IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v251y2013icp232-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon turnover in mixed stands: Modelling possible shifts under climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Shanin, Vladimir
  • Komarov, Alexander
  • Khoraskina, Yulia
  • Bykhovets, Sergey
  • Linkosalo, Tapio
  • Mäkipää, Raisa

Abstract

Adaptation of forest management to changing climate may lead to remarkable changes in tree species composition. Deciduous species are predicted to be favoured in a warmer climate, but the competitive capacity of different tree species requires detailed analysis. The main objectives of this study were to assess how varied initial proportions of tree species affected productivity in mixed stands, and to evaluate the biomass production and carbon sequestration potential of trees and soil in mixed stands in a changing climate. We used the individual-based simulation model EFIMOD combined with the model of soil organic matter dynamics ROMUL to simulate spatially explicit competition between trees for light and nutrients. We focused our simulations on the most common type of site (mesic site, Myrtillus type) in southern Finland. The average carbon and nitrogen pools in the forest floor and mineral soil were used as initial soil data. The ambient climate scenario was based on measured data (1961–2007) from the Finnish Meteorological Institute. Climate change scenarios were based on runs of three general circulation models. We simulated the forest stand dynamics of two- and three-species mixtures (Silver birch, Scots pine and Norway spruce) with different initial proportions. In mixed spruce–birch stands, spruce replaced birch whatever the initial density, regardless of climatic scenario. In the beginning of the development of mixed spruce–pine stands, pine grew faster and increased its proportion of biomass by 10–20%. In pine–birch stands, the dominant species maintained its dominating position, but the proportion of pine generally declined by the end of simulation in birch-dominated stands. In mixed stands of three tree species, spruce tended to dominate by the end of a 100-year simulation period, independently of the initial proportions. The highest average carbon stock in standing biomass was observed in mixed stands with three species and in spruce-dominated stands. Climate change increased stand productivity and the increase in coniferous stands was more remarkable than in birch-dominated stands. In addition, soil was affected by species composition: increased proportions of pine resulted in increasing carbon stocks in the forest floor. Climate change negatively affected accumulation of organic matter in soil, especially in the spruce-dominated stands.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanin, Vladimir & Komarov, Alexander & Khoraskina, Yulia & Bykhovets, Sergey & Linkosalo, Tapio & Mäkipää, Raisa, 2013. "Carbon turnover in mixed stands: Modelling possible shifts under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 232-245.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:251:y:2013:i:c:p:232-245
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012005959
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Loreau & Andy Hector, 2001. "Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6842), pages 72-76, July.
    2. Karjalainen, Timo & Pussinen, Ari & Liski, Jari & Nabuurs, Gert-Jan & Eggers, Thies & Lapvetelainen, Tuija & Kaipainen, Terhi, 2003. "Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 141-155, July.
    3. Mingkui Cao & F. Ian Woodward, 1998. "Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6682), pages 249-252, May.
    4. Shanin, Vladimir N. & Komarov, Alexander S. & Mikhailov, Alexey V. & Bykhovets, Sergei S., 2011. "Modelling carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems of Central Russia under different climate change scenarios and forest management regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2262-2275.
    5. Grabarnik, Pavel & Särkkä, Aila, 2009. "Modelling the spatial structure of forest stands by multivariate point processes with hierarchical interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(9), pages 1232-1240.
    6. R. B. Myneni & C. D. Keeling & C. J. Tucker & G. Asrar & R. R. Nemani, 1997. "Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6626), pages 698-702, April.
    7. Wilfried Thuiller, 2007. "Climate change and the ecologist," Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7153), pages 550-552, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandrov, G.A & Golitsyn, G.S., 2015. "Biological age from the viewpoint of the thermodynamic theory of ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 103-108.
    2. Laine-Kaulio, Hanne & Koivusalo, Harri & Komarov, Alexander S. & Lappalainen, Mari & Launiainen, Samuli & Laurén, Ari, 2014. "Extending the ROMUL model to simulate the dynamics of dissolved and sorbed C and N compounds in decomposing boreal mor," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 277-292.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jiarui & Jørgensen, Sven E. & Lu, Jianjian & Nielsen, Søren N. & Wang, Qiang, 2014. "A model for the contribution of macrophyte-derived organic carbon in harvested tidal freshwater marshes to surrounding estuarine and oceanic ecosystems and its response to global warming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 105-116.
