamics. We study the effect of the initial age structure on the recovery of a heavily exploited population. As an example species, we use Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias), the population dynamics of which are strongly influenced by environmental factors and fishing. The recovery process was scored during a time window of five years in the absence of harvesting and was also subjected to proportional and threshold harvesting. Our results show that initial age structure has a strong impact on population recovery capacity in the short run, especially in over-harvested populations and under strongly fluctuating environmental conditions. Thus, advantageous age structure is one of the main drivers in the early recovery of the stock. The data on which the fisheries management is based should include reliable information on the age structure of the stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Isomaa, Marleena & Kaitala, Veijo & Laakso, Jouni, 2014. "Determining the impact of initial age structure on the recovery of a healthy over-harvested population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 45-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:286:y:2014:i:c:p:45-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014001975
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eero, Margit & Köster, Friedrich W. & Vinther, Morten, 2012. "Why is the Eastern Baltic cod recovering?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 235-240, January.
    2. Christian N. K. Anderson & Chih-hao Hsieh & Stuart A. Sandin & Roger Hewitt & Anne Hollowed & John Beddington & Robert M. May & George Sugihara, 2008. "Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7189), pages 835-839, April.
    3. Doring, Ralf & Egelkraut, Thorsten M., 2008. "Investing in natural capital as management strategy in fisheries: The case of the Baltic Sea cod fishery," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 634-642, January.
    4. Jeffrey A. Hutchings, 2000. "Collapse and recovery of marine fishes," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 882-885, August.
    5. R. M. Cook & A. Sinclair & G. Stefánsson, 1997. "Potential collapse of North Sea cod stocks," Nature, Nature, vol. 385(6616), pages 521-522, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isomaa, Marleena & Kaitala, Veijo & Laakso, Jouni, 2013. "Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) recovery potential under different environment and fishery scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 118-125.
    2. Rudi Voss & Martin F Quaas & Jörn O Schmidt & Olli Tahvonen & Martin Lindegren & Christian Möllmann, 2014. "Assessing Social – Ecological Trade-Offs to Advance Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-8, September.
    3. Cabral, Reniel B. & Aliño, Porfirio M. & Lim, May T., 2013. "A coupled stock-recruitment-age-structured model of the North Sea cod under the influence of depensation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Cecilia Hammarlund, 2015. "The Big, the Bad, and the Average: Hedonic Prices and Inverse Demand for Baltic Cod," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 157-177.
    5. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    6. Nye, Janet A. & Gamble, Robert J. & Link, Jason S., 2013. "The relative impact of warming and removing top predators on the Northeast US large marine biotic community," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 157-168.
    7. Rau, Anna-Lena & von Wehrden, Henrik & Abson, David J., 2018. "Temporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 122-130.
    8. Maciej T Tomczak & Johanna J Heymans & Johanna Yletyinen & Susa Niiranen & Saskia A Otto & Thorsten Blenckner, 2013. "Ecological Network Indicators of Ecosystem Status and Change in the Baltic Sea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    10. Zhang, Chongliang & Chen, Yong & Ren, Yiping, 2016. "The efficacy of fisheries closure in rebuilding depleted stocks: Lessons from size-spectrum modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 59-66.
    11. Dercole, Fabio & Della Rossa, Fabio, 2017. "A deterministic eco-genetic model for the short-term evolution of exploited fish stocks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 80-100.
    12. Eisenbarth, Sabrina, 2022. "Do exports of renewable resources lead to resource depletion? Evidence from fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. James M. Stewart & Peter D. Callagher, 2003. "New Zealand fisheries management: changes in property rights structure and implications for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 69-76.
    14. Hansen, Lars Gårn & Jensen, Frank & Russell, Clifford, 2013. "Instrument choice when regulators are concerned about resource extinction," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 135-147.
    15. Hossain, Md. Monir & Matsuishi, Takashi & Arhonditsis, George, 2010. "Elucidation of ecosystem attributes of an oligotrophic lake in Hokkaido, Japan, using Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(13), pages 1717-1730.
    16. Sebastian Villasante & David Rodríguez-González & Manel Antelo, 2013. "On the Non-Compliance in the North Sea Cod Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Zhongxun Zhang & Kaifang Shi & Zhiyong Zhu & Lu Tang & Kangchuan Su & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Rural Natural Capital Utilization Efficiency: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Grilli, Gianluca & Curtis, John & Hynes, Stephen, 2018. "Using angling logbook data to inform fishery management decisions," Papers WP600, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    19. Bowen Zhang & Heidi Pethybridge & Patti Virtue & Peter D. Nichols & Kerrie Swadling & Alan Williams & Kim Lee-Chang, 2023. "Evaluating Alternative and Sustainable Food Resources: A Review of the Nutritional Composition of Myctophid Fishes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Almeida, Cheila & Karadzic, Vanja & Vaz, Sofia, 2015. "The seafood market in Portugal: Driving forces and consequences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:286:y:2014:i:c:p:45-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.