IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v249y2013icp75-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying preferred management options: An integrated agent-based recreational fishing simulation model with an AHP-TOPSIS evaluation method

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Lei
  • Hailu, Atakelty

Abstract

In the management of recreational fishing, multiple biophysical and socio-economic objectives need to be considered. The identification of best management options is technically challenging because of the lack of scientific tools to inform resource managers of future responses/impacts of these different options.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Lei & Hailu, Atakelty, 2013. "Identifying preferred management options: An integrated agent-based recreational fishing simulation model with an AHP-TOPSIS evaluation method," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 75-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:249:y:2013:i:c:p:75-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012003274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Lei & Hailu, Atakelty, 2011. "Evaluating the effects of area closure for recreational fishing in a coral reef ecosystem: The benefits of an integrated economic and biophysical modeling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1735-1745, August.
    2. Peter Schuhmann & Kurt Schwabe, 2004. "An Analysis of Congestion Measures and Heterogeneous Angler Preferences in a Random Utility Model of Recreational Fishing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 27(4), pages 429-450, April.
    3. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    4. Little, L. Richard & Punt, André E. & Mapstone, Bruce D. & Begg, Gavin A. & Goldman, Barry & Williams, Ashley J., 2009. "An agent-based model for simulating trading of multi-species fisheries quota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3404-3412.
    5. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    6. Little, L.R. & Punt, A.E. & Mapstone, B.D. & Pantus, F. & Smith, A.D.M. & Davies, C.R. & McDonald, A.D., 2007. "ELFSim—A model for evaluating management options for spatially structured reef fish populations: An illustration of the “larval subsidy” effect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 381-396.
    7. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    8. BenDor, Todd & Scheffran, Jürgen & Hannon, Bruce, 2009. "Ecological and economic sustainability in fishery management: A multi-agent model for understanding competition and cooperation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1061-1073, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Raguragavan, Jananee & Hailu, Atakelty & Burton, Michael, 2013. "Economic Valuation of Recreational Fishing in Western Australia: Statewide Random Utility Modelling of Fishing Site Choice Behaviour," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1-20.
    3. Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2017. "Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 496-511.
    4. Angeliki Mentzafou & Momčilo Blagojević & Elias Dimitriou, 2021. "A GIS-MCDA-Based Suitability Analysis for Meeting Targets 6.3 and 6.5 of the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Sareh Hosseini & Jafar Oladi & Hamid Amirnejad, 2021. "The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9052-9075, June.
    6. Luis Diaz-Balteiro & Carlos Iglesias-Merchan & Carlos Romero & Silvestre García de Jalón, 2020. "The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Rogatka Krzysztof & Starczewski Tomasz & Kowalski Mateusz, 2022. "How the Analytical Hierarchical Process and Revitalisation Work Together: A Case Study of Poland," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 141-163.
    8. Zhao, Yabo & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing & Liu, Qianqian & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2017. "The spatial differentiation of the coupling relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment in countries globally: A comprehensive assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 313-327.
    9. Ahmed M. A. Shohda & Mahrous A. M. Ali & Gaofeng Ren & Jong-Gwan Kim & Ahmed M. Abdo & Wael R. Abdellah & Abbas M. Hassan, 2022. "Sustainable Assignment of Egyptian Ornamental Stones for Interior and Exterior Building Finishes Using the AHP-TOPSIS Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Krittiya Saksrisathaporn & Abdelaziz Bouras & Napaporn Reeveerakul & Aurelie Charles, 2016. "Application of a Decision Model by Using an Integration of AHP and TOPSIS Approaches within Humanitarian Operation Life Cycle," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 887-918, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanassekos, Stéphane & Scheld, Andrew M., 2020. "Simulating the effects of environmental and market variability on fishing industry structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Gao, Lei & Hailu, Atakelty, 2011. "Evaluating the effects of area closure for recreational fishing in a coral reef ecosystem: The benefits of an integrated economic and biophysical modeling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1735-1745, August.
    3. Atakelty Hailu & Lei Gao, 2012. "Research Note: Recreational Trip Timing and Duration Prediction," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(1), pages 243-251, February.
    4. Raguragavan, Jananee & Hailu, Atakelty & Burton, Michael, 2013. "Economic Valuation of Recreational Fishing in Western Australia: Statewide Random Utility Modelling of Fishing Site Choice Behaviour," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1-20.
    5. Yao, Yue & Sun, Deqiang & Xu, Jin-Hua & Wang, Bin & Peng, Guohong & Sun, Bingmei, 2023. "Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery methods for mature continental heavy oil fields in China based on geology, technology and sustainability criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    6. Mehdi KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Zenonas TURSKIS & Jurgita ANTUCHEVICIENE, 2016. "A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment(Codas) Method For Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(3), pages 25-44.
    7. Thébaud, Olivier & Innes, James & Norman-López, Ana & Slade, Stephanie & Cameron, Darren & Cannard, Toni & Tickell, Sharon & Kung, John & Kerrigan, Brigid & Williams, Lew & Richard Little, L., 2014. "Micro-economic drivers of profitability in an ITQ-managed fishery: An analysis of the Queensland Coral Reef Fin-Fish Fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 200-207.
    8. Tsai Chi Kuo & Chia-Wei Hsu & Jie-Ying Li, 2015. "Developing a Green Supplier Selection Model by Using the DANP with VIKOR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Alireza Shahrasbi & Mehdi Shamizanjani & M. H. Alavidoost & Babak Akhgar, 2017. "An Aggregated Fuzzy Model for the Selection of a Managed Security Service Provider," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 625-684, May.
    10. Sivaraja, C.M. & Sakthivel, G., 2017. "Compression ignition engine performance modelling using hybrid MCDM techniques for the selection of optimum fish oil biodiesel blend at different injection timings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 118-141.
    11. Srđan Ljubojević & Dragan Pamučar & Dragutin Jovanović & Vujadin Vešović, 2019. "Outsourcing transport service: a fuzzy multi-criteria methodology for provider selection based on comparison of the real and ideal parameters of providers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 399-433, June.
    12. Kannan Govindan & Aditi & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Arshia Kaul & PC Jha, 2021. "Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer–supplier collaboration: A grey‐decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory‐based approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1702-1722, May.
    13. Dhanisetty, V.S. Viswanath & Verhagen, W.J.C. & Curran, Richard, 2018. "Multi-criteria weighted decision making for operational maintenance processes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 152-164.
    14. Yongming Song & Jun Hu, 2017. "Vector similarity measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    16. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Giordani, Paolo & Jacobson, Tor & Schedvin, Erik von & Villani, Mattias, 2014. "Taking the Twists into Account: Predicting Firm Bankruptcy Risk with Splines of Financial Ratios," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 1071-1099, August.
    18. David Card, 2022. "Design-Based Research in Empirical Microeconomics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(6), pages 1773-1781, June.
    19. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2022. "Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329595, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Tu, Gengyang, 2020. "Conveyance, envy, and homeowner choice of appliances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:249:y:2013:i:c:p:75-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.