IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sss/wpaper/2016-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effects of Invasive Pests and Diseases on Strategies for Forest Diversification

Author

Listed:
  • Morag F. Macpherson

    (Computing Science and Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling)

  • Adam Kleczkowski

    (Computing Science and Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling)

  • John R. Healey

    (School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University)

  • Chris Quine

    (Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian)

  • Nick Hanley

    (Department of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St. Andrews)

Abstract

Diversication of the tree species composition of production forests is a frequently advocated strategy to increase resilience to pests and diseases, however there is a lack of a general framework to analyse the impact of economic and biological conditions on the optimal planting strategy in the presence of tree disease. To meet this need we use a novel bioeconomic model to quantitatively assess the eect of tree disease on the optimal planting proportion of two tree species. We nd that diversifying the species composition can reduce the loss from disease even when the benet from the resistant species is small. However this key result is sensitive to a pathogen's characteristics (probability of arrival, time of arrival, rate of spread of infection) and the costs (damage of the disease to the susceptible species and reduced benet of planting the resistant species). This study provides an exemplar framework which can be used to help understand the eect of a pathogen on forest management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Morag F. Macpherson & Adam Kleczkowski & John R. Healey & Chris Quine & Nick Hanley, 2016. "The Effects of Invasive Pests and Diseases on Strategies for Forest Diversification," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2016-11, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    • Handle: RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geography-and-sustainable-development/pdf-s/DP%202016-11%20Macpherson%20et%20alpdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morag F. Macpherson & Adam Kleczkowski & John Healey & Nick Hanley, 2015. "When to harvest? The effect of disease on optimal forest rotation," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2015-19, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    2. Thompson, Robin N. & Cobb, Richard C. & Gilligan, Christopher A. & Cunniffe, Nik J., 2016. "Management of invading pathogens should be informed by epidemiology rather than administrative boundaries," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 28-32.
    3. Lars Gamfeldt & Tord Snäll & Robert Bagchi & Micael Jonsson & Lena Gustafsson & Petter Kjellander & María C. Ruiz-Jaen & Mats Fröberg & Johan Stendahl & Christopher D. Philipson & Grzegorz Mikusiński , 2013. "Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. & Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. & Kean, John M. & Turner, James A., 2013. "Designing cost-efficient surveillance strategies for early detection of invasive species," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150011, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Sims, Charles & Aadland, David & Finnoff, David, 2010. "A dynamic bioeconomic analysis of mountain pine beetle epidemics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2407-2419, December.
    6. Pimentel, David & Zuniga, Rodolfo & Morrison, Doug, 2005. "Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 273-288, February.
    7. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.
    8. Knoke, Thomas & Seifert, Thomas, 2008. "Integrating selected ecological effects of mixed European beech–Norway spruce stands in bioeconomic modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 487-498.
    9. Martial L Ndeffo Mbah & Christopher A Gilligan, 2011. "Resource Allocation for Epidemic Control in Metapopulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Macpherson, Morag F. & Kleczkowski, Adam & Healey, John R. & Quine, Christopher P. & Hanley, Nick, 2017. "The effects of invasive pests and pathogens on strategies for forest diversification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 87-99.
    2. Kolo, Horst & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2020. "Optimizing forest management for timber production, carbon sequestration and groundwater recharge," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    3. Friedrich, Stefan & Paul, Carola & Brandl, Susanne & Biber, Peter & Messerer, Katharina & Knoke, Thomas, 2019. "Economic impact of growth effects in mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech – A simulation based study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 65-80.
    4. Melstrom, Richard T., 2014. "Managing apparent competition between the feral pigs and native foxes of Santa Cruz Island," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 157-162.
    5. Walker, Adam N. & Poos, Jan-Jaap & Groeneveld, Rolf A., 2015. "Invasive species control in a one-dimensional metapopulation network," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 316(C), pages 176-184.
    6. Schou, Erik & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl & Kristensen, Kristian Løkke, 2012. "An economic evaluation of strategies for transforming even-aged into near-natural forestry in a conifer-dominated forest in Denmark," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 89-98.
    7. Atallah, Shadi S. & Huang, Ju-Chin & Leahy, Jessica & Bennett, Karen, 2020. "Preference Heterogeneity and Neighborhood Effect in Invasive Species Control: The Case of Glossy Buckthorn in New Hampshire and Maine Forests," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304623, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Etienne Lorang & Antonello Lobianco & Philippe Delacote, 2023. "Increasing Paper and Cardboard Recycling: Impacts on the Forest Sector and Carbon Emissions," Post-Print hal-04690101, HAL.
    9. Ceddia, M.G. & Bardsley, N.O. & Goodwin, R. & Holloway, G.J. & Nocella, G. & Stasi, A., 2013. "A complex system perspective on the emergence and spread of infectious diseases: Integrating economic and ecological aspects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 124-131.
    10. Innangi, Michele & Balestrieri, Rosario & Danise, Tiziana & d’Alessandro, Francesco & Fioretto, Antonietta, 2019. "From soil to bird community: A Partial Least Squares approach to investigate a natural wooded area surrounded by urban patchwork (Astroni crater, southern Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Travis Warziniack & David Finnoff & Jonathan Bossenbroek & Jason Shogren & David Lodge, 2011. "Stepping Stones for Biological Invasion: A Bioeconomic Model of Transferable Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(4), pages 605-627, December.
    12. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    13. Wildberg, Johannes & Möhring, Bernhard, 2019. "Empirical analysis of the economic effect of tree species diversity based on the results of a forest accountancy data network," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Blackwood, Julie & Hastings, Alan & Costello, Christopher, 2010. "Cost-effective management of invasive species using linear-quadratic control," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 519-527, January.
    15. Zanchi, Giuliana & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & Yu, Lin, 2014. "Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 48-59.
    16. Kovacs, Kent F. & Haight, Robert G. & Mercader, Rodrigo J. & McCullough, Deborah G., 2014. "A bioeconomic analysis of an emerald ash borer invasion of an urban forest with multiple jurisdictions," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 270-289.
    17. Cook, David & Proctor, Wendy, 2007. "Assessing the threat of exotic plant pests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 594-604, August.
    18. Mirko Di Febbraro & Peter W W Lurz & Piero Genovesi & Luigi Maiorano & Marco Girardello & Sandro Bertolino, 2013. "The Use of Climatic Niches in Screening Procedures for Introduced Species to Evaluate Risk of Spread: A Case with the American Eastern Grey Squirrel," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    19. Colvin, Michael E. & Pierce, Clay L. & Stewart, Timothy W., 2015. "A food web modeling analysis of a Midwestern, USA eutrophic lake dominated by non-native Common Carp and Zebra Mussels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 26-40.
    20. Beça, Pedro & Santos, Rui, 2010. "Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the ISEW," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 810-819, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bioeconomic modelling; Forest management; Natural Resource management; Tree pests and pathogens; Species diversification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laure Kuhfuss (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eestauk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.