    2. Xiuchen Wu & Hongyan Liu & Dali Guo & Oleg A Anenkhonov & Natalya K Badmaeva & Denis V Sandanov, 2012. "Growth Decline Linked to Warming-Induced Water Limitation in Hemi-Boreal Forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Akhlaq Amin Wani & Amir Farooq Bhat & Aaasif Ali Gatoo & Shiba Zahoor & Basira Mehraj & Naveed Najam & Qaisar Shafi Wani & M A Islam & Shah Murtaza & Moonisa Aslam Dervash & P K Joshi, 2021. "Assessing relationship of forest biophysical factors with NDVI for carbon management in key coniferous strata of temperate Himalayas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Ding, Yimin & Wang, Weiguang & Song, Ruiming & Shao, Quanxi & Jiao, Xiyun & Xing, Wanqiu, 2017. "Modeling spatial and temporal variability of the impact of climate change on rice irrigation water requirements in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 89-101.
    5. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Crop diversity, household welfare and consumption smoothing under risk: Evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Wang, Xiong & Wang, Xiao & Ren, Xiaohang & Wen, Fenghua, 2022. "Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Asrat, Sinafikeh & Yesuf, Mahmud & Carlsson, Fredrik & Wale, Edilegnaw, 2009. "Farmers’ Preferences for Crop Variety Traits: Lessons for On-Farm Conservation and Technology Adoption," RFF Working Paper Series dp-09-15-efd, Resources for the Future.
    8. Pachepsky, Elizaveta & Bown, James L. & Eberst, Alistair & Bausenwein, Ursula & Millard, Peter & Squire, Geoff R. & Crawford, John W., 2007. "Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 2: Linking diversity and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 277-285.
    9. F. Nelson & O. Anisimov & N. Shiklomanov, 2002. "Climate Change and Hazard Zonation in the Circum-Arctic Permafrost Regions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 26(3), pages 203-225, July.
    10. Jinting Guo & Yuanman Hu & Zaiping Xiong & Xiaolu Yan & Chunlin Li & Rencang Bu, 2017. "Variations in Growing-Season NDVI and Its Response to Permafrost Degradation in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Helen Ding & Sonja Teelucksingh, 2010. "European Forests and Carbon Sequestration Services: An Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts," Working Papers 2010.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Di Traglia, Mario & Attorre, Fabio & Francesconi, Fabio & Valenti, Roberto & Vitale, Marcello, 2011. "Is cellular automata algorithm able to predict the future dynamical shifts of tree species in Italy under climate change scenarios? A methodological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 925-934.
    13. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. John Reilly & David Schimmelpfennig, 2000. "Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Learning: Portraits of Adaptation to Long-Term Climate Change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 253-278, April.
    15. Di Falco, Salvatore & Bezabih, Mintewab & Yesuf, Mahmud, 2010. "Seeds for livelihood: Crop biodiversity and food production in Ethiopia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1695-1702, June.
    16. Klaus Keller & Kelvin Tan & Francois M.M. Morel & David F. Bradford, 1999. "Preserving the Ocean Circulation: Implications for Climate Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 199, CESifo.
    17. M. Jonas & S. Nilsson & A. Shvidenko & V. Stolbovoi & M. Gluck & M. Obersteiner & A. Oeskog, 1999. "Full Carbon Accounting and the Kyoto Protocol: A Systems- Analytical View," Working Papers ir99025, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    18. Nguyen Van Hiep & Nguyen Thi Thanh Thao & Luong Van Viet & Huynh Cong Luc & Le Huy Ba, 2023. "Affecting of Nature and Human Activities on the Trend of Vegetation Health Indices in Dak Nong Province, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Zhang, Yixiao & He, Tao & Liang, Shunlin & Zhao, Zhongguo, 2023. "A framework for estimating actual evapotranspiration through spatial heterogeneity-based machine learning approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    20. Li Yu & Fengxue Gu & Mei Huang & Bo Tao & Man Hao & Zhaosheng Wang, 2020. "Impacts of 1.5 °C and 2 °C Global Warming on Net Primary Productivity and Carbon Balance in China’s Terrestrial Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:251:y:2013:i:c:p:232-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.