IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v221y2010i2p191-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How sensitive are elasticities of long-run stochastic growth to how environmental variability is modelled?

Author

Listed:
  • Ezard, Thomas H.G.
  • Coulson, Tim

Abstract

A variable environment leaves a signature in a population's dynamics. Deriving statistical and mathematical models of how environmental variability affects population projections has – in the wake of reports of substantial climatic fluctuations – received much recent attention. If the model changes, then so too does the population projection. This is because a different model of environmental variability changes estimates of long-run stochastic growth, which is a function of demographic rates and their temporal sequence. Decomposing elasticities of long-run stochastic growth into constituent parts can assess the relative influence of different components. Here, we investigate the consequences of changing the environmental state definition, and therefore altering the shape of demographic rate distributions and their temporal sequence, by using age-structured matrix models to project vertebrate populations into the future under a range of environmental scenarios. The identity of the most influential demographic rate was consistent among all approaches that perturbed only the mean, but was not when only the variance was perturbed. Furthermore, the influence of each demographic rate fluctuated among projections by up to factors of six and two for changes to the variance and mean, respectively. These changes in influence depend in part upon how environmental variability – in particular, the color of environmental noise – is incorporated. In the light of predictions of increasing climatic variability in the future, these results suggest caution when drawing quantitative conclusions from stochastic population projections.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezard, Thomas H.G. & Coulson, Tim, 2010. "How sensitive are elasticities of long-run stochastic growth to how environmental variability is modelled?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 191-200.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:2:p:191-200
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009006383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. B. Hallett & T. Coulson & J. G. Pilkington & T. H. Clutton-Brock & J. M. Pemberton & B. T. Grenfell, 2004. "Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6995), pages 71-75, July.
    2. Christian N. K. Anderson & Chih-hao Hsieh & Stuart A. Sandin & Roger Hewitt & Anne Hollowed & John Beddington & Robert M. May & George Sugihara, 2008. "Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7189), pages 835-839, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Yangchen & Sutherland, William J., 2013. "Color and degree of interspecific synchrony of environmental noise affect the variability of complex ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 162-173.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isomaa, Marleena & Kaitala, Veijo & Laakso, Jouni, 2013. "Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) recovery potential under different environment and fishery scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 118-125.
    2. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    3. Nye, Janet A. & Gamble, Robert J. & Link, Jason S., 2013. "The relative impact of warming and removing top predators on the Northeast US large marine biotic community," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 157-168.
    4. Rau, Anna-Lena & von Wehrden, Henrik & Abson, David J., 2018. "Temporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 122-130.
    5. Juan Shi & Rou-Jia Wang & Feng-yan Wang, 2020. "Mind–Body Health Technique Liu Zi Jue: Its Creation, Transition, and Formalization," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    6. Williams, Meryl J., 2010. "Food from the Water: How the Fish Production Revolution Affects Aquatic Biodiversity and Food Security," 2010: Biodiversity and World Food Security: Nourishing the Planet and Its People, 30 August-1 September 2010 125247, Crawford Fund.
    7. Andreas Sundelöf & Valerio Bartolino & Mats Ulmestrand & Massimiliano Cardinale, 2013. "Multi-Annual Fluctuations in Reconstructed Historical Time-Series of a European Lobster (Homarus gammarus) Population Disappear at Increased Exploitation Levels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Montalto, Valeria & Sarà, Gianluca & Ruti, Paolo Michele & Dell’Aquila, Alessandro & Helmuth, Brian, 2014. "Testing the effects of temporal data resolution on predictions of the effects of climate change on bivalves," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 278(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Thanassekos, Stéphane & Scheld, Andrew M., 2020. "Simulating the effects of environmental and market variability on fishing industry structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Florian Diekert, 2012. "Growth Overfishing: The Race to Fish Extends to the Dimension of Size," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 549-572, August.
    11. Frisman, E.Y. & Neverova, G.P. & Revutskaya, O.L., 2011. "Complex dynamics of the population with a simple age structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1943-1950.
    12. Jie Ning & Matthew J. Sobel, 2019. "Easy Affine Markov Decision Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1719-1737, November.
    13. Engen, Steinar, 2017. "Spatial synchrony and harvesting in fluctuating populations:Relaxing the small noise assumption," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 18-26.
    14. Shilu Tong & Peter Mather & Gerry Fitzgerald & David McRae & Ken Verrall & Dylan Walker, 2010. "Assessing the Vulnerability of Eco-Environmental Health to Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. John M Halley & Kyle S Van Houtan & Nate Mantua, 2018. "How survival curves affect populations’ vulnerability to climate change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Wikström, Anders & Ripa, Jörgen & Jonzén, Niclas, 2012. "The role of harvesting in age-structured populations: Disentangling dynamic and age truncation effects," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 348-354.
    17. Ni, Yuanming, 2019. "Optimization of age-structured bioeconomic model: recruitment, weight gain and environmental effects," Discussion Papers 2019/4, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    18. do Val, J.B.R. & Guillotreau, P. & Vallée, T., 2019. "Fishery management under poorly known dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 242-257.
    19. Holland, Daniel S. & Herrera, Guillermo E., 2012. "The impact of age structure, uncertainty, and asymmetric spatial dynamics on regulatory performance in a fishery metapopulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 207-218.
    20. José Hódar & Regino Zamora & Luis Cayuela, 2012. "Climate change and the incidence of a forest pest in Mediterranean ecosystems: can the North Atlantic Oscillation be used as a predictor?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 699-711, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:2:p:191-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